You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 284 No. 16, October 25, 2000 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Original Contribution
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (11)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Pediatrics
 •Neonatology and Infant Care
 •Randomized Controlled Trial
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Comprehensive Follow-up Care and Life-Threatening Illnesses Among High-Risk Infants

A Randomized Controlled Trial

R. Sue Broyles, MD; Jon E. Tyson, MD, MPH; Elizabeth T. Heyne, MS, PA-C; Roy J. Heyne, MD; Jackie F. Hickman, RN; Michael Swint, PhD; Sally S. Adams, MS, RN, CPNP; Linda A. West, RN, CPNP; Nancy Pomeroy, PhD; Patricia J. Hicks, MD; Chul Ahn, PhD

JAMA. 2000;284:2070-2076.

Context  Inner-city high-risk infants often receive limited and fragmented care, a problem that may increase serious illness.

Objective  To assess whether access to comprehensive care in a follow-up clinic is cost-effective in reducing life-threatening illnesses among high-risk, inner-city infants.

Design  Randomized controlled trial.

Setting and Participants  A total of 887 very-low-birth-weight infants born in a Texas county hospital between January 1988 and March 1996 and followed up in a children's hospital clinic. One hundred four infants who became ineligible or died after randomization but before nursery discharge were excluded from the analysis.

Interventions  Infants were randomly assigned to receive routine follow-up care (well-baby care and care for chronic illnesses; n = 441) or comprehensive care (which included the components of routine care plus care for acute illnesses, with 24-hour access to a primary caregiver; n = 446).

Main Outcome Measures  Life-threatening illnesses (ie, causing death or hospital admission for pediatric intensive care) occurring between nursery discharge and age 1 year, assessed by blinded evaluators from inpatient charts and state Medicaid and vital statistics records; and hospital costs (estimated from department-specific cost-to-charge ratios).

Results  Comprehensive care resulted in a mean of 3.1 more clinic visits and 6.7 more telephone conversations with clinic staff (P<.001 for both). One-year outcomes were unknown for fewer comprehensive-care infants than routine-care infants (9 vs 28; P = .001). Identified deaths were similar (11 in comprehensive care vs 13 in routine care; P = .68). The comprehensive-care group had 48% fewer life-threatening illnesses (33 vs 63; P<.001), 57% fewer intensive care admissions (23 vs 53; P = .003), and 42% fewer intensive care days (254 vs 440; P = .003). Comprehensive care did not increase the mean estimated cost per infant for all care ($6265 with comprehensive care and $9913 with routine care).

Conclusion  Comprehensive follow-up care by experienced caregivers can be highly effective in reducing life-threatening illness without increasing costs among high-risk inner-city infants.


Author Affiliations: Department of Pediatrics, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (Drs Broyles, Tyson, and Hicks and Ms Hickman); University of Texas-Houston School of Public Health (Drs Swint and Pomeroy); Children's Medical Center of Dallas (Mss Heyne, Adams, and West and Dr Heyne); and Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Houston Medical School (Dr Ahn). Dr Tyson is now director of the Center for Population Health and Evidence-Based Medicine, University of Texas-Houston.


RELATED ARTICLES

October 25, 2000
JAMA. 2000;284(16):2125-2126.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

High-Risk Infants
JAMA. 2000;284(16):2142.
PDF  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

A Review of the Evidence for the Medical Home for Children With Special Health Care Needs
Homer et al.
Pediatrics 2008;122:e922-e937.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Follow-up Care for Infants With Chronic Lung Disease: A Randomized Comparison of Community- and Center-Based Models
O'Shea et al.
Pediatrics 2007;119:e947-e957.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Outcomes for Extremely Low-Birth-Weight Infants: Disappointing News
Tyson and Saigal
JAMA 2005;294:371-373.
FULL TEXT  

Follow-up Care of High-Risk Infants
Pediatrics 2004;114:1377-1397.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Principles of Child Health Care Financing
Committee on Child Health Financing
Pediatrics 2003;112:997-999.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Role of Follow-up in Randomized Controlled Trials
Wright
NeoReviews 2001;2:e257-266.
FULL TEXT  

Physical Growth and Current Health Status of Infants Who Were of Extremely Low Birth Weight and Controls at Adolescence
Saigal et al.
Pediatrics 2001;108:407-415.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Comprehensive follow up care reduced life threatening illnesses without increasing costs in high risk, inner city infants
Harrigan
Evid. Based Nurs. 2001;4:78-78.
FULL TEXT  

Primary Care for Premature Infants
JWatch General 2000;2000:3-3.
FULL TEXT  

Insuring the Uninsured: Time to End the Aura of Invisibility
Grumbach
JAMA 2000;284:2114-2116.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2000 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.