You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 284 No. 15, October 18, 2000 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Health Law and Ethics
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (18)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Law and Medicine
 •Alert me on articles by topic

A Proposed National Policy on Health Care Workers Living With HIV/AIDS and Other Blood-Borne Pathogens

Lawrence O. Gostin, JD, LLD

JAMA. 2000;284:1965-1970.

In 1991, scientific uncertainty about the risk of transmission of human immunodeficiency virus or hepatitis B virus (hepatitis B e antigen [HBeAg]–positive) led the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to recommend that infected health care workers (HCWs) be reviewed by an expert panel and inform patients of their serologic status before engaging in exposure-prone procedures. The data demonstrate that risks of transmission in the health care setting are exceedingly low, suggesting that the national policy should be reformed. Implementation of the current national policy at the local level poses significant human rights burdens on HCWs, but does not improve patient safety. A new national policy should focus on the management of the workplace environment and injury prevention by creating a program to prevent blood-borne pathogen transmission; by encouraging infected HCWs to promote their own health and well-being; by discontinuing expert review panels and special restrictions for exposure-prone procedures, which stigmatize HCWs; by discontinuing mandatory disclosure of a HCW's infection status in low-level risk procedures; and by imposing practice restrictions to avert significant risks to patients. Inclusion of these principles would achieve high levels of patient safety without discrimination and invasion of privacy.


Author Affiliation: Georgetown University Law Center, Washington, DC, and The Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Baltimore, Md.


RELATED ARTICLES

Patient Access to Information on Clinicians Infected With Blood-Borne Pathogens
Norman Fost
JAMA. 2000;284(15):1975-1976.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

October 18, 2000
JAMA. 2000;284(15):1993-1994.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

The unhealthy physician
Magnavita
J. Med. Ethics 2007;33:210-214.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Public Policy for Health Care Workers Infected With the Human Immunodeficiency Virus
Summers and Gostin
JAMA 2001;285:882-882.
FULL TEXT  

Patient Access to Information on Clinicians Infected With Blood-Borne Pathogens
Fost
JAMA 2000;284:1975-1976.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2000 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.