 |
|
Graduate Medical Education, 1998-1999
A Closer Look
Rebecca S. Miller, MS;
Marvin R. Dunn, MD;
Thomas Richter, MA
JAMA. 1999;282:855-860.
Despite the ever-present risk of a critical imbalance in the physician workforce total numbers and specialty distribution, no systematic planning mechanism is in place. Furthermore, the length of training for graduate medical education (GME) precludes timely rectification of imbalances. We report GME activities collected in the American Medical Association Annual Survey of Graduate Medical Education Programs for 1998-1999, along with trends during the last 3 to 6 years. These data initially suggest that little has changed during the past several years; however, on closer examination, small but significant changes during the past 2 years may have serious consequences if continued. The total number of resident physicians, which has been constant during the last several years, decreased in 1998 by 760 from the previous year, while the number of programs continues to increase (6.1% since 1993). The number of US medical graduates entering GME programs remained stable during the last 6 years, the number of osteopathic graduates entering GME increased by 55.7%, and the number of international medical graduates (IMGs) entering GME continued to drop (down 13.2% since 1993). More IMGs tend to pursue additional training than do US graduates (in 1997, 32.9% vs 23.6%). Because IMGs are remaining in GME programs for longer periods, the total number of IMGs has not yet reflected significant change. About 62% of IMGs now entering GME training are either US citizens or permanent residents; ethnic minority residents are not decreasing in numbers as some predicted; and for the first time in the past 5 years, the primary care specialties have ceased their persistent growth. Toward the end of GME, the number of residents leaving programs before completion increased by 5.7% during the last 3 years. While some of these changes may be ascribed to reduced GME funding through the Balanced Budget Act of 1997, other factors clearly are at play. To anticipate future changes in the physician workforce, these factors should be identified to permit them to be monitored and modified as needed.
Author Affiliations: Operations and Data Analysis (Ms Miller), and Residency Review Committee (Dr Dunn), Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education, and Division of Graduate Medical Education, American Medical Association (Mr Richter) Chicago, Ill. During 1998, Ms Miller was employed in the Division of Graduate Medical Education at the American Medical Association.
RELATED ARTICLES
Graduate Medical Education
JAMA. 1999;282(9):893-906.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
September 1, 1999
JAMA. 1999;282(9):909-910.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
|
Adult Nephrology Fellowship Training in the United States: Trends and Issues
Rosenberg
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2007;18:1027-1033.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
US Graduate Medical Education, 2003-2004
Brotherton et al.
JAMA 2004;292:1032-1037.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Will neurology residents with large student loan debts become academicians?
Doherty et al.
Neurology 2002;58:495-497.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
The evolution of women as physicians and surgeons
Burrow and Burgess
Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2001;71:S27-29.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Final Report of the FOPE II Financing of Pediatric Education Workgroup
Jones Jr. et al.
Pediatrics 2000;106:1256e-1256.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
US Graduate Medical Education, 1999-2000
Brotherton et al.
JAMA 2000;284:1121-1126.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
The Case for More U.S. Medical Students
Mullan
NEJM 2000;343:213-217.
FULL TEXT
|
