You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 285 No. 2, January 10, 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Review
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (83)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in JAMA

Interferon and Ribavirin vs Interferon Alone in the Re-treatment of Chronic Hepatitis C Previously Nonresponsive to Interferon

A Meta-analysis of Randomized Trials

Kristin J. Cummings, MD, MPH; Shing M. Lee, ScM; Emily S. West, BA; Javier Cid-Ruzafa, MD, MPH; Steven G. Fein, MD, MPH; Yutaka Aoki, MS, NHS, ME; Mark S. Sulkowski, MD; Steven N. Goodman, MD, PhD

JAMA. 2001;285:193-199.

Context  Hepatitis C is the leading cause of chronic liver disease in the United States. Several trials have found that interferon and ribavirin combination therapy is more efficacious than interferon monotherapy for previously untreated patients and those who relapsed after prior interferon monotherapy, but its effectiveness for nonresponders to prior interferon monotherapy is unclear.

Objective  To assess the efficacy and safety of interferon and ribavirin vs interferon alone for treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis C who previously did not respond to interferon monotherapy.

Data Sources  A systematic search was performed using MEDLINE and the Science Citation Index for publications from 1966 to December 1999. A manual reference search and a manual review of relevant specialty journals also were performed, and input from clinical hepatology experts was sought.

Study Selection  Included studies were randomized, controlled clinical trials comparing interferon and ribavirin with interferon alone and reporting virological and biochemical outcomes after a follow-up period. Of 50 identified studies, 12 trials (941 patients) were included in the analysis.

Data Extraction  Two investigators reviewed trials independently for methods, inclusion and exclusion criteria, and outcomes. Disagreements were resolved by discussion. Abstracted data included study and patient characteristics and virological, biochemical, and histological outcomes. A quality evaluation questionnaire was used to score studies.

Data Synthesis  The pooled virological response rate for combination therapy was 14% (95% confidence interval [CI], 11%-17%), with a risk difference favoring combination therapy of 7% (95% CI, 2%-13%). Use of interferon alfa-2a/2b and ribavirin, 1000 to 1200 mg/d, was associated with a pooled virological response rate of 18% and a risk difference of 16% (95% CI, 11%-21%). When interferon alfa-n/n3 and a lower dosage of ribavirin (600-800 mg/d) were used, the risk difference was 0% (95% CI, –7% to 7%). Combination therapy was associated with more adverse effects and an increased rate of discontinuation of treatment compared with interferon monotherapy.

Conclusions  For chronic hepatitis C that is nonresponsive to prior interferon monotherapy, combination therapy is more effective than re-treatment with interferon alone. Response rates remain less than 20% even in the most responsive subgroups, demonstrating a need for better therapeutic options.


Author Affiliations: Departments of International Health (Dr Cummings), Epidemiology (Ms West and Drs Fein and Goodman), Health Policy and Management, Health Services Research and Development Center (Dr Cid-Ruzafa), and Environmental Health Sciences (Mr Aoki), Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health; and Departments of Oncology (Ms Lee and Dr Goodman) and Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases (Dr Sulkowski), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md. Dr Cummings is now with the Department of Medicine, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, Calif, and Dr Fein is now with the Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC.


RELATED ARTICLES

Nonresponse to Interferon in Chronic Hepatitis C: Re-treatment Redux
Raymond S. Koff
JAMA. 2001;285(2):212-214.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

January 10, 2001
JAMA. 2001;285(2):229-230.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Combination Therapy of Interferon and Ribavirin Versus Interferon Monotherapy in Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis C: A Meta-analysis of Clinical Trials
Khader et al.
Journal of Pharmacy Practice 2006;19:265-274.
ABSTRACT  

De Novo Initiation Pocket Mutations Have Multiple Effects on Hepatitis C Virus RNA-Dependent RNA Polymerase Activities
Ranjith-Kumar et al.
J. Virol. 2004;78:12207-12217.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Heterogeneous Virologic Response Rates to Interferon-Based Therapy in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis C: Who Responds Less Well?
Zeuzem
ANN INTERN MED 2004;140:370-381.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Treatment for Hepatitis C Virus in Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Infected Patients: Clinical Benefits and Cost-effectiveness
Kuehne et al.
Arch Intern Med 2002;162:2545-2556.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Retreatment with interferon plus ribavirin of chronic hepatitis C non-responders to interferon monotherapy: a meta-analysis of individual patient data
Camma et al.
Gut 2002;51:864-869.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Interferon alfa with or without ribavirin for chronic hepatitis C: systematic review of randomised trials
Kjaergard et al.
BMJ 2001;323:1151-1155.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Nonresponse to Interferon in Chronic Hepatitis C: Re-treatment Redux
Koff
JAMA 2001;285:212-214.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2001 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.