You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 284 No. 21, December 6, 2000 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Original Contribution
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (51)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Cardiovascular Disease/ Myocardial Infarction
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Health and Economic Benefits of Increased {beta}-Blocker Use Following Myocardial Infarction

Kathryn A. Phillips, PhD; Michael G. Shlipak, MD, MPH; Pam Coxson, PhD; Paul A. Heidenreich, MD, MS; M. G. Myriam Hunink, PhD; Paula A. Goldman, MPH; Lawrence W. Williams, MS; Milton C. Weinstein, PhD; Lee Goldman, MD, MPH

JAMA. 2000;284:2748-2754.

Context  {beta}-Blockers are underused in patients who have myocardial infarction (MI), despite the proven efficacy of these agents. New evidence indicates that {beta}-blockers can have benefit in patients with conditions that have been considered relative contraindications. Understanding the consequences of underuse of {beta}-blockers is important because of the implications for current policy debates over quality-of-care measures and Medicare prescription drug coverage.

Objective  To examine the potential health and economic impact of increased use of {beta}-blockers in patients who have had MI.

Design and Setting  We used the Coronary Heart Disease (CHD) Policy Model, a computer-simulation Markov model of CHD in the US population, to estimate the epidemiological impact and cost-effectiveness of increased {beta}-blocker use from current to target levels among survivors of MI aged 35 to 84 years. Simulations included 1 cohort of MI survivors in 2000 followed up for 20 years and 20 successive annual cohorts of all first-MI survivors in 2000-2020. Mortality and morbidity from CHD were derived from published meta-analyses and recent studies. This analysis used a societal perspective.

Main Outcome Measures  Prevented MIs, CHD mortality, life-years gained, and cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained in 2000-2020.

Results  Initiating {beta}-blocker use for all MI survivors except those with absolute contraindications in 2000 and continuing treatment for 20 years would result in 4300 fewer CHD deaths, 3500 MIs prevented, and 45,000 life-years gained compared with current use. The incremental cost per QALY gained would be $4500. If this increase in {beta}-blocker use were implemented in all first-MI survivors annually over 20 years, {beta}-blockers would save $18 million and result in 72,000 fewer CHD deaths, 62,000 MIs prevented, and 447,000 life-years gained. Sensitivity analyses demonstrated that the cost-effectiveness of {beta}-blocker therapy would always be less than $11,000 per QALY gained, even under unfavorable assumptions, and may even be cost saving. Restricting {beta}-blockers only to ideal patients (those without absolute or relative contraindications) would reduce the epidemiological impact of {beta}-blocker therapy by about 60%.

Conclusions  Our simulation indicates that increased use of {beta}-blockers after MI would lead to impressive gains in health and would be potentially cost saving.


Author Affiliations: Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Institute for Health Policy Studies, and Center of Excellence on Health Care Markets and Managed Care (Dr Phillips) and Department of Medicine (Drs Shlipak, Coxson, and L. Goldman), University of California, San Francisco; San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center (Dr Shlipak); Palo Alto VA Health Care System and Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, Calif (Dr Heidenreich); Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Mass (Drs Hunink and Weinstein, Ms P. Goldman and Mr Williams); and Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands (Dr Hunink).


RELATED ARTICLE

December 6, 2000
JAMA. 2000;284(21):2803.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

A Randomized Trial of Direct-to-Patient Communication to Enhance Adherence to {beta}-Blocker Therapy Following Myocardial Infarction
Smith et al.
Arch Intern Med 2008;168:477-483.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Long-Term Adherence to Evidence-Based Secondary Prevention Therapies in Coronary Artery Disease
Newby et al.
Circulation 2006;113:203-212.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Medicare and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
Neumann et al.
NEJM 2005;353:1516-1522.
FULL TEXT  

Cost-Effectiveness of Full Medicare Coverage of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors for Beneficiaries with Diabetes
Rosen et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2005;143:89-99.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Pursuing integration of performance measures into electronic medical records: beta-adrenergic receptor antagonist medications
Weiner et al.
Qual Saf Health Care 2005;14:99-106.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Prognostic Value of Pharmacological Stress Echocardiography Is Affected by Concomitant Antiischemic Therapy at the Time of Testing
Sicari et al.
Circulation 2004;109:2428-2431.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Business Case for Quality: Combining Medical Literature Research with Health Plan Data to Establish Value for Nonclinical Managers
Fetterolf and West
American Journal of Medical Quality 2004;19:48-55.
ABSTRACT  

Patient Safety Is Not Enough: Targeting Quality Improvements To Optimize the Health of the Population
Woolf
ANN INTERN MED 2004;140:33-36.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Risk Factors and Secondary Prevention in Women with Heart Disease
Shlipak et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2003;139:954-955.
FULL TEXT  

Beta-blockers and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/receptor blockers prescriptions after hospital discharge for heart failure are associated with decreased mortality in Alberta, Canada
Johnson et al.
J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;42:1438-1445.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Use of Continuous Quality Improvement to Increase Use of Process Measures in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Ferguson et al.
JAMA 2003;290:49-56.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Outpatient adherence to beta-blocker therapy after acute myocardial infarction
Butler et al.
J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;40:1589-1595.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Task Force #1--magnitude of the prevention problem: opportunities and challenges
Benjamin et al.
J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;40:588-603.
FULL TEXT  

Cost Effectiveness of Aspirin, Clopidogrel, or Both for Secondary Prevention of Coronary Heart Disease
Gaspoz et al.
NEJM 2002;346:1800-1806.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Supplemental Insurance and Use of Effective Cardiovascular Drugs Among Elderly Medicare Beneficiaries With Coronary Heart Disease
Federman et al.
JAMA 2001;286:1732-1739.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Presidential address: quality of cardiovascular care in the U.S.
Beller
J Am Coll Cardiol 2001;38:587-594.
FULL TEXT  

Increased Beta-Blocker Use After MI -- Estimated Health and Cost Benefits
Journal Watch Cardiology 2001;2001:6-6.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2000 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.