You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 284 No. 19, November 15, 2000 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Original Contribution
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (44)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Patient-Physician Relationship/ Care
 •End-of-life Care/ Palliative Medicine
 •Pediatrics
 •Neonatology and Infant Care
 •Quality of Life
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Neonatal End-of-Life Decision Making

Physicians' Attitudes and Relationship With Self-reported Practices in 10 European Countries

Marisa Rebagliato, MD; Marina Cuttini, MD; Lara Broggin, MSc; István Berbik, MD; Umberto de Vonderweid, MD; Gesine Hansen, MD; Monique Kaminski, MSc; Louis A. A. Kollée, MD; Audrunas Kucinskas, MD; Sylvie Lenoir, MD; Adik Levin, MD; Jan Persson, PhD; Margaret Reid, PhD; Rodolfo Saracci, MD; for the EURONIC Study Group

JAMA. 2000;284:2451-2459.

Context  The ethical issues surrounding end-of-life decision making for infants with adverse prognoses are controversial. Little empirical evidence is available on the attitudes and values that underlie such decisions in different countries and cultures.

Objective  To explore the variability of neonatal physicians' attitudes among 10 European countries and the relationship between such attitudes and self-reported practice of end-of-life decisions.

Design and Setting  Survey conducted during 1996-1997 in 10 European countries (France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Spain, Sweden, the United Kingdom, Estonia, Hungary, and Lithuania).

Participants  A total of 1391 physicians (response rate, 89%) regularly employed in 142 neonatal intensive care units (NICUs).

Main Outcome Measures  Scores on an attitude scale, which measured views regarding absolute value of life (score of 0) vs value of quality of life (score of 10); self-report of having ever set limits to intensive neonatal interventions in cases of poor neurological prognosis.

Results  Physicians more likely to agree with statements consistent with preserving life at any cost were from Hungary (mean attitude scores, 5.2 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 4.9-5.5]), Estonia (4.9 [95% CI, 4.3-5.5]), Lithuania (5.5 [95% CI, 4.8-6.1]), and Italy (5.7 [95% CI, 5.3-6.0]), while physicians more likely to agree with the idea that quality of life must be taken into account were from the United Kingdom (attitude scores, 7.4 [95% CI, 7.1-7.7]), the Netherlands (7.3 [95% CI, 7.1-7.5]), and Sweden (6.8 [95% CI, 6.4-7.3]). Other factors associated with having a pro–quality-of-life view were being female, having had no children, being Protestant or having no religious background, considering religion as not important, and working in an NICU with a high number of very low-birth-weight newborns. Physicians with scores reflecting a more quality-of-life view were more likely to report that in their practice, they had set limits to intensive interventions in cases of poor neurological prognosis, with an adjusted odds ratio of 1.5 (95% CI, 1.3-1.7) per unit change in attitude score.

Conclusions  In our study, physicians' likelihood of reporting setting limits to intensive neonatal interventions in cases of poor neurological prognosis is related to their attitudes. After adjusting for potential confounders, country remained the most important predictor of physicians' attitudes and practices.


Author Affiliations: Department of Public Health, Miguel Hernandez University, Alicante, Spain (Dr Rebagliato); Units of Epidemiology and Neonatal Intensive Care, Burlo Garofolo Children's Hospital (Drs Cuttini, de Vonderweid, and Broggin), Trieste, and Division of Epidemiology, IFC, National Research Council (Dr Saracci), Pisa, Italy; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Vaszary Kolos Hospital, Tergoti, Hungary (Dr Berbik); Department of Pediatrics, Martin-Luther University, Halle, Germany (Dr Hansen); Epidemiological Research Unit on Perinatal and Women's Health U.149 INSERM (Dr Kaminski) Villejuif, and Unit of Research on Reproduction, INSERM CJF 89-08 (Dr Lenoir), Toulouse, France; Department of Neonatology, University Hospital of Nijmegen, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (Dr Kollée); Neonatal Clinic, Vilnius University, Lithuania (Dr Kucinskas); Newborn and Premature Children's Department, Tallinn Hospital, Estonia (Dr Levin); Center for Medical Technology Assessment, Linköping University, Sweden (Dr Persson); and Department of Public Health, University of Glasgow, Scotland (Dr Reid).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

November 15, 2000
JAMA. 2000;284(19):2531-2532.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

The acceptability among French lay persons of ending the lives of damaged newborns
Teisseyre et al.
J. Med. Ethics 2009;35:701-708.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

End-of-Life Decisions in Dutch Neonatal Intensive Care Units
Verhagen et al.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2009;163:895-901.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Neonatologist Training to Guide Family Decision Making for Critically Ill Infants
Boss et al.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2009;163:783-788.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A comparison of foetal and infant mortality in the United States and Canada
Ananth et al.
Int J Epidemiol 2009;38:480-489.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Resuscitation of Likely Nonviable Newborns: Would Neonatology Practices in California Change if the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act Were Enforced?
Partridge et al.
Pediatrics 2009;123:1088-1094.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Construction of a Parent-Derived Questionnaire to Measure End-of-Life Care After Withdrawal of Life-Sustaining Treatment in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit
Williams et al.
Pediatrics 2009;123:e87-e95.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Impact of Intensive Care Practices on Short-Term and Long-term Outcomes for Extremely Preterm Infants: Comparison Between the British Isles and France
Bodeau-Livinec et al.
Pediatrics 2008;122:e1014-e1021.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Values Parents Apply to Decision-Making Regarding Delivery Room Resuscitation for High-Risk Newborns
Boss et al.
Pediatrics 2008;122:583-589.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Doctors' and nurses' attitudes towards neonatal ethical decision making in Ireland
Samaan et al.
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2008;93:F217-F221.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Just, in Time: Ethical Implications of Serial Predictions of Death and Morbidity for Ventilated Premature Infants
Meadow et al.
Pediatrics 2008;121:732-740.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A role for doctors in assisted dying? An analysis of legal regulations and medical professional positions in six European countries
Bosshard et al.
J. Med. Ethics 2008;34:28-32.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Physician Medical Decision-making at the End of Life in Newborns: Insight Into Implementation at 2 Dutch Centers
Verhagen et al.
Pediatrics 2007;120:e20-e28.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Delivery room decision-making for extremely preterm infants in Sweden.
Peerzada et al.
Pediatrics 2006;117:1988-1995.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

End-of-Life Decision Making in Europe and Australia: A Physician Survey.
Onwuteaka-Philipsen et al.
Arch Intern Med 2006;166:921-929.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The impact of regional culture on intensive care end of life decision making: an Israeli perspective from the ETHICUS study.
Ganz et al.
J. Med. Ethics 2006;32:196-199.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Groningen protocol: another perspective.
Jotkowitz and Glick
J. Med. Ethics 2006;32:157-158.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Medical End-of-Life Decisions for Children in the Netherlands
Vrakking et al.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2005;159:802-809.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Emerging Issue of Euthanasia
Siden
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2005;159:887-889.
FULL TEXT  

International Comparison of Care for Very Low Birth Weight Infants: Parents' Perceptions of Counseling and Decision-Making
Partridge et al.
Pediatrics 2005;116:e263-e271.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Forgoing Treatment at the End of Life in 6 European Countries
Bosshard et al.
Arch Intern Med 2005;165:401-407.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

End-of-Life After Birth: Death and Dying in a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit
Singh et al.
Pediatrics 2004;114:1620-1626.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Withholding and withdrawing life prolonging treatment in the intensive care unit: a current European perspective
Vincent et al.
Chronic Respiratory Disease 2004;1:115-120.
ABSTRACT  

Guidelines for Resuscitation in the Delivery Room of Extremely Preterm Infants
Verlato et al.
J Child Neurol 2004;19:31-34.
ABSTRACT  

Should euthanasia be legal? An international survey of neonatal intensive care units staff
Cuttini et al.
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2004;89:F19-F24.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Pediatric End-of-Life Decisions
JWatch General 2000;2000:7-7.
FULL TEXT  

Learning to Care for People With Chronic Illness Facing the End of Life
Lynn
JAMA 2000;284:2508-2511.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2000 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.