 |
|
Clinical Epidemiological Quality in Molecular Genetic Research
The Need for Methodological Standards
Sidney T. Bogardus, Jr, MD;
John Concato, MD, MS, MPH;
Alvan R. Feinstein, MD, MS
JAMA. 1999;281:1919-1926.
Context A genetic basis has been identified for many medical conditions and some molecular tests have been commercialized. However, little attention has been given to the quality of clinical epidemiology in molecular studies.
Objective To examine the clinical epidemiological quality of recent publications on molecular genetic analysis.
Design Cross-sectional study of original research articles published in 1995, identified by manually searching 4 general clinical journals. Of 83 articles identified, 40 were selected for analysis; these 40 discussed molecular genetic techniques, studied 10 or more patients, and had inferential conclusions.
Main Outcome Measure Compliance of the selected articles with 7 methodological standards for clinical epidemiological science (reproducibility, objectivity, delineation of case group, adequacy of spectrum in case group, delineation of comparison group, adequacy of comparison group, and quantitative summary of results).
Results Among the 40 inferential articles that studied 10 or more patients, only 5 (12.5%) complied with all 7 applicable standards, and 10 (25.0%) complied with all but 1 standard, whereas 25 articles (62.5%) failed to comply with 2 or more standards and 9 (22.5%) failed 4 or 5 standards. Most articles did not comply with standards for reproducibility (n=25, 62.5%) or objectivity (n=27, 67.5%); however, the majority of articles did comply with standards for adequacy of case group (n=35, 87.5%), adequacy of comparison group (n=35, 87.5%), and quantitative summary of results (n=36, 90%).
Conclusions Despite major laboratory advances in molecular genetic analysis, our data suggest that reported applications in clinical journals often have troubling omissions, deficiencies, and lack of attention to the different, but necessary, principles of clinical epidemiological science. Without suitable attention to fundamental methodological standards, the expected benefits of molecular genetic testing may not be achieved.
Author Affiliations: The Robert Wood Johnson Clinical Scholars Program and the Department of Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn (Drs Bogardus, Concato, and Feinstein), and the Clinical Epidemiology Unit, West Haven Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Veterans Affairs Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven (Dr Concato).
RELATED ARTICLE
May 26, 1999
JAMA. 1999;281(20):1959-1960.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
|
Vesicoureteral Reflux
Williams et al.
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2008;19:847-862.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies
Elm et al.
BMJ 2007;335:806-808.
FULL TEXT
The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies
von Elm et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2007;147:573-577.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
The evaluation of genetic tests
Zimmern and Kroese
J Public Health (Oxf) 2007;29:246-250.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
On the synthesis and interpretation of consistent but weak gene-disease associations in the era of genome-wide association studies
Khoury et al.
Int J Epidemiol 2007;36:439-445.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Quality of Reporting of Cancer Prognostic Marker Studies: Association With Reported Prognostic Effect
Kyzas et al.
JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst 2007;99:236-243.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Glutathione S-transferase T1 status and gastric cancer risk: a meta-analysis of the literature
Boccia et al.
Mutagenesis 2006;21:115-123.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Selective Reporting Biases in Cancer Prognostic Factor Studies
Kyzas et al.
JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst 2005;97:1043-1055.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Mapping the Theories of Preeclampsia: The Role of Homocysteine
Mignini et al.
Obstet Gynecol 2005;105:411-425.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Differential Genetic Effects of ESR1 Gene Polymorphisms on Osteoporosis Outcomes
Ioannidis et al.
JAMA 2004;292:2105-2114.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
The emergence of epidemiology in the genomics age
Khoury et al.
Int J Epidemiol 2004;33:936-944.
FULL TEXT
Methodology in Diagnostic Laboratory Test Research in Clinical Chemistry and Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
Lumbreras-Lacarra et al.
Clin. Chem. 2004;50:530-536.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Polymorphism in the P-selectin and interleukin-4 genes as determinants of stroke: a population-based, prospective genetic analysis
Zee et al.
Hum Mol Genet 2004;13:389-396.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Community genetics and community medicine
Knottnerus
Fam Pract 2003;20:601-606.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
The STARD Initiative and the Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy
Bruns
Clin. Chem. 2003;49:19-20.
FULL TEXT
Commentary: Epidemiology and the Continuum from Genetic Research to Genetic Testing
Khoury
Am J Epidemiol 2002;156:297-299.
FULL TEXT
Reporting, Appraising, and Integrating Data on Genotype Prevalence and Gene-Disease Associations
Little et al.
Am J Epidemiol 2002;156:300-310.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Poor-Quality Medical Research: What Can Journals Do?
Altman
JAMA 2002;287:2765-2767.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Misguided efforts and future challenges for research on "diagnostic tests"
Feinstein
J. Epidemiol. Community Health 2002;56:330-332.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Improving standards of medical and public health research
Colditz
J. Epidemiol. Community Health 2002;56:333-334.
FULL TEXT
Challenges in dia-prognostic research
Knottnerus
J. Epidemiol. Community Health 2002;56:340-341.
FULL TEXT
Genetic Variation in Coagulation and Fibrinolytic Proteins and Their Relation With Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Systematic Review
Boekholdt et al.
Circulation 2001;104:3063-3068.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Methods in epidemiology and public health: does practice match theory?
Weed
J. Epidemiol. Community Health 2001;55:104-110.
FULL TEXT
Toward a Checklist for Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy of Medical Tests
Bruns et al.
Clin. Chem. 2000;46:893-895.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|
