You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 282 No. 2, July 14, 1999 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Original Contribution
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (19)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Queuing for Coronary Angiography During Severe Supply-Demand Mismatch in a US Public Hospital

Analysis of a Waiting List Registry

Salvatore Rosanio, MD, PhD; Monica Tocchi, MD; David Cutler, MD; Barry F. Uretsky, MD; George A. Stouffer, MD; Christopher R. deFilippi, MD; Edward J. MacInerney, MD; Susan R. Runge, MD; Joann Aaron, MA; Javier Otero, MD; Sandeep Garg, MD; Marschall S. Runge, MD, PhD

JAMA. 1999;282:145-152.

Context  Adverse cardiac events have been reported in patients waiting for either coronary surgery or angioplasty. However, data on the risk of adverse events while awaiting coronary angiography are limited, and none are available from a US population.

Objective  To quantify cardiac outcomes in patients waiting for elective coronary angiography.

Design, Setting, and Participants  Observational cohort study of 381 adult outpatients (mean [SD] age, 55 [12] years; 64% male; 61% white) on a waiting list for coronary angiography at a US tertiary care public teaching hospital during 1993-1994.

Main Outcome Measures  Rates of cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and hospitalizations for unstable angina or heart failure as a function of amount of time spent on a waiting list.

Results  Sixty-six patients were dropped from the waiting list but were included in the study analysis. During a mean (SD) follow-up of 8.4 (6.5) months, cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and hospitalization occurred in 6 (1.6%), 4 (1.0%), and 26 (6.8%) patients, respectively. The probability of events was minimal in the first 2 weeks and increased steadily between 3 and 13 weeks. By Cox multivariate analysis, 2 variables independently identified an increased risk of adverse events: a strongly positive treadmill exercise electrocardiogram or positive stress imaging result at referral (odds ratio [OR], 2.32; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.22-4.16; P=.01) and the use of 2 to 3 anti-ischemic medications (OR, 1.98; 95% CI, 1.19-3.96; P=.04). Among 311 patients who ultimately underwent angiography, those with adverse events had a higher prevalence of coronary disease (96% vs 60%; P<.001), more frequently required revascularization (93% vs 53%; P<.001), and had longer hospital stays (mean [SD], 6.2 [4.3] vs 1.3 [0.7] days; P=.001).

Conclusion  Our data suggest that in a cohort referred for coronary angiography, delaying the procedure places some patients at risk for death, myocardial infarction, unplanned hospitalization, a longer hospital stay, and, potentially, a poorer prognosis. Waits longer than 2 weeks should be avoided, and patients with strongly positive stress test results and those who require 2 to 3 anti-ischemic medications should be prioritized for early intervention.


Author Affiliations: Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston. Drs Rosanio and Tocchi are now with the division of Cardiology, Hospital S Raffaele, Milan, Italy. Dr Cutler is now with The Heart Group, Akron, Ohio. Dr Garg is now with Cardiac Consultants, Tualarin, Ore.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLES

Coronary Angiography: A Long Look at a Short Queue
Thomas B. Graboys
JAMA. 1999;282(2):184-186.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

July 14, 1999
JAMA. 1999;282(2):201-202.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Appropriateness Criteria for Coronary Angiography in Angina: Reliability and Validity
Hemingway et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2008;149:221-231.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Disease progression and adverse events in patients listed for elective percutaneous coronary intervention
Talwar et al.
Postgrad. Med. J. 2005;81:459-462.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The clinical characteristics and investigations planned in patients with stable angina presenting to cardiologists in Europe: from the Euro Heart Survey of Stable Angina
Daly et al.
Eur Heart J 2005;26:996-1010.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Differential Use of Coronary Revascularization and Hospital Mortality Following Acute Myocardial Infarction
Barnhart et al.
Arch Intern Med 2003;163:461-466.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The risks of waiting for cardiac catheterization: a prospective study
Natarajan et al.
CMAJ 2002;167:1233-1240.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Dynamic Analysis of Liver Allocation Policies
Howard
Med Decis Making 2001;21:257-266.
ABSTRACT  

Benchmarking the vital risk of waiting for coronary artery bypass surgery in Ontario
Naylor et al.
CMAJ 2000;162:775-779.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Waiting for Coronary Angiography: Do Delays Increase Risk?
Journal Watch Cardiology 1999;1999:3-3.
FULL TEXT  

Coronary Angiography: A Long Look at a Short Queue
Graboys
JAMA 1999;282:184-186.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1999 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.