 |
|
Seven Legal Barriers to End-of-Life Care
Myths, Realities, and Grains of Truth
Alan Meisel, JD;
Lois Snyder, JD;
Timothy Quill, MD;
for the American College of Physicians-American Society of Internal Medicine End-of-Life Care Consensus Panel
JAMA. 2000;284:2495-2501.
Objective The American College of Physicians-American Society of Internal Medicine (ACP-ASIM) End-of-Life Care Consensus Panel was convened in 1997 to identify clinical, ethical, and policy problems in end-of-life care, to analyze critically the available evidence and guidelines, and to offer consensus recommendations on how to improve care of the dying. Topic selection and content presentation were carefully debated to maximize the project's focus on providing practical clinical and other guidance to clinicians who are not specialists in palliative care. This statement examines current legal myths, realities, and grains of truth in end-of-life care.
Participants The Consensus Panel comprises 13 medical and bioethics experts, clinicians, and educators in care at the end of life selected by the Ethics and Human Rights Committee, College leadership, and the Center for Ethics and Professionalism at the ACP-ASIM.
Evidence A literature review including a MEDLINE search of articles from 1970-1998 and review of end-of-life care literature and organizational bibliographies was conducted. Unpublished sources were also identified by participants, as was anecdotal clinical experience.
Consensus Process The draft statement was debated by panel members over a series of 3 to 4 meetings. For this statement, the initial draft and subsequent revised drafts were discussed in 1998-1999. The statement then underwent external peer review and revision before panel approval and the journal peer review process.
Conclusions Legal myths about end-of-life care can undermine good care and ethical medical practice. In addition, at times ethics, clinical judgment, and the law conflict. Patients (or families) and physicians can find themselves considering clinical actions that are ethically appropriate, but raise legal concerns. The 7 major legal myths regarding end-of-life care are: (1) forgoing life-sustaining treatment for patients without decision-making capacity requires evidence that this was the patient's actual wish; (2) withholding or withdrawing of artificial fluids and nutrition from terminally ill or permanently unconscious patients is illegal; (3) risk management personnel must be consulted before life-sustaining medical treatment may be terminated; (4) advance directives must comply with specific forms, are not transferable between states, and govern all future treatment decisions; oral advance directives are unenforceable; (5) if a physician prescribes or administers high doses of medication to relieve pain or other discomfort in a terminally ill patient, resulting in death, he/she will be criminally prosecuted; (6) when a terminally ill patient's suffering is overwhelming despite palliative care, and he/she requests a hastened death, there are no legally permissible options to ease suffering; and (7) the 1997 Supreme Court decisions outlawed physician-assisted suicide. Many legal barriers to end-of-life care are more mythical than real, but sometimes there is a grain of truth. Physicians must know the law of the state in which they practice.
Author Affiliations: Center for Medical Ethics, University of Pittsburgh School of Law, Pittsburgh, Pa (Mr Meisel); Center for Ethics and Professionalism, American College of Physicians-American Society of Internal Medicine, Philadelphia, Pa (Ms Snyder); and Department of Medicine, Genesee Hospital, Rochester, NY (Dr Quill).
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
|
HRS/EHRA Expert Consensus on the Monitoring of Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Devices (CIEDs): Description of Techniques, Indications, Personnel, Frequency and Ethical Considerations: Developed in partnership with the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) and the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA); and in collaboration with the American College of Cardiology (ACC), the American Heart Association (AHA), the European Society of Cardiology (ESC), the Heart Failure Association of ESC (HFA), and the Heart Failure Society of America (HFSA). Endorsed by the Heart Rhythm Society, the European Heart Rhythm Association (a registered branch of the ESC), the American College of Cardiology, the American Heart Association
Wilkoff et al.
Europace 2008;10:707-725.
FULL TEXT
Intensive Care Management of the Patient With Cystic Fibrosis
Kremer et al.
J Intensive Care Med 2008;23:159-177.
ABSTRACT
Families and the Decision to Withhold or Withdraw Life-sustaining Therapy from the Critically Ill: Are Pressure Tactics Ever Justified?
Dandapantula et al.
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2008;177:124-124.
FULL TEXT
Nephrologists' Changing Practices in Reported End-of-Life Decision-Making
Holley et al.
CJASN 2007;2:107-111.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Palliative and End-of-Life Care for Patients With Cardiopulmonary Diseases: American College of Chest Physicians Position Statement
Selecky et al.
Chest 2005;128:3599-3610.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
To Feed or Not to Feed: Is That the Right Question?
Moynihan et al.
JCO 2005;23:6256-6259.
FULL TEXT
Prognosis and Decision Making in Severe Stroke
G. Holloway et al.
JAMA 2005;294:725-733.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Internists' attitudes towards terminal sedation in end of life care
Kaldjian et al.
J. Med. Ethics 2004;30:499-503.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Meaning and Agency in Discussing End-of-Life Care: A Study of Elderly Veterans' Values and Interpretations
Young et al.
Qual Health Res 2003;13:1039-1062.
ABSTRACT
Advance Care Planning for Fatal Chronic Illness: Avoiding Commonplace Errors and Unwarranted Suffering
Lynn and Goldstein
ANN INTERN MED 2003;138:812-818.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Just Whose Autonomy Is It?
Davis et al.
JCO 2003;21:67s-69.
FULL TEXT
Pain Relief, Prescription Drugs, and Prosecution: A Four-State Survey of Chief Prosecutors
Ziegler and Lovrich
J Law Med Ethics 2003;31:75-100.
End-of-Life Care for a Man with Developmental Disabilities
Lohiya et al.
J Am Board Fam Med 2003;16:58-62.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Legal and Ethical Considerations for Mental Health Professionals Related to End-of-life Care and Decision Making
WERTH
American Behavioral Scientist 2002;46:373-388.
ABSTRACT
Evaluating End-of-Life Care from the Perspective of the Patient's Family
Larson and Larson
Eval Health Prof 2002;25:143-151.
ABSTRACT
The agony of agonal respiration: is the last gasp necessary?
Perkin and Resnik
J. Med. Ethics 2002;28:164-169.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Just Whose Autonomy Is It?
Davis et al.
JCO 2001;19:3787-3789.
FULL TEXT
Special Issue of JAMA Focuses on End of Life
Journal Watch Dermatology 2001;2001:12-12.
FULL TEXT
Special Issue of JAMA Focuses on End of Life
JWatch General 2000;2000:5-5.
FULL TEXT
Learning to Care for People With Chronic Illness Facing the End of Life
Lynn
JAMA 2000;284:2508-2511.
FULL TEXT
|
