This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on Web of Science (70)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Related article  • Similar articles in JAMA  Topic Collections  • Otolaryngology/ Head & Neck Surgery  • Cochlear Implantation  • Hearing Loss/ Deafness  • Alert me on articles by topic  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

André K. Cheng, MD, PhD; Haya R. Rubin, MD, PhD; Neil R. Powe, MD, MPH, MBA; Nancy K. Mellon, MS; Howard W. Francis, MD; John K. Niparko, MD

JAMA. 2000;284:850-856.

Context  Barriers to the use of cochlear implants in children with profound deafness include device costs, difficulty assessing benefit, and lack of data to compare the implant with other medical interventions.

Objective  To determine the quality of life and cost consequences for deaf children who receive a cochlear implant.

Design  Cost-utility analysis using preintervention, postintervention, and cross-sectional surveys conducted from July 1998 to May 2000.

Setting  Hearing clinic at a US academic medical center.

Participants  Parents of 78 profoundly deaf children (average age, 7.5 years) who received cochlear implants.

Main Outcome Measures  Direct and total cost to society per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) using the time-trade-off (TTO), visual analog scale (VAS), and Health Utilities Index—Mark III (HUI), discounting costs and benefits 3% annually. Parents rated their child's health state at the time of the survey and immediately before and 1 year before implantation.

Results  Recipients had an average of 1.9 years of implant use. Mean VAS scores increased by 0.27, from 0.59 before implantation to 0.86 at survey. In a subset of participants, TTO scores increased by 0.22, from 0.75 to 0.97 (n = 40) and HUI scores increased by 0.39, from 0.25 to 0.64 (n = 22). Quality-of-life scores were no different 1 year before and immediately before implantation. Discounted direct costs were $60,228, yielding $9029 per QALY using the TTO, $7500 per QALY using the VAS, and $5197 per QALY using the HUI. Including indirect costs such as reduced educational expenses, the cochlear implant provided a savings of $53,198 per child.

Conclusions  Cochlear implants in profoundly deaf children have a positive effect on quality of life at reasonable direct costs and appear to result in a net savings to society.

Author Affiliations: Departments of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (Drs Cheng, Francis, and Niparko and Ms Mellon), Medicine (Drs Rubin and Powe), Health Policy and Management (Drs Rubin and Powe), and Epidemiology (Dr Powe), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Md.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

August 16, 2000
JAMA. 2000;284(7):899-900.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Tube feeding and quality of life in children with severe neurological impairment
Mahant et al.
Arch. Dis. Child. 2009;94:668-673.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Estimating Preference-Based Health Utilities Index Mark 3 Utility Scores for Childhood Conditions in England and Scotland
Petrou and Kupek
Med Decis Making 2009;29:291-303.
ABSTRACT  

Quality of Life for Children With Cochlear Implants: Perceived Benefits and Problems and the Perception of Single Words and Emotional Sounds
Schorr et al.
JSLHR 2009;52:141-152.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Population-Based Assessments of Ophthalmologic and Audiologic Follow-up in Children With Very Low Birth Weight Enrolled in Medicaid: A Quality-of-Care Study
Wang et al.
Pediatrics 2008;121:e278-e285.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Health Status and Health-Related Quality of Life Preference-Based Outcomes of Children Who Are Aged 7 to 9 Years and Have Bilateral Permanent Childhood Hearing Impairment
Petrou et al.
Pediatrics 2007;120:1044-1052.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Speech Recognition in Noise in Children With Cochlear Implants While Listening in Bilateral, Bimodal, and FM-System Arrangements
Schafer and Thibodeau
AJA 2006;15:114-126.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Health-Related Quality of Life and Hearing Aids: A Tutorial
Abrams et al.
TRENDS AMPLIF 2005;9:99-109.
ABSTRACT  

Cost-Effectiveness of Conjugate Meningococcal Vaccination Strategies in the United States
Shepard et al.
Pediatrics 2005;115:1220-1232.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Quality-Adjusted Life-Years Lack Quality in Pediatric Care: A Critical Review of Published Cost-Utility Studies in Child Health
Griebsch et al.
Pediatrics 2005;115:e600-e614.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Effects of Central Nervous System Residua on Cochlear Implant Results in Children Deafened by Meningitis
Francis et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004;130:604-611.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Children With Cochlear Implants: Changing Parent and Deaf Community Perspectives
Christiansen and Leigh
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004;130:673-677.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Trends in Cochlear Implants
Zeng
TRENDS AMPLIF 2004;8:1-34.
ABSTRACT  

Newborn Screening by Tandem Mass Spectrometry for Medium-Chain Acyl-CoA Dehydrogenase Deficiency: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
Venditti et al.
Pediatrics 2003;112:1005-1015.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Comparison of Directly Elicited Preferences to Preferences Derived from the SF-36 in Adults with Asthma
Lee et al.
Med Decis Making 2003;23:323-334.
ABSTRACT  

Screening and Management of Adult Hearing Loss in Primary Care: Scientific Review
Yueh et al.
JAMA 2003;289:1976-1985.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A Cost-Utility Scenario Analysis of Bilateral Cochlear Implantation
Summerfield et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2002;128:1255-1262.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Projected Cost-Effectiveness of Statewide Universal Newborn Hearing Screening
Keren et al.
Pediatrics 2002;110:855-864.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Prevalence of permanent childhood hearing impairment in the United Kingdom and implications for universal neonatal hearing screening: questionnaire based ascertainment study Commentary: Universal newborn hearing screening: implications for coordinating and developing services for deaf and hearing impaired children
Fortnum et al.
BMJ 2001;323:536-536.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Cochlear implants may offer sound solution to hearing-impaired children
Wallace
AAP News 2001;18:51-60.
FULL TEXT  

Cochlear Implants in Children Are Cost-Effective
JWatch General 2000;2000:6-6.
FULL TEXT