This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on ISI (58)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Related letter  • Related articles  • Similar articles in JAMA  Topic Collections  • Medical Ethics  • Statistics and Research Methods  • Human Rights  • Alert me on articles by topic

Beverly Woodward, PhD

JAMA. 1999;282:1947-1952.

United States regulations governing federally supported research with human subjects derive in part from 2 international codes, the Nuremberg Code and the Declaration of Helsinki. The Declaration of Helsinki states that "concern for the interests of the subject must always prevail over the interests of science and society." The concept of minimal risk and the principle of informed consent are the key means by which US federal regulations seek to protect the rights and welfare of the individual in the research setting. Current trends in medical research—including increased funding, ever-greater capabilities of computers, development of new clinical tools that can also be used in research, and new research tools developed through research itself—are creating greater demand for human subjects, for easier recruitment and conscription of these subjects, and for unimpeded access to patient medical records and human biological materials. Nationally and internationally, there are new pressures to subordinate the interests of the subject to those of science and society. The National Bioethics Advisory Commission, which is about to undertake a comprehensive review of the US system of human subject protections, faces a daunting task.

Author Affiliation: Departments of Philosophy and Sociology, Brandeis University, Waltham, Mass.

RELATED LETTER

Protection for Human Subjects in Medical Research
Jeffrey L. Kaufman, Ralph Pelligra, Arthur L. Reingold, David L. Sackett, Harold T. Shapiro, Eric M. Meslin, and Beverly Woodward
JAMA. 2000;283(18):2387-2390.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

RELATED ARTICLES

Keeping Research Subjects Out of Harm's Way
Gary B. Ellis
JAMA. 1999;282(20):1963-1965.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

November 24, 1999
JAMA. 1999;282(20):1979-1980.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Access to medical records for research purposes: varying perceptions across research ethics boards
Willison et al.
J. Med. Ethics 2008;34:308-314.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Continued Controversies: Issues in Mental Health Research and Implications for Nursing
Spath
J Am Psychiatr Nurses Assoc 2007;13:221-229.
ABSTRACT  

Do Research Procedures Pose Relatively Greater Risk for Healthy Persons Than for Persons With Schizophrenia?
Roberts et al.
Schizophr Bull 2006;32:153-158.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Randomized, Controlled Trial of an Easy-to-Read Informed Consent Statement for Clinical Trial Participation: A Study of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group
Coyne et al.
JCO 2003;21:836-842.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Patients' consent preferences for research uses of information in electronic medical records: interview and survey data
Willison et al.
BMJ 2003;326:373-373.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Ethical Oversight of Public Health Research: Can Rules and IRBs Make a Difference in Developing Countries?
London
Am. J. Public Health 2002;92:1079-1084.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Use of Psychiatric Records
GOLDMAN
Am. J. Psychiatry 2001;158:1744-1745.
FULL TEXT  

Ethics behind closed doors: do research ethics committees need secrecy?
Ashcroft and Pfeffer
BMJ 2001;322:1294-1296.
FULL TEXT  

Moving From Compliance to Conscience: Why We Can and Should Improve on the Ethics of Clinical Research
Kahn and Mastroianni
Arch Intern Med 2001;161:925-928.
FULL TEXT  

When is surgery research? Towards an operational definition of human research
Margo
J. Med. Ethics 2001;27:40-43.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Breaking the Camel's Back: Multicenter Clinical Trials and Local Institutional Review Boards
Burman et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2001;134:152-157.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Human Tissue Research in the Genomic Era of Medicine: Balancing Individual and Societal Interests
Ashburn et al.
Arch Intern Med 2000;160:3377-3384.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Selection Bias From Requiring Patients to Give Consent to Examine Data for Health Services Research
Woolf et al.
Arch Fam Med 2000;9:1111-1118.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A new look at international research ethics
Benatar and Singer
BMJ 2000;321:824-826.
FULL TEXT  

Ethics of medical research in developing countries: the role of international codes of conduct
Hutton
Stat Methods Med Res 2000;9:185-206.
ABSTRACT  

Uneasy Alliance -- Clinical Investigators and the Pharmaceutical Industry
Bodenheimer
NEJM 2000;342:1539-1544.
FULL TEXT  

Protection for Human Subjects in Medical Research
Kaufman et al.
JAMA 2000;283:2387-2390.
FULL TEXT  

Keeping Research Subjects Out of Harm's Way
Ellis
JAMA 1999;282:1963-1965.
FULL TEXT