You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 283 No. 10, March 8, 2000 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Original Contribution
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (109)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Monitoring Osteoporosis Therapy With Bone Densitometry

Misleading Changes and Regression to the Mean

Steven R. Cummings, MD; Lisa Palermo, MA; Warren Browner, MD; Robert Marcus, MD; Robert Wallace, MD; Jim Pearson, BS; Terri Blackwell, MA; Stephen Eckert, PhD; Dennis Black, PhD; for the Fracture Intervention Trial Research Group

JAMA. 2000;283:1318-1321.

Context  The principle of "regression to the mean" predicts that patients with unusual responses to treatment might represent outliers who are likely to have more typical responses if treatment is continued without change.

Objective  To test whether women who lose bone mineral density (BMD) during the first year of treatment for osteoporosis continue to lose BMD if the same treatment is continued beyond 1 year.

Design and Setting  Two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials in 11 US clinical research centers for the Fracture Intervention Trial and 180 centers in the United States and other countries for the Multiple Outcomes of Raloxifene Evaluation Trial.

Participants and Interventions  Postmenopausal women with low BMD assigned to treatment with 5 mg/d of alendronate sodium in the Fracture Intervention Trial who completed 2 years of BMD monitoring and adhered to study medication (n = 2634), and postmenopausal women with osteoporosis assigned to treatment with 60 or 120 mg/d of raloxifene hydrochloride in the Multiple Outcomes of Raloxifene Evaluation trial who similarly completed 2 years of monitoring while adhering to study medication (n = 3954).

Main Outcome Measures  Baseline, 12-, and 24-month hip and spine BMD.

Results  Women with the greatest loss of BMD during the first year of treatment were the most likely to gain BMD during continued treatment. Specifically, among women taking alendronate whose hip BMD decreased by more than 4% during the first year, 83% (95% confidence interval [CI], 82%-84%)had increases in hip BMD during the second year, with an overall mean increase of 4.7%. In contrast, those who seemed to gain at least 8% during the first year lost an average of 1% (95% CI, 0.1%-1.9%) during the next year. Similar results were observed among women taking raloxifene for 2 years.

Conclusions  Our data suggest that most women who lose BMD during the first year of treatment with alendronate or raloxifene will gain BMD if the same treatment is continued for a second year. These results illustrate the principle of regression to the mean and suggest that effective treatments for osteoporosis should not be changed because of loss of BMD during the first year of use.


Author Affiliations: Departments of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (Drs Cummings and Black, Ms Palermo, and Mr Pearson), and Medicine (Drs Cummings and Browner and Ms Blackwell), University of California, San Francisco; Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Palo Alto, Calif (Dr Marcus); Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City (Dr Wallace); and Eli Lilly & Co, Indianapolis, Ind (Dr Eckert).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

March 8, 2000
JAMA. 2000;283(10):1361-1362.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Value of routine monitoring of bone mineral density after starting bisphosphonate treatment: secondary analysis of trial data
Bell et al.
BMJ 2009;338:b2266-b2266.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Prediction of Changes in Bone Mineral Density in Postmenopausal Women Treated with Once-Weekly Bisphosphonates
Burnett-Bowie et al.
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2009;94:1097-1103.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Use of randomised trials to decide when to monitor response to new treatment
Bell et al.
BMJ 2008;336:361-365.
FULL TEXT  

Relationship between Bone Mineral Density Changes and Fracture Risk Reduction in Patients Treated with Strontium Ranelate
Bruyere et al.
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2007;92:3076-3081.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A 55-Year-Old Woman With Osteopenia
Cummings
JAMA 2006;296:2601-2610.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Principles of Diagnosing and Managing Postmenopausal Osteoporosis for the Podiatric Physician
McGarry and Cyr
J. Am. Podiatr. Med. Assoc. 2004;94:187-193.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Acute and long-term management of patients with vertebral fractures
Francis et al.
QJM 2004;97:63-74.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Effect of regression to the mean on decision making in health care
Morton and Torgerson
BMJ 2003;326:1083-1084.
FULL TEXT  

Evaluation of calcaneus bone densitometry against hip and spine for diagnosis of osteoporosis
Williams and Daymond
Br. J. Radiol. 2003;76:123-128.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Raloxifene administration in post-menopausal women with osteoporosis: effect of different BsmI vitamin D receptor genotypes
Palomba et al.
Hum Reprod 2003;18:192-198.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Clinical Use of Bone Densitometry: Scientific Review
Cummings et al.
JAMA 2002;288:1889-1897.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Osteoporosis
Tuck and Francis
Postgrad. Med. J. 2002;78:526-532.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Changes in Bone Density and Turnover Explain the Reductions in Incidence of Nonvertebral Fractures that Occur during Treatment with Antiresorptive Agents
Hochberg et al.
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2002;87:1586-1592.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Antiresorptive Treatment of Postmenopausal Osteoporosis: Comparison of Study Designs and Outcomes in Large Clinical Trials with Fracture as an Endpoint
Marcus et al.
Endocr. Rev. 2002;23:16-37.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Prevention of Bone Loss with Tibolone in Postmenopausal Women: Results of Two Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Dose-Finding Studies
Gallagher et al.
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2001;86:4717-4726.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Probabilities and Realities
Bonnick
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2001;86:4002-4002.
FULL TEXT  

Bone Density Regression to the Mean and the Individual Patient
Cummings and Parfitt
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2001;86:4001-4002.
FULL TEXT  

Diagnosis and Care of Patients with Anorexia Nervosa in Primary Care Settings
Mehler
ANN INTERN MED 2001;134:1048-1059.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Monitoring Osteoporosis Therapy with Bone Densitometry: A Vital Tool or Regression toward Mediocrity?
Bonnick
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2000;85:3493-3495.
FULL TEXT  

Early Changes in Serum N-Telopeptide and C-Telopeptide Cross-Linked Collagen Type 1 Predict Long-Term Response to Alendronate Therapy in Elderly Women
Greenspan et al.
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2000;85:3537-3540.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2000 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.