You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 282 No. 7, August 18, 1999 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Original Contribution
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (44)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Bacterial Infections
 •Patient Education/ Health Literacy
 •Randomized Controlled Trial
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Use of a Low-Literacy Patient Education Tool to Enhance Pneumococcal Vaccination Rates

A Randomized Controlled Trial

Terry A. Jacobson, MD; Donna M. Thomas, MPH; Felicia James Morton, MSPH; Gardiner Offutt, RN, MPH; Jennifer Shevlin, MSPH; Susan Ray, MD

JAMA. 1999;282:646-650.

Context  Pneumococcal immunization rates for elderly and high-risk patients are only one third to one half the target rate of 60% established by the US Public Health Service. Limited or marginal literacy, which affects nearly 100 million Americans, especially the elderly, may contribute to these low rates of immunization.

Objective  To determine whether the use of a simple, low-literacy educational tool enhances patient-physician dialogue about pneumococcal vaccination and increases rates of immunization.

Design  A randomized controlled trial conducted between May and June of 1998.

Setting  Ambulatory care clinic of a 900-bed public teaching hospital serving a predominantly indigent, low-literate, African American, inner-city population.

Participants  Of 433 patients who presented for routine primary care, had vaccine indications (age >=65 years or chronic disease), and had not been previously vaccinated, 221 were randomly assigned to the intervention group and 212 to the control group. Of the total patient population (mean age, 63 years), 280 (64.7%) had less than a high school education, 401 (92.6%) were African American, and 300 (69.3%) were female.

Intervention  One-page, low-literacy (below fifth-grade level) educational handout encouraging patients to "ask your doctor about the pneumonia shot" vs a control group (1-page, low-literacy educational handout conveying information about nutrition).

Main Outcome Measures  Vaccination rates (documented by chart audit) of patients who received pneumococcal vaccination and rates of patients who self-reported having discussed vaccination with their physicians.

Results  Patients in the intervention group were 4 times more likely to have discussed the pneumococcal vaccine with their physicians than patients in the control group (87/221 [39.4%] vs 21/212 [9.9%]; relative risk [RR], 3.97 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 2.71-5.83]), and were more than 5 times as likely to have received the pneumococcal vaccine than the control group (44/221 [19.9%] vs 8/212 [3.8%]; RR, 5.28 [95% CI, 2.80-9.93]). In a multivariate analysis controlling for race, sex, education, insurance status, age, level of physician training, health status, and vaccine indication, only assignment to the intervention group was statistically significantly related to the probability of being immunized or discussing the issue with their physicians (P<.001 for both trends).

Conclusions  A simple, low-literacy educational tool increased pneumococcal vaccination rates and patient-physician discussions about the vaccine in an elderly, low-literate, indigent, minority population.


Author Affiliations: Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine (Drs Jacobson and Ray and Ms Thomas), The Office of Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, Grady Health System (Dr Jacobson and Ms Morton), The Atlanta Veterans Affairs Medical Center (Mss Offutt and Shevlin), and the Georgia Emerging Infections Program (Mss Thomas, Offutt, and Shevlin and Dr Ray), Atlanta, Ga.


RELATED ARTICLE

August 18, 1999
JAMA. 1999;282(7):701-702.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Community Development Model for Public Health Applications: Overview of a Model to Eliminate Population Disparities
Robinson
Health Promot Pract 2005;6:338-346.
ABSTRACT  

Assessing medication adherence self-efficacy among low-literacy patients: development of a pictographic visual analogue scale
Kalichman et al.
Health Educ Res 2005;20:24-35.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Functional Health Literacy and Medication Use: the Pharmacist's Role
Youmans and Schillinger
The Annals of Pharmacotherapy 2003;37:1726-1729.
FULL TEXT  

Potential Burden of Universal Influenza Vaccination of Young Children on Visits to Primary Care Practices
Szilagyi et al.
Pediatrics 2003;112:821-828.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Functional Health Literacy and the Risk of Hospital Admission Among Medicare Managed Care Enrollees
Baker et al.
Am. J. Public Health 2002;92:1278-1283.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A Computerized Reminder System to Increase the Use of Preventive Care for Hospitalized Patients
Dexter et al.
NEJM 2001;345:965-970.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Health Literacy: A Nonissue in the 2000 Presidential Election
ROGERS et al.
American Behavioral Scientist 2001;44:2172-2195.
ABSTRACT  

The Evolving Roles of Patient and Physician
Lang
Arch Fam Med 2000;9:65-67.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1999 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.