You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 284 No. 11, September 20, 2000 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Original Contribution
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (56)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Prostate Disease
 •Oncology
 •Prostate Cancer
 •Randomized Controlled Trial
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Comparative Efficiency of Prostate-Specific Antigen Screening Strategies for Prostate Cancer Detection

Kevin S. Ross, MPH; H. Ballentine Carter, MD; Jay D. Pearson, PhD; Harry A. Guess, MD, PhD

JAMA. 2000;284:1399-1405.

Context  Despite widespread use of serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing to detect prostate cancer, the relative effectiveness of different PSA screening strategies is unknown.

Objective  To compare prostate cancer mortality, PSA testing rates, and biopsy rates using various PSA screening strategies, including the standard strategy of annually testing men aged 50 through 75 years.

Design and Setting  A Monte-Carlo simulation based on a Markov model was used to simulate the natural history of prostate cancer using different starting ages, testing intervals, and PSA thresholds for prostate biopsy. Age-specific PSA levels and prostate biopsy detection probabilities were determined from population data and surgical series.

Main Outcome Measures  Numbers of prevented prostate cancer deaths, PSA tests, and prostate biopsies per 1000 men aged 40 through 80 years, compared among 7 different strategies vs no screening.

Results  Compared with annual PSA testing beginning at age 50 years, the strategy of PSA testing at ages 40 and 45 years followed by biennial testing beginning at age 50 years was estimated to simultaneously reduce prostate cancer mortality and number of PSA tests and biopsies performed per 1000 men. Specifically, compared with no screening, the standard strategy prevents 3.2 deaths, with an additional 10,500 PSA tests and 600 prostate biopsies, while the earlier but less frequent strategy prevents 3.3 deaths, with an additional 7500 PSA tests and 450 prostate biopsies. Strategies that lowered the PSA threshold for prostate biopsy to below 4.0 ng/mL or strategies that used age-specific PSA levels were not more efficient than use of a PSA threshold of 4.0 ng/mL. These 2 findings remained true under all sensitivity analyses performed to test assumptions of the model.

Conclusion  Recognizing that the efficacy of PSA screening is unproved, the standard strategy of annual PSA screening beginning at age 50 years appears to be less effective and more resource intensive compared with a strategy that begins earlier but screens biennially instead of annually.


Author Affiliations: Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (Mr Ross and Dr Guess); Department of Urology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Md (Drs Carter and Pearson); and Department of Epidemiology, Merck Research Laboratories, Blue Bell, Pa (Drs Pearson and Guess).


RELATED ARTICLE

September 20, 2000
JAMA. 2000;284(11):1451-1452.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Trends in Prostate-Specific Antigen Testing From 1995 Through 2004
Farwell et al.
Arch Intern Med 2007;167:2497-2502.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Detection of prostate cancer in unselected young men: prospective cohort nested within a randomised controlled trial
Lane et al.
BMJ 2007;335:1139-1139.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Detection of life-threatening prostate cancer with prostate-specific antigen velocity during a window of curability.
Carter et al.
JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst 2006;98:1521-1527.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Viewpoint: limiting prostate cancer screening.
Hoffman
ANN INTERN MED 2006;144:438-440.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Biomarkers for Cancer Diagnosis: Implications for Nutritional Research
Maruvada and Srivastava
J. Nutr. 2004;134:1640S-1645S.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Second Round Results of the Finnish Population-Based Prostate Cancer Screening Trial
Makinen et al.
Clin. Cancer Res. 2004;10:2231-2236.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Screening for Prostate Cancer: An Update of the Evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force
Harris and Lohr
ANN INTERN MED 2002;137:917-929.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Overdiagnosis Due to Prostate-Specific Antigen Screening: Lessons From U.S. Prostate Cancer Incidence Trends
Etzioni et al.
JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst 2002;94:981-990.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Pathologic Features of Prostate Cancer Found at Population-Based Screening With a Four-Year Interval
Hoedemaeker et al.
JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst 2001;93:1153-1158.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Phases of Biomarker Development for Early Detection of Cancer
Pepe et al.
JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst 2001;93:1054-1061.
FULL TEXT  

Prostate-Specific-Antigen Testing for Early Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer
Barry
NEJM 2001;344:1373-1377.
FULL TEXT  

Earlier, Less Frequent PSA Sampling May Be Superior Strategy
JWatch Gastroenterology 2000;2000:14-14.
FULL TEXT  

Earlier, Less Frequent PSA Sampling May Be Superior Strategy
Journal Watch Dermatology 2000;2000:14-14.
FULL TEXT  

Earlier, Less Frequent PSA Sampling May Be Superior Strategy
JWatch General 2000;2000:3-3.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2000 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.