You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 283 No. 18, May 10, 2000 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Policy Perspectives
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (16)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Immunology
 •Immunology, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati
What's this?

Payment for Immunosuppression After Organ Transplantation

Bertram L. Kasiske, MD; David Cohen, MD; Michael R. Lucey, MD; John F. Neylan, MD; for the American Society of Transplantation

JAMA. 2000;283:2445-2450.

Dramatic improvements in organ transplantation have meant that a growing number of patients must take expensive immunosuppressive medications for the rest of their lives. Currently, Medicare covers most transplantation procedures in the United States, but ends coverage for outpatient immunosuppressive medications after 36 months. Evidence suggests that at least some patients have reduced immunosuppression and their transplants fail because they cannot afford these medication costs. In the years since the advent of effective immunosuppressive therapy, the US Congress has struggled with this issue, and in 1999 temporarily extended medication coverage for eligible patients (based on age and disability) by 8 months. However, a more permanent solution is needed. We advocate that Medicare should cover the cost of all immunosuppressive therapy for all solid organ transplant recipients who cannot afford to pay. A number of potentially cost-effective approaches could be taken, but, in any case, something must be done to ensure that transplants do not fail because recipients cannot pay for immunosuppression.


Author Affiliations: Department of Medicine, Hennepin County Medical Center, Minneapolis, Minn (Dr Kasiske); Department of Medicine, Columbia Presbyterian Medical Center, New York, NY (Dr Cohen); Division of Gastroenterology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (Dr Lucey); and Division of Nephrology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Ga (Dr Neylan).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Ethnic advantages in kidney transplant outcomes: the Hispanic Paradox at work?
Gordon and Caicedo
Nephrol Dial Transplant 2009;24:1103-1109.
FULL TEXT  

Mindfulness meditation training to reduce symptom distress in transplant patients: rationale, design, and experience with a recycled waitlist
Gross et al.
Clin Trials 2009;6:76-89.
ABSTRACT  

Medicare from A to D: What Every Nephrologist Needs to Know
Morrison
CJASN 2008;3:899-904.
FULL TEXT  

Preemptive Kidney Transplantation: The Advantage and the Advantaged
Kasiske et al.
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2002;13:1358-1364.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Renal Transplantation in Black Americans
Young and Gaston
NEJM 2000;343:1545-1552.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2000 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.