You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 285 No. 18, May 9, 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Original Contribution
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (116)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Women's Health
 •Women's Health, Other
 •Randomized Controlled Trial
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati
What's this?

Evaluation of Contraceptive Efficacy and Cycle Control of a Transdermal Contraceptive Patch vs an Oral Contraceptive

A Randomized Controlled Trial

Marie-Claude Audet, MD; Michèle Moreau, MD; William D. Koltun, MD; Arthur S. Waldbaum, MD; Gary Shangold, MD; Alan C. Fisher, DrPH; George W. Creasy, MD; for the ORTHO EVRA/EVRA 004 Study Group

JAMA. 2001;285:2347-2354.

Context  Oral contraceptive (OC) pills are effective, but poor compliance increases rates of pregnancy during treatment.

Objective  To compare the contraceptive efficacy, cycle control, compliance, and safety of a transdermal contraceptive patch and an OC.

Design  Randomized, open-label, parallel-group trial conducted October 1997 to June 1999.

Setting  Forty-five clinics in the United States and Canada.

Participants  A total of 1417 healthy adult women of child-bearing potential.

Interventions  Participants were randomly assigned to receive a transdermal contraceptive patch (n = 812) vs an OC (n = 605) for 6 or 13 cycles. Patch treatment consisted of application of 3 consecutive 7-day patches followed by 1 patch-free week.

Main Outcome Measures  Overall and method-failure Pearl Indexes (number of pregnancies/100 person-years of use) and life-table estimates of the probability of pregnancy were calculated. Cycle control, compliance, patch adhesion, and adverse events were also assessed.

Results  Overall and method-failure Pearl Indexes were numerically lower with the patch (1.24 and 0.99, respectively) vs the OC (2.18 and 1.25, respectively); this difference was not statistically significant (P = .57 and .80, respectively). The incidence of breakthrough bleeding and/or spotting was significantly higher only in the first 2 cycles in the patch group, but the incidence of breakthrough bleeding alone was comparable between treatments in all cycles. The mean proportion of participants' cycles with perfect compliance was 88.2% (811 total participants, 5141 total cycles) with the patch and 77.7% (605 total participants, 4134 total cycles) with the OC (P < .001). Only 1.8% (300/16 673) of patches completely detached. Both treatments were similarly well tolerated; however, application site reactions, breast discomfort, and dysmenorrhea were significantly more common in the patch group.

Conclusion  The contraceptive patch is comparable to a combination OC in contraceptive efficacy and cycle control. Compliance was better with the weekly contraceptive patch than with the OC.


Author Affiliations: Centre Médical des Halles de Ste-Foy, Ste-Foy, Quebec (Dr Audet); Departement d'obstetrique-gynecologie, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, Quebec (Dr Moreau); Medical Center for Women's Clinical Research, San Diego, Calif (Dr Koltun); Department of Clinical Research, The R. W. Johnson Pharmaceutical Research Institute, Raritan, NJ (Drs Shangold, Fisher, and Creasy). Dr Waldbaum is in private practice in Denver, Colo.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

May 9, 2001
JAMA. 2001;285(18):2393-2394.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Obesity and Oral Contraceptive Failure: Findings from the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth
Brunner Huber and Toth
Am J Epidemiol 2007;166:1306-1311.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Contraception and Adolescents
Committee on Adolescence
Pediatrics 2007;120:1135-1148.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Rationale for transdermal drug administration in Alzheimer disease
Oertel et al.
Neurology 2007;69:S4-S9.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Caregiver preference for rivastigmine patches versus capsules for the treatment of Alzheimer disease
Blesa et al.
Neurology 2007;69:S23-S28.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Polyvinyl Alcohol--Gelatin Patches of Salicylic Acid: Preparation, Characterization and Drug Release Studies
Pal et al.
J Biomater Appl 2006;21:75-91.
ABSTRACT  

Hormonal Contraception Update
David et al.
Mayo Clin Proc. 2006;81:949-955.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Advances in the management of endometriosis: an update for clinicians
Crosignani et al.
Hum Reprod Update 2006;12:179-189.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Intramuscular Testosterone Enanthate Plus Very Low Dosage Oral Levonorgestrel Suppresses Spermatogenesis Without Causing Weight Gain in Normal Young Men: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Anawalt et al.
J Androl 2005;26:405-413.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Recent Advances in Hormonal and Barrier Contraception
Raney and Methot
Journal of Pharmacy Practice 2003;16:209-217.
ABSTRACT  

Two New Approaches to Hormonal Contraception for Women: Patches and Vaginal Rings
JWatch Women's Health 2001;2001:10-10.
FULL TEXT  

Two New Approaches to Hormonal Contraception for Women: Patches and Vaginal Rings
JWatch General 2001;2001:1-1.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2001 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.