You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 282 No. 3, July 21, 1999 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Original Contribution
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (70)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Genetics
 •Genetic Counseling/ Testing/ Therapy
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Interpretation of Genetic Test Results for Hereditary Nonpolyposis Colorectal Cancer

Implications for Clinical Predisposition Testing

Sapna Syngal, MD, MPH; Edward A. Fox, PhD; Christine Li, MD; Marisa Dovidio, BS; Charis Eng, MD, PhD; Richard D. Kolodner, PhD; Judy E. Garber, MD, MPH

JAMA. 1999;282:247-253.

Context  Genetic testing for cancer predisposition is evolving from purely research applications to affecting clinical management.

Objective  To determine how often genetic test results for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) can be definitively interpreted and used to guide clinical management.

Design  Case-series study conducted in 1996 to 1998 in which a complete sequence analysis of hMSH2 and hMLH1 coding sequence and flanking intronic regions was performed. Mutations were categorized as protein truncating and missense. In the case of missense alterations, additional analyses were performed in an effort to assess pathogenicity.

Setting and Participants  Families were identified by self-referral or health care provider referral to a cancer genetics program. Participants and kindreds were classified into 1 of 4 categories: (1) Amsterdam criteria for HNPCC, (2) modified Amsterdam criteria for HNPCC, (3) young age at onset, or (4) HNPCC-variant. In addition, each proband was classified according to the Bethesda guidelines for identification of individuals with HNPCC.

Main Outcome Measure  Alterations of hMSH2 and hMLH1 genes.

Results  Twenty-seven alterations of hMSH2 and hMLH1 were found in 24 of 70 families (34.3%). Of these, deleterious mutations that could be used with confidence in clinical management were identified in 25.7% (18/70) of families. The rates of definitive results for families fulfilling Amsterdam criteria, modified Amsterdam criteria, young age at onset, HNPCC-variant, and Bethesda guidelines were 27 (39.3%), 13 (18.2%), 12 (16.7%), 11 (15.8%), and 21 (30.4%), respectively. The prevalence of missense mutations, genetic heterogeneity of the syndrome, and limited availability of validated functional assays present a challenge in the interpretation of genetic test results of HNPCC families.

Conclusions  The identification of pathogenic mutations in a significant subset of families for whom the results may have marked clinical importance makes genetic testing an important option for HNPCC and HNPCC-like kindreds. However, for the majority of individuals in whom sequence analysis of hMSH2 and hMLH1 does not give a definitive result, intensive follow-up is still warranted.


Author Affiliations: Division of Gastroenterology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Mass (Dr Syngal); Department of Population Sciences (Drs Syngal and Garber) and Charles A. Dana Human Cancer Genetics Unit (Drs Fox, Li, and Eng, Ms Dovidio), Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass; and the Ludwig Institute of Cancer Research, La Jolla, Calif (Dr Kolodner). Dr Li is now with Millennium Predictive Medicine Inc, Cambridge, Mass. Dr Eng is now with the Clinical Cancer Genetics and Human Cancer Genetics Program, Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLES

Molecular Diagnosis of Hereditary Nonpolyposis Colorectal Cancer
Timothy J. O'Leary
JAMA. 1999;282(3):281-282.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

July 21, 1999
JAMA. 1999;282(3):295-296.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Comprehensive Molecular Analysis of Mismatch Repair Gene Defects in Suspected Lynch Syndrome (Hereditary Nonpolyposis Colorectal Cancer) Cases
Mueller et al.
Cancer Res. 2009;69:7053-7061.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Colorectal Cancer Risk Perception on the Basis of Genetic Test Results in Individuals at Risk for Lynch Syndrome
Grover et al.
JCO 2009;27:3981-3986.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Functional Analysis of Human MLH1 Variants Using Yeast and In vitro Mismatch Repair Assays
Takahashi et al.
Cancer Res. 2007;67:4595-4604.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Genotype-Phenotype Comparison of German MLH1 and MSH2 Mutation Carriers Clinically Affected With Lynch Syndrome: A Report by the German HNPCC Consortium
Goecke et al.
JCO 2006;24:4285-4292.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Refining the Amsterdam Criteria and Bethesda Guidelines: Testing Algorithms for the Prediction of Mismatch Repair Mutation Status in the Familial Cancer Clinic
Lipton et al.
JCO 2004;22:4934-4943.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Human MutL homolog (MLH1) function in DNA mismatch repair: a prospective screen for missense mutations in the ATPase domain
Ellison et al.
Nucleic Acids Res 2004;32:5321-5338.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Hereditary Nonpolyposis Colorectal Cancer Syndrome: Genetics and Clinical Implications
Chung and Rustgi
ANN INTERN MED 2003;138:560-570.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Frequent genomic disorganisation of MLH1 in hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) screened by RT-PCR on puromycin treated samples
Sumitsuji et al.
J. Med. Genet. 2003;40:e30-30.
FULL TEXT  

Mismatch Repair Genes hMLH1 and hMSH2 and Colorectal Cancer: A HuGE Review
Mitchell et al.
Am J Epidemiol 2002;156:885-902.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Genetics of Colorectal Cancer
Calvert and Frucht
ANN INTERN MED 2002;137:603-612.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Guidance on gastrointestinal surveillance for hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer, familial adenomatous polypolis, juvenile polyposis, and Peutz-Jeghers syndrome
Dunlop
Gut 2002;51:v21-27.
FULL TEXT  

A Hereditary Nonpolyposis Colorectal Carcinoma Case Associated with Hypermethylation of the MLH1 Gene in Normal Tissue and Loss of Heterozygosity of the Unmethylated Allele in the Resulting Microsatellite Instability-High Tumor
Gazzoli et al.
Cancer Res. 2002;62:3925-3928.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Evaluation of Microsatellite Instability and Immunohistochemistry for the Prediction of Germ-Line MSH2 and MLH1 Mutations in Hereditary Nonpolyposis Colon Cancer Families
Wahlberg et al.
Cancer Res. 2002;62:3485-3492.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Pathogenicity of missense and splice site mutations in hMSH2 and hMLH1 mismatch repair genes: implications for genetic testing
Cravo et al.
Gut 2002;50:405-412.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Bethesda Guidelines: Relation to Microsatellite Instability and MLH1 Promoter Methylation in Patients with Colorectal Cancer
Raedle et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2001;135:566-576.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Cost-Effectiveness of Microsatellite Instability Screening as a Method for Detecting Hereditary Nonpolyposis Colorectal Cancer
Ramsey et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2001;135:577-588.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Selective Radiosensitization of Drug-resistant MutS Homologue-2 (MSH2) Mismatch Repair-deficient Cells by Halogenated Thymidine (dThd) Analogues: Msh2 Mediates dThd Analogue DNA Levels and the Differential Cytotoxicity and Cell Cycle Effects of the dThd Analogues and 6-Thioguanine
Berry et al.
Cancer Res. 2000;60:5773-5780.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Sensitivity and specificity of clinical criteria for hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer associated mutations in MSH2 and MLH1
Syngal et al.
J. Med. Genet. 2000;37:641-645.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

DNA mismatch repair genes and colorectal cancer
WHEELER et al.
Gut 2000;47:148-153.
FULL TEXT  

Hereditary Nonpolyposis Colorectal Cancer: A Call for Attention
Syngal
JCO 2000;18:2189-2192.
FULL TEXT  

Patient and Tumor Characteristics of Colon Cancers with Microsatellite Instability: A Population-based Study
Chao et al.
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 2000;9:539-544.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Genetic, Immunohistochemical, and Clinical Features of Medullary Carcinoma of the Pancreas : A Newly Described and Characterized Entity
Wilentz et al.
Am. J. Pathol. 2000;156:1641-1651.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Functional Genomics: Clinical Effect and the Evolving Role of the Surgeon
Hernandez and Evers
Arch Surg 1999;134:1209-1215.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Germ-line msh6 Mutations in Colorectal Cancer Families
Kolodner et al.
Cancer Res. 1999;59:5068-5074.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Molecular Diagnosis of Hereditary Nonpolyposis Colorectal Cancer
O'Leary
JAMA 1999;282:281-282.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1999 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.