 |
|
A Prospective Study of Back Belts for Prevention of Back Pain and Injury
James T. Wassell, PhD;
Lytt I. Gardner, PhD;
Douglas P. Landsittel, PhD;
Janet J. Johnston, PhD;
Janet M. Johnston, PhD
JAMA. 2000;284:2727-2732.
Context Despite scientific uncertainties about effectiveness, wearing back belts in the hopes of preventing costly and disabling low back injury in employees is becoming common in the workplace.
Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of using back belts in reducing back injury claims and low back pain.
Design and Setting Prospective cohort study. From April 1996 through April 1998, we identified material-handling employees in 160 new retail merchandise stores (89 required back belt use; 71 had voluntary back belt use) in 30 states (from New Hampshire to Michigan in the north and from Florida to Texas in the south); data collection ended December 1998, median follow-up was 6 months.
Participants A referred sample of 13,873 material handling employees provided 9377 baseline interviews and 6311 (67%) follow-up interviews; 206 (1.4%) refused baseline interview.
Main Outcome Measures Incidence rate of material-handling back injury workers' compensation claims and 6-month incidence rate of self-reported low back pain.
Results Neither frequent back belt use nor a belt-requirement store policy was significantly associated with back injury claim rates or self-reported back pain. Rate ratios comparing back injury claims of those who reported wearing back belts usually every day and once or twice a week vs those who reported wearing belts never or once or twice a month were 1.22 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.87-1.70) and 0.95 (95% CI, 0.56-1.59), respectively. The respective odds ratios for low back pain incidence were 0.97 (95% CI, 0.83-1.13) and 0.92 (95% CI, 0.73-1.16).
Conclusions In the largest prospective cohort study of back belt use, adjusted for multiple individual risk factors, neither frequent back belt use nor a store policy that required belt use was associated with reduced incidence of back injury claims or low back pain.
Author Affiliations: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Division of Safety Research, Morgantown, WVa. Dr Gardner is now with National Center for HIV, STD and TB Prevention. Dr Landsittel is now with the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Health Effects Laboratory Division. Dr Janet M. Johnston is now with the University of Pittsburgh, Graduate School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, Pa.
RELATED ARTICLES
Back Belts in the Workplace
Nortin M. Hadler and Timothy S. Carey
JAMA. 2000;284(21):2780-2781.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
December 6, 2000
JAMA. 2000;284(21):2803.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Coping With Back Pain
JAMA. 2000;284(21):2826.
PDF
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
Use of back belts to prevent occupational low-back pain
CMAJ 2003;169:213-214.
FULL TEXT
Statistical and design issues in studies of groups
Cummings and Koepsell
Inj. Prev. 2002;8:6-7.
FULL TEXT
Public health approaches to occupational injury prevention: do they work?
Smith
Inj. Prev. 2001;7:i3-10.
FULL TEXT
Do Back Belts Prevent Back Injury?
Dorinson et al.
JAMA 2001;285:1151-1152.
FULL TEXT
Back Belts Don't Prevent Back Injury
JWatch Emergency Med. 2001;2001:8-8.
FULL TEXT
Back Belts Ineffective for Prevention of Back Pain
JWatch General 2001;2001:7-7.
FULL TEXT
Back Belts in the Workplace
Hadler and Carey
JAMA 2000;284:2780-2781.
FULL TEXT
|
