You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 283 No. 7, February 16, 2000 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Health Law and Ethics
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (12)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in JAMA

ERISA Litigation and Physician Autonomy

Peter D. Jacobson, JD, MPH; Scott D. Pomfret, JD

JAMA. 2000;283:921-926.

The Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), enacted in 1974 to regulate pension and health benefit plans, is a complex statute that dominates the managed care environment. Physicians must understand ERISA's role in the relationship between themselves and managed care organizations (MCOs), including how it can influence clinical decision making and physician autonomy.

This article describes ERISA's central provisions and how ERISA influences health care delivery in MCOs. We analyze ERISA litigation trends in 4 areas: professional liability, utilization management, state legislative initiatives, and compensation arrangements. This analysis demonstrates how courts have interpreted ERISA to limit physician autonomy and subordinate clinical decision making to MCOs' cost containment decisions. Physicians should support efforts to amend ERISA, thus allowing greater state regulatory oversight of MCOs and permitting courts to hold MCOs accountable for their role in medical decision making.


Author Affiliations: School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor (Mr Jacobson) and Ropes and Gray, Boston, Mass (Mr Pomfret).


RELATED ARTICLE

February 16, 2000
JAMA. 2000;283(7):943-944.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Health Plan Liability and ERISA: The Expanding Scope of State Legislation
Hellinger and Young
Am. J. Public Health 2005;95:217-223.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Zen and the Art of Physician Autonomy Maintenance
Reinertsen
ANN INTERN MED 2003;138:992-995.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Regulating Health Care: From Self-Regulation to Self-Regulation?
Jacobson
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 2001;26:1165-1178.
 

The Role of the Courts in Shaping Health Policy: An Empirical Analysis
Jacobson et al.
J Law Med Ethics 2001;29:278-289.
 

Guidelines and Algorithms: Perceptions of Why and When They Are Successful and How to Improve Them
Keffer
Clin. Chem. 2001;47:1563-1572.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis in the Courts: Recent Trends and Future Prospects
Jacobson and Kanna
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 2001;26:291-326.
ABSTRACT  

Managed Care Litigation: Legal Doctrine at the Boundary of Tort and Contract
Jacobson and Patil
Med Care Res Rev 2000;57:440-463.
ABSTRACT  

The Supreme Court's View of the Managed Care Industry's Liability for Adverse Patient Outcomes
Jacobson
JAMA 2000;284:1516-1516.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2000 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.