You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 285 No. 13, April 4, 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Original Contribution
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (90)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Neurology
 •Cerebrovascular Disease
 •Stroke
 •Randomized Controlled Trial
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Glycine Antagonist in Neuroprotection for Patients With Acute Stroke

GAIN Americas: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Ralph L. Sacco, MD,MS; Janet T. DeRosa, MPH; E. Clarke Haley, Jr, MD; Bruce Levin, PhD; Paul Ordronneau, PhD; Stephen J. Phillips, MBBS,FRCPC; Tanja Rundek, MD,PhD; Rose G. Snipes, MD; John L. P. Thompson, PhD; for the GAIN Americas Investigators

JAMA. 2001;285:1719-1728.

Context  Elucidation of the ischemic cascade has helped stimulate development of neuroprotective drugs aimed at limiting brain injury in the hours following an ischemic stroke. To date, none of these drugs has shown clinical efficacy.

Objective  To examine the efficacy of gavestinel (GV150526), an antagonist of the glycine site of the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor, as a neuroprotective therapy for acute ischemic stroke when administered within 6 hours of symptom onset.

Design  The Glycine Antagonist in Neuroprotection (GAIN) Americas trial, a randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled trial with enrollment from April 1998 to October 1999.

Setting  One hundred thirty-two hospital centers across the United States and Canada.

Patients  The primary efficacy population consisted of 1367 ischemic stroke patients with a predefined level of limb weakness and functional independence prior to stroke, stratified at randomization by age (<=75 vs >75 years) and initial stroke severity (National Institutes of Health [NIH] Stroke Scale scores of 2-5, 6-13, or >=14).

Intervention  Patients were randomly assigned to receive an intravenous loading dose (800 mg) plus 5 maintenance doses (200 mg every 12 hours) of gavestinel (n = 701) or placebo (n = 666) for 3 days.

Main Outcome Measure  Functional capability at 3 months, measured by the Barthel Index (BI), with scores trichotomized as dead/0-55, 60-90, and 95-100, compared between the gavestinel and placebo groups.

Results  Treatment groups were well matched for baseline characteristics. For each group, median NIH Stroke Scale was 12, median age was 72 years, and median time to treatment was 5.2 hours. No statistically significant improvement on the 3-month BI trichotomy was demonstrated for gavestinel (P = .79). The proportion who were functionally independent (BI score = 95-100) was 39% in the gavestinel group and 37% in the placebo group. No statistically significant difference in 3-month survival was observed using Kaplan-Meier curves (P = .11). No other secondary end point suggested an advantage for gavestinel. Among the 333 patients (24%) who received recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator, there was also no benefit for gavestinel (P = .53). There were no serious safety issues.

Conclusion  In this study, gavestinel administered up to 6 hours after an acute ischemic stroke did not improve functional outcome at 3 months.


Author Affiliations: Columbia University and the New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY (Drs Sacco, Levin, Rundek, Thompson, and Ms DeRosa); University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville (Dr Haley); Glaxo Wellcome Inc, Research Triangle Park, NC (Drs Ordronneau and Snipes); and Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia (Dr Phillips).


RELATED ARTICLES

Neuroprotection in Acute Ischemic Stroke
Fred Plum
JAMA. 2001;285(13):1760-1761.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

April 4, 2001
JAMA. 2001;285(13):1777-1778.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Dysphagia treatment post stroke: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials
Foley et al.
Age Ageing 2008;37:258-264.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Optimal Adaptive Design in Clinical Drug Development: A Simulation Example
Maloney et al.
J Clin Pharmacol 2007;47:1231-1243.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Clinical Diagnosis of Lacunar Stroke in the First 6 Hours After Symptom Onset: Analysis of Data From the Glycine Antagonist In Neuroprotection (GAIN) Americas Trial
Phillips et al.
Stroke 2007;38:2706-2711.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Virtual International Stroke Trials Archive
Ali et al.
Stroke 2007;38:1905-1910.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Validation of an Acute Ischemic Stroke Model: Does Diffusion-Weighted Imaging Lesion Volume Offer a Clinically Significant Improvement in Prediction of Outcome? * Definitions and Explanations
Johnston et al.
Stroke 2007;38:1820-1825.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Life After Cerovive: A Personal Perspective on Ischemic Neuroprotection in the Post-NXY-059 Era
Ginsberg
Stroke 2007;38:1967-1972.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Guidelines for the Early Management of Adults With Ischemic Stroke: A Guideline From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Stroke Council, Clinical Cardiology Council, Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention Council, and the Atherosclerotic Peripheral Vascular Disease and Quality of Care Outcomes in Research Interdisciplinary Working Groups: The American Academy of Neurology affirms the value of this guideline as an educational tool for neurologists.
Adams et al.
Circulation 2007;115:e478-e534.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Guidelines for the Early Management of Adults With Ischemic Stroke: A Guideline From the American Heart Association/ American Stroke Association Stroke Council, Clinical Cardiology Council, Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention Council, and the Atherosclerotic Peripheral Vascular Disease and Quality of Care Outcomes in Research Interdisciplinary Working Groups: The American Academy of Neurology affirms the value of this guideline as an educational tool for neurologists
Adams et al.
Stroke 2007;38:1655-1711.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Sex as a predictor of outcomes in patients treated with thrombolysis for acute stroke
Elkind et al.
Neurology 2007;68:842-848.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Outcomes Validity and Reliability of the Modified Rankin Scale: Implications for Stroke Clinical Trials: A Literature Review and Synthesis
Banks and Marotta
Stroke 2007;38:1091-1096.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Prior TIA, lipid-lowering drug use, and physical activity decrease ischemic stroke severity
Deplanque et al.
Neurology 2006;67:1403-1410.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

High-sensitivity C-reactive protein, lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2, and outcome after ischemic stroke.
Elkind et al.
Arch Intern Med 2006;166:2073-2080.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Recurrent stroke and cardiac risks after first ischemic stroke: The Northern Manhattan Study
Dhamoon et al.
Neurology 2006;66:641-646.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Cortical spreading depression and peri-infarct depolarization in acutely injured human cerebral cortex
Fabricius et al.
Brain 2006;129:778-790.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Recruiting Subjects for Acute Stroke Trials: A Meta-Analysis
Elkins et al.
Stroke 2006;37:123-128.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Comparison of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale With Disability Outcome Measures in Acute Stroke Trials
Young et al.
Stroke 2005;36:2187-2192.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Gavestinel Does Not Improve Outcome After Acute Intracerebral Hemorrhage: An Analysis From the GAIN International and GAIN Americas Studies
Haley et al.
Stroke 2005;36:1006-1010.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Group Sequential Design for Comparative Diagnostic Accuracy Studies: Implications and Guidelines for Practitioners
Mazumdar
Med Decis Making 2004;24:525-533.
ABSTRACT  

Health Care Resource Use After Acute Stroke in the Glycine Antagonist in Neuroprotection (GAIN) Americas Trial
Rundek et al.
Stroke 2004;35:1368-1374.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Sample Size Calculations in Acute Stroke Trials: A Systematic Review of Their Reporting, Characteristics, and Relationship With Outcome
Weaver et al.
Stroke 2004;35:1216-1224.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Assessing the Validity of Published Randomized Controlled Trials in Podiatric Medical Journals
Turlik et al.
J. Am. Podiatr. Med. Assoc. 2003;93:392-398.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Use of the Original, Modified, or New Intracerebral Hemorrhage Score to Predict Mortality and Morbidity After Intracerebral Hemorrhage
Cheung and Zou
Stroke 2003;34:1717-1722.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

UK-279,276, a Neutrophil Inhibitory Glycoprotein, in Acute Stroke: Tolerability and Pharmacokinetics
Lees et al.
Stroke 2003;34:1704-1709.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients With Ischemic Stroke: A Scientific Statement From the Stroke Council of the American Stroke Association
Adams et al.
Stroke 2003;34:1056-1083.
FULL TEXT  

Stroke Impact Scale-16: A brief assessment of physical function
Duncan et al.
Neurology 2003;60:291-296.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

HuEP5C7 as a Humanized Monoclonal Anti-E/P-Selectin Neurovascular Protective Strategy in a Blinded Placebo-Controlled Trial of Nonhuman Primate Stroke
Mocco et al.
Circ. Res. 2002;91:907-914.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Toward Wisdom From Failure: Lessons From Neuroprotective Stroke Trials and New Therapeutic Directions
Gladstone et al.
Stroke 2002;33:2123-2136.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Modified National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale for Use in Stroke Clinical Trials: Prospective Reliability and Validity
Meyer et al.
Stroke 2002;33:1261-1266.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Neuroprotection Is Unlikely to Be Effective in Humans Using Current Trial Designs: An Opposing View
Lees
Stroke 2002;33:308-309.
FULL TEXT  

Neuroprotection in Acute Ischemic Stroke
Plum
JAMA 2001;285:1760-1761.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2001 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.