You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 283 No. 14, April 12, 2000 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Original Contribution
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (91)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Medical Practice
 •Medical Practice, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Physician Manipulation of Reimbursement Rules for Patients

Between a Rock and a Hard Place

Matthew K. Wynia, MD, MPH; Deborah S. Cummins, PhD; Jonathan B. VanGeest, PhD; Ira B. Wilson, MD, MSc

JAMA. 2000;283:1858-1865.

Context  Health plan utilization review rules are intended to enforce insurance contracts and can alter and constrain the services that physicians provide to their patients. Physicians can manipulate these rules, but how often they do so is unknown.

Objective  To determine the frequency with which physicians manipulate reimbursement rules to obtain coverage for services they perceive as necessary, and the physician attitudes and personal and practice characteristics associated with these manipulations.

Design, Setting, and Participants  A random national sample of 1124 practicing physicians was surveyed by mail in 1998; the response rate was 64% (n = 720).

Main Outcome Measure  Use of 3 different tactics "sometimes" or more often in the last year: (1) exaggerating the severity of patients' conditions; (2) changing patients' billing diagnoses; and/or (3) reporting signs or symptoms that patients did not have to help the patients secure coverage for needed care.

Results  Thirty-nine percent of physicians reported using at least 1 tactic "sometimes" or more often in the last year. In multivariate models comparing these physicians with physicians who "never" or "rarely" used any of these tactics, physicians using these tactics were more likely to (1) believe that "gaming the system" is necessary to provide high-quality care today (odds ratio [OR], 3.67; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.54-5.29); (2) have received requests from patients to deceive insurers (OR, 2.44; 95% CI, 1.72-3.45); (3) feel pressed for time during patient visits (OR, 1.69; 95% CI, 1.21-2.37); and (4) have more than 25% of their patients covered by Medicaid (OR, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.08-2.38). Notably, greater worry about prosecution for fraud did not affect physicians' use of these tactics (P = .34). Of those reporting using these tactics, 54% reported doing so more often now than 5 years ago.

Conclusions  A sizable minority of physicians report manipulating reimbursement rules so patients can receive care that physicians perceive is necessary. Unless novel strategies are developed to address this, greater utilization restrictions in the health care system are likely to increase physicians' use of such manipulative "covert advocacy" tactics.


Author Affiliations: Institute for Ethics, American Medical Association, Chicago, Ill (Drs Wynia, Cummins, and VanGeest); and the Division of Clinical Care Research, New England Medical Center, Boston, Mass (Dr Wilson).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLES

Fidelity and Deceit at the Bedside
M. Gregg Bloche
JAMA. 2000;283(14):1881-1884.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

April 12, 2000
JAMA. 2000;283(14):1905-1906.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Perspective--Professional Work: The Emergence of Collaborative Community
Adler et al.
Organization Science 2008;19:359-376.
ABSTRACT  

What Cannot Be Said on Television About Health Care
Emanuel
JAMA 2007;297:2131-2133.
FULL TEXT  

Illness related deception: social or psychiatric problem?
Bass and Halligan
JRSM 2007;100:81-84.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Ensuring fairness in coverage decisions: Applying the American Medical Association Ethical Force Program's consensus report to managed care pharmacy.
Teagarden and Wynia
Am J Health Syst Pharm 2006;63:1749-1754.
FULL TEXT  

What Is the Empirical Basis for Paying for Quality in Health Care?
Rosenthal and Frank
Med Care Res Rev 2006;63:135-157.
ABSTRACT  

Appeals System and Its Outcomes in National Health Insurance in Taiwan
Lin et al.
The Annals of Pharmacotherapy 2006;40:506-511.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Clinical Decision Making during Public Health Emergencies: Ethical Considerations
Lo and Katz
ANN INTERN MED 2005;143:493-498.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Physicians' Responses to Resource Constraints
Hurst et al.
Arch Intern Med 2005;165:639-644.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Occupational Burden of Mental Disorders in the U.S. Military: Psychiatric Hospitalizations, Involuntary Separations, and Disability
Hoge et al.
Am. J. Psychiatry 2005;162:585-591.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Does Health Insurance Coverage of Office Visits Influence Colorectal Cancer Testing?
Varghese et al.
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 2005;14:744-747.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Physician Conceptions of Responsibility to Individual Patients and Distributive Justice in Health Care
Beach et al.
Ann Fam Med 2005;3:53-59.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Physicians' Interactions With Third-Party Payers: Is Deception Necessary?
Bogardus et al.
Arch Intern Med 2004;164:1841-1844.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Assessing the Influence of Incentives on Physicians and Medical Groups
Town et al.
Med Care Res Rev 2004;61:80S-118S.
ABSTRACT  

Ethics in Practice: Managed Care and the Changing Health Care Environment: Medicine as a Profession Managed Care Ethics Working Group Statement
Povar et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2004;141:131-136.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

How to make a silk purse from a sow's ear--a comprehensive review of strategies to optimise data for corrupt managers and incompetent clinicians
Pitches et al.
BMJ 2003;327:1436-1439.
FULL TEXT  

Physicians Facing Coverage Restrictions
Ignagni and Wynia
Health Aff (Millwood) 2003;22:283-284.
FULL TEXT  

Do Physicians Not Offer Useful Services Because Of Coverage Restrictions?
Wynia et al.
Health Aff (Millwood) 2003;22:190-197.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Support for Physician Deception of Insurance Companies among a Sample of Philadelphia Residents
Alexander et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2003;138:472-475.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Coding of Pediatric Behavioral and Mental Disorders
Rushton et al.
Pediatrics 2002;110:e8-8.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Measuring Deception: Test-Retest Reliability of Physicians' Self-Reported Manipulation of Reimbursement Rules for Patients
VanGeest et al.
Med Care Res Rev 2002;59:184-196.
ABSTRACT  

The "Hassle Factor": What Motivates Physicians to Manipulate Reimbursement Rules?
Werner et al.
Arch Intern Med 2002;162:1134-1139.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Deceiving insurance companies: new expression of an ancient tradition
Sade
Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2001;72:1449-1453.
FULL TEXT  

Should Physicians Manipulate Reimbursement Rules to Benefit Patients?
O'Neal et al.
JAMA 2000;284:1382-1383.
FULL TEXT  

The Factuality of Health Records
Fusaro et al.
Arch Intern Med 2000;160:2224-2225.
FULL TEXT  

Fidelity and Deceit at the Bedside
Bloche
JAMA 2000;283:1881-1884.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2000 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.