 |
|
Effectiveness of Automatic Shoulder Belt Systems in Motor Vehicle Crashes
Frederick P. Rivara, MD, MPH;
Thomas D. Koepsell, MD, MPH;
David C. Grossman, MD, MPH;
Charles Mock, MD, PhD
JAMA. 2000;283:2826-2828.
Context Approximately 10 million cars with automatic shoulder belt systems are currently in use in the United States. However, reports on the effectiveness of such restraints have yielded conflicting results.
Objective To determine the effectiveness of automatic shoulder belt systems in reducing the risk of injury and death among front-seat passenger vehicle occupants.
Design, Setting, and Subjects Analysis of data collected from the 1993-1996 National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Crashworthiness Data System on front-seat occupants involved in 25,811 tow-away crashes of passenger cars, light trucks, vans, and sport utility vehicles.
Main Outcome Measures Death and serious injury to specific body areas by use of manual lap and shoulder belts, automatic shoulder belts with manual lap belts, or automatic shoulder belts without lap belts, compared with no restraint use.
Results Use of automatic shoulder belts without lap belts was associated with a decrease in the risk of death vs no restraint use but was not statistically significant for all crashes (odds ratio [OR], 0.66; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.42-1.06) or for frontal crashes (OR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.38-1.35) after adjustment for occupant age, sex, vehicle year, airbag deployment, estimated change in vehicle speed during the crash, and principal direction of force. This association was significantly weaker than the 86% lower risk observed for use of automatic shoulder belts with lap belts (OR, 0.14; 95% CI, 0.07-0.26 vs no restraint; P<.05). Use of automatic shoulder belts without lap belts was associated with an increased risk of serious chest (OR, 2.66; 95% CI, 1.11-6.35) and abdominal (OR, 2.06; 95% CI, 1.004-4.22) injuries for all crashes.
Conclusions These data indicate that improperly used automatic restraint systems may be less effective than properly used systems and are associated with an increased risk of serious chest and abdominal injuries. Given the continued widespread use of these automatic systems, educational programs may be warranted.
Author Affiliations: Harborview Injury Prevention and Research Center (Drs Rivara, Koepsell, Grossman, and Mock), the Departments of Epidemiology (Drs Rivara, Koepsell, and Mock), Pediatrics (Drs Rivara and Grossman), Surgery (Dr Mock), and Health Services (Drs Koepsell and Grossman), University of Washington, and the Crash Injury Research and Engineering Network (Drs Rivara, Grossman, and Mock), Seattle.
 CiteULike  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati  Twitter
What's this?
RELATED ARTICLE
June 7, 2000
JAMA. 2000;283(21):2861-2862.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
|
Association of age, sex and seat belt use with the risk of early death in drivers of passenger cars involved in traffic crashes
Lardelli-Claret et al.
Int J Epidemiol 2009;38:1128-1134.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
International survey of seat belt use exemptions.
Weiss et al.
Inj. Prev. 2006;12:258-261.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Risk Factors for Motor Vehicle Collision-Related Eye Injuries
McGwin and Owsley
Arch Ophthalmol 2005;123:89-95.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Risk of injury for occupants of motor vehicle collisions from unbelted occupants
MacLennan et al.
Inj. Prev. 2004;10:363-367.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Lost working days, productivity, and restraint use among occupants of motor vehicles that crashed in the United States
Ebel et al.
Inj. Prev. 2004;10:314-319.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Bias in estimates of seat belt effectiveness
Koepsell et al.
Inj. Prev. 2003;9:91-92.
FULL TEXT
Bias in estimates of seat belt effectiveness
Robertson
Inj. Prev. 2002;8:263-263.
FULL TEXT
Behavior Change Counseling in the Emergency Department to Reduce Injury Risk: A Randomized, Controlled Trial
Johnston et al.
Pediatrics 2002;110:267-274.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|
