You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 282 No. 9, September 1, 1999 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Special Communication
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (20)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Review of US Medical School Finances, 1997-1998

Jack Y. Krakower, PhD; Donna J. Williams, MA; Robert F. Jones, PhD

JAMA. 1999;282:847-854.

Based on data from the Annual Medical School Questionnaire of the Liaison Committee on Medical Education (LCME), to which 100% of schools responded, we found that revenue supporting programs and activities of the 125 accredited medical schools in the United States totaled $36,997 million in 1997-1998. A large proportion of revenue (79%) was derived from 3 sources: practice plans ($12,559 million; 33.9%), grants and contracts ($10,916 million; 29.5%), and hospital support ($5741 million; 15.5%). An analysis of revenue trends revealed that medical schools, in aggregate, have continued to experience growth during the last 2 years. However, the aggregate numbers mask considerable variation among schools with regard to changes in financing. Between 1995-1996 and 1996-1997, 46 schools (37%) reported constant-dollar declines in the sum of practice plan and hospital revenue, and 50 schools (40%) reported a decline from 1996-1997 to 1997-1998. The financial data reviewed in this report demonstrate the continued dependence of medical schools on faculty-generated sources of revenue and confirm the perception that a growing number of medical schools are experiencing reductions in key sources of financial support. Current and projected reductions in teaching hospital revenue due to the implementation of the Balanced Budget Amendment are expected to erode further hospital support for medical school programs and activities.


Author Affiliations: Section for Institutional and Faculty Studies, Association of American Medical Colleges, Washington, DC.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

September 1, 1999
JAMA. 1999;282(9):909-910.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Final Report of the FOPE II Financing of Pediatric Education Workgroup
Jones Jr. et al.
Pediatrics 2000;106:1256e-1256.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Educational Programs in US Medical Schools, 1999-2000
Barzansky et al.
JAMA 2000;284:1114-1120.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Review of US Medical School Finances, 1998-1999
Krakower et al.
JAMA 2000;284:1127-1129.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Trends in US Medical School Faculty Salaries, 1988-1989 to 1998-1999
Studer-Ellis et al.
JAMA 2000;284:1130-1135.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1999 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.