You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 283 No. 5, February 2, 2000 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Clinical Cardiology
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (58)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in JAMA

Sex Differences in Evaluation and Outcome of Unstable Angina

Véronique L. Roger, MD, MPH; Michael E. Farkouh, MD; Susan A. Weston, MS; Guy S. Reeder, MD; Steven J. Jacobsen, MD, PhD; Alan R. Zinsmeister, PhD; Barbara P. Yawn, MD, MSc; Stephen L. Kopecky, MD; Sherine E. Gabriel, MD, MSc

JAMA. 2000;283:646-652.

Context  The existence of sex bias in the delivery of cardiac care is controversial, and little is known about the association between sex and delivery of care and outcomes at an early point in the diagnostic sequence, such as when patients present for the evaluation of chest pain.

Objective  To test the hypothesis that female sex is negatively associated with care delivered to and outcomes of persons diagnosed as having unstable angina.

Design  Inception population-based cohort study with an average of 6 years of follow-up.

Setting  Emergency departments (EDs) in Olmsted County, Minnesota.

Patients  A total of 2271 Olmsted County residents (1306 men and 965 women) who presented to the ED for the first time with symptoms meeting criteria for unstable angina between 1985 and 1992.

Main Outcome Measures  Use of cardiac procedures within 90 days of ED visit, overall mortality, and cardiac events (cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal cardiac arrest, and congestive heart failure), compared by sex and Agency for Health Care Policy and Research cardiovascular risk category (low, intermediate, or high).

Results  Women were older (P<.001), more likely to have a history of hypertension (P = .001), and less likely to present with typical angina (P = .004) than men. Men were more likely than women to undergo noninvasive cardiac tests (relative risk [RR], 1.27; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.14-1.40) as well as invasive cardiac procedures (RR, 1.72; 95% CI, 1.51-1.97). After adjustment, male sex was associated with a 24% increase in the use of cardiac procedures. Survival of both men and women in the high and intermediate risk categories was significantly lower than expected per the general population (P<.001). Women had a worse outcome than men, but after multivariate adjustment, male sex was associated with a trend toward an increase in the risk of death (RR, 1.23; 95% CI, 0.99-1.54) and significantly associated with increased risk of cardiac events (RR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.03-1.42).

Conclusions  Our population-based data indicate that after an ED visit for symptoms of unstable angina, the use of cardiac procedures was lower in women, but after taking into account baseline characteristics, men experienced worse outcomes.


Author Affiliations: Division of Cardiovascular Diseases and Internal Medicine (Drs Roger, Reeder, and Kopecky) and Sections of Biostatistics (Ms Weston and Dr Zinsmeister) and Epidemiology (Drs Jacobsen and Gabriel), Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation, and Department of Research, Olmsted Medical Center (Dr Yawn), Rochester, Minn; and Division of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Institute, Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, NY (Dr Farkouh).


RELATED ARTICLES

Sex Bias in Cardiovascular Care: Should Women Be Treated More Like Men?
Daniel B. Mark
JAMA. 2000;283(5):659-661.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

February 2, 2000
JAMA. 2000;283(5):681-682.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Symptom Presentation of Women With Acute Coronary Syndromes: Myth vs Reality
Canto et al.
Arch Intern Med 2007;167:2405-2413.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Differences in admission rates and outcomes between men and women presenting to emergency departments with coronary syndromes
Kaul et al.
CMAJ 2007;177:1193-1199.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Gender differences in management and outcome in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome
Alfredsson et al.
Heart 2007;93:1357-1362.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Coronary Revascularization in the Community: A Population-Based Study, 1990 to 2004
Gerber et al.
J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;50:1223-1229.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Perspective: Gender as a Health Determinant and Implications for Health Education
Davidson et al.
Health Educ Behav 2006;33:731-743.
ABSTRACT  

The Impact of Unstable Angina Guidelines in the Triage of Emergency Department Patients with Possible Acute Coronary Syndrome.
Katz et al.
Med Decis Making 2006;26:606-616.
ABSTRACT  

Temporal Trends in the Utilization of Diagnostic Testing and Treatments for Cardiovascular Disease in the United States, 1993-2001
Lucas et al.
Circulation 2006;113:374-379.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Do men benefit more than women from an interventional strategy in patients with unstable angina or non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction? The impact of gender in the RITA 3 trial
Clayton et al.
Eur Heart J 2004;25:1641-1650.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Cardiac rehabilitation after myocardial infarction in the community
Witt et al.
J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;44:988-996.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Effect of gender on bridging to transplantation and posttransplantation survival in patients with left ventricular assist devices
Morgan et al.
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2004;127:1193-1195.
FULL TEXT  

Sex Differences in Outcomes After Cardiac Catheterization: Effect Modification by Treatment Strategy and Time
King et al.
JAMA 2004;291:1220-1225.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Gender Differences in Health Information Needs and Decisional Preferences in Patients Recovering From an Acute Ischemic Coronary Event
Stewart et al.
Psychosom. Med. 2004;66:42-48.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Venous Thromboembolic Disease: Comparison of the Diagnostic Process in Men and Women
Stein et al.
Arch Intern Med 2003;163:1689-1694.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Modeling Smoking History: A Comparison of Different Approaches
Leffondre et al.
Am J Epidemiol 2002;156:813-823.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Gender differences in clinical status at time of coronary revascularisation in Spain
Aguilar et al.
J. Epidemiol. Community Health 2002;56:555-559.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Sex Differences in Access to Coronary Revascularization after Cardiac Catheterization: Importance of Detailed Clinical Data
Ghali et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2002;136:723-732.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Sudden Cardiac Death in the United States, 1989 to 1998
Zheng et al.
Circulation 2001;104:2158-2163.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Use of risk stratification to identify patients with unstable angina likeliest to benefit from an invasive versus conservative management strategy
Solomon et al.
J Am Coll Cardiol 2001;38:969-976.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Gender differences and temporal trends in clinical characteristics, stress test results and use of invasive procedures in patients undergoing evaluation for coronary artery disease
Miller et al.
J Am Coll Cardiol 2001;38:690-697.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Clinical risk stratification correlates with the angiographic extent of coronary artery disease in unstable angina
Mathew et al.
J Am Coll Cardiol 2001;37:2053-2058.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Risk stratification in unstable angina: the role of clinical prediction models
Katz
J Am Coll Cardiol 2000;36:1809-1811.
FULL TEXT  

Differences in Prognostic Factors and Outcomes Between Women and Men Undergoing Coronary Artery Stenting
Mehilli et al.
JAMA 2000;284:1799-1805.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

ADDITIONAL ARTICLES ABSTRACTED IN ACP JOURNAL CLUB
Evid. Based Med. 2000;5:131-131.
FULL TEXT  

Sex Differences in Treatment for Unstable Angina
Journal Watch Cardiology 2000;2000:8-8.
FULL TEXT  

Sex Bias in Cardiovascular Care: Should Women Be Treated More Like Men?
Mark
JAMA 2000;283:659-661.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2000 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.