You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 284 No. 3, July 19, 2000 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Original Contribution
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (57)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Women's Health
 •Pregnancy and Breast Feeding
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Trends in Twin Birth Outcomes and Prenatal Care Utilization in the United States, 1981-1997

Michael D. Kogan, PhD; Greg R. Alexander, MPH, ScD; Milton Kotelchuck, PhD, MPH; Marian F. MacDorman, PhD; Pierre Buekens, MD; Joyce A. Martin, MPH; Emile Papiernik, MD

JAMA. 2000;284:335-341.

Context  Multiple births account for an increasing percentage of all low-birth-weight infants, preterm births, and infant mortality in the United States. Since 1981, the percentage of women with multiple births who received intensive prenatal care (defined as a high number of visits, exceeding the recommendation of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists by approximately 1 SD beyond the mean number of visits for women initiating care within each trimester) has increased significantly.

Objectives  To explore the hypothesis that more aggressive management of twin-birth pregnancies may be associated with changes in birth outcomes in this population.

Design, Setting, and Subjects  Cross-sectional and trend analysis of data from the National Center for Health Statistics' birth and infant death records for all twin births occurring in the United States between 1981 and 1997, excluding those with missing or inconsistent data.

Main Outcome Measures  Trends in preterm birth, low birth weight, preterm and term small-for-gestational-age (SGA) births, and infant mortality, by level of prenatal care utilization.

Results  The preterm birth rate for twins increased from 40.9% in 1981 to 55.0% in 1997. The percentage of low-birth-weight infants increased from 51.0% to 54.0%. The preterm SGA rate also increased from 11.9% to 14.1%, while the term SGA rate decreased from 30.7% to 20.5%. For women with intensive prenatal care utilization, the preterm birth rate increased from 35.1% to 55.8%, compared with an increase from 50.6% to 59.2% among women with only adequate use. Twin preterm deliveries involving either induction or first cesarean delivery also increased from 21.9% to 27.3% between 1989-1991 and 1995-1997. The twin infant mortality rate for women with intensive prenatal care use declined between 1983 and 1996 and remained lower than the overall twin infant mortality rate.

Conclusions  An apparent increase in medical interventions in the management of twins may result in the seeming incongruity of more prenatal care and more preterm births; however, these data suggest that women with intensive prenatal care utilization also have a lower infant mortality rate.


Author Affiliations: Maternal and Child Health Bureau, Health Resources and Services Administration, Rockville, Md (Dr Kogan); Department of Maternal and Child Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham (Drs Alexander and Papiernik); Department of Maternal and Child Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (Drs Kotelchuck and Buekens); Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville, Md (Dr MacDorman and Ms Martin); and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Rene Descartes, Paris, France (Dr Papiernik).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

July 19, 2000
JAMA. ;284():375-376.
FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Perinatal outcome of twin pregnancies in women of advanced age
Delbaere et al.
Hum Reprod 2008;23:2145-2150.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Socioeconomic status and perinatal outcomes in a setting with universal access to essential health care services
Joseph et al.
CMAJ 2007;177:583-590.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Does Sonographic Determination of Placental Location Predict Fetal Birth Weight in Diamniotic-Dichorionic Twins?
Belogolovkin et al.
J Ultrasound Med 2007;26:187-191.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Preterm delivery in primiparous women at low risk: Preterm birth or delivery? Study authors suggest new terms.
Vogel et al.
BMJ 2006;332:1094-1094.
FULL TEXT  

Population based study on the outcome of small for gestational age newborns
Bartels et al.
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2005;90:F53-F59.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Trends in Prenatal Care Use and Low Birthweight in Southeast Brazil
Goldani et al.
AJPH 2004;94:1366-1371.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Reduction of Preeclampsia in Multiple Pregnancies by a Dedicated Monitoring Protocol
Hirtenlehner et al.
Reproductive Sciences 2003;10:418-422.
ABSTRACT  

Embryo reduction and birth weight discordance in dichorionic twins
Audibert et al.
Hum Reprod 2003;18:437-440.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Changes in Stillbirth and Infant Mortality Associated With Increases in Preterm Birth Among Twins
Joseph et al.
Pediatrics 2001;108:1055-1061.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2000 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.