You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 283 No. 23, June 21, 2000 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  The Rational Clinical Examination
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Correction
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (57)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related letter
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Musculoskeletal Syndromes (Chronic Fatigue, Gulf War)
 •Neurology
 •Diagnosis
 •The Rational Clinical Examination
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Does This Patient Have Carpal Tunnel Syndrome?

Christopher A. D'Arcy, MD; Steven McGee, MD

JAMA. 2000;283:3110-3117.

Context  History taking and physical examination maneuvers, including Tinel and Phalen signs, are widely used for the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS).

Objective  To systematically review the precision and accuracy of history taking and physical examination in diagnosing CTS in adults.

Data Sources  English-language literature was searched using MEDLINE (January 1966-February 2000) as well as bibliographies of relevant articles.

Study Selection  Studies of patients presenting to clinicians with symptoms suggestive of CTS in which findings from clearly described physical examination maneuvers were independently compared with electrodiagnostic testing. Twelve of 42 initially identified articles met these criteria and were included in the review.

Data Extraction  Two authors independently reviewed and abstracted data from all of the articles and reached consensus about any discrepancies.

Data Synthesis  In patients presenting with hand dysesthesias, the findings that best distinguish between patients with electrodiagnostic evidence of CTS and patients without it are hypalgesia in the median nerve territory (likelihood ratio [LR], 3.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.0-5.1), classic or probable Katz hand diagram results (LR, 2.4; 95% CI, 1.6-3.5), and weak thumb abduction strength (LR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.4-2.3). Findings that argue against the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome are unlikely Katz hand diagram results (LR, 0.2; 95% CI, 0.0-0.7) and normal thumb abduction strength (LR, 0.5; 95% CI, 0.4-0.7). Several traditional findings of CTS have little or no diagnostic value, including nocturnal paresthesias; Phalen and Tinel signs; thenar atrophy; and 2-point, vibratory, and monofilament sensory testing. Other less commonly used maneuvers, including the square wrist sign, flick sign, and closed fist sign, require validation by other studies before they can be recommended.

Conclusions  Hand symptom diagrams, hypalgesia, and thumb abduction strength testing are helpful in the establishing electrodiagnosis of CTS. The utility of these results is limited, however, by problems inherent in using nerve conduction studies as a criterion standard.


Author Affiliations: University of Washington Health Sciences Center (Dr D'Arcy) and University of Washington, Seattle-Puget Sound Veterans Affairs Health Care System (Dr McGee), Seattle.


RELATED LETTER

Clinical Diagnosis of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
Susan E. Mackinnon, Christine B. Novak, William M. Landau, Richard F. LeBlond, Christopher A. D'Arcy, and Steven McGee
JAMA. 2000;284(15):1924-1925.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

RELATED ARTICLE

June 21, 2000
JAMA. 2000;283(23):3135.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Impact of compensation on work outcome of carpal tunnel syndrome
Sperka et al.
Occup Med (Lond) 2008;0:kqn099v1-kqn099.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Current Practice in the Use of Nerve Conduction Studies in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome by Surgeons in the Netherlands
CLAES et al.
J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2007;32:663-667.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

CarpalTunnel Syndrome - Adduction versus Abduction.
Horst
Clin Med Res 2006;4:160-160.
FULL TEXT  

Jules Tinel (1879-1952) and Paul Hoffmann (1884-1962)
Sansone et al.
Clin Med Res 2006;4:85-89.
FULL TEXT  

Hard work never hurt anyone: or did it? A review of occupational associations with soft tissue musculoskeletal disorders of the neck and upper limb
Walker-Bone and Cooper
Ann Rheum Dis 2005;64:1391-1396.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Hard work never hurt anyone--or did it? A review of occupational associations with soft tissue musculoskeletal disorders of the neck and upper limb
Walker-Bone and Cooper
Ann Rheum Dis 2005;64:1112-1117.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: Diagnostic Usefulness of Sonography
Wong et al.
Radiology 2004;232:93-99.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A Bayesian argument against rigid cut-offs in electrodiagnosis of median neuropathy at the wrist
Nodera et al.
Neurology 2003;60:458-464.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Splinting vs Surgery in the Treatment of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Gerritsen et al.
JAMA 2002;288:1245-1251.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
Katz and Simmons
NEJM 2002;346:1807-1812.
FULL TEXT  

Recent developments: Recent developments in neurology
Wiebe and Nicolle
BMJ 2002;324:656-660.
FULL TEXT  

Nerve Conduction Studies for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: Essential Prelude to Surgery or Unnecessary Luxury?
SMITH
J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2002;27:83-85.
ABSTRACT  

Review: hand symptom diagrams, weak thumb abduction, and hypalgesia are helpful in diagnosing carpal tunnel syndrome
Haines and Kennedy
Evid. Based Med. 2001;6:94-94.
FULL TEXT  

Clinical examination for carpal tunnel syndrome
Best
CMAJ 2001;164:1279-1280.
FULL TEXT  

Clinical Diagnosis of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
Mackinnon et al.
JAMA 2000;284:1924-1925.
FULL TEXT  

Utility of the clinical examination for carpal tunnel syndrome
Myers
CMAJ 2000;163:605-605.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2000 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.