You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 285 No. 2, January 10, 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Health Law and Ethics
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (39)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related letter
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in JAMA

Protecting the Privacy of Family Members in Survey and Pedigree Research

Jeffrey R. Botkin, MD,MPH

JAMA. 2001;285:207-211.

The recent controversy at Virginia Commonwealth University involving research ethics raises important and complex issues in survey and pedigree research. The primary questions are whether family members of survey respondents themselves become subjects of the project and if they are subjects whether informed consent must be obtained for investigators to retain private information on these individuals. This article provides an analysis of the ethical issues and regulatory standards involved in this debate for consideration by investigators and institutional review boards. The analysis suggests that strong protections for the rights and welfare of subjects and their family members can be incorporated into survey and pedigree research protocols without hindering projects with extensive consent requirements.


Author Affiliation: Departments of Pediatrics and Medical Ethics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City.


RELATED LETTER

Protecting the Privacy of Family Members in Research
Douglas F. Levinson, Theodore Reich, Richard D. Todd, Myrne M. Weissman, Raymond R. Crowe, Lynn DeLisi, Stephen V. Faraone, Susan Folstein, Mary Kay Pelias, Ann E. Pulver, Jeremy M. Silverman, Walter E. Nance, Carleen A. Brunelli, Leonard A. Zwelling, Donna T. Chen, Bradford B. Worrall, James F. Meschia, and Jeffrey R. Botkin
JAMA. 2001;285(15):1960-1963.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

RELATED ARTICLE

January 10, 2001
JAMA. 2001;285(2):229-230.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

The routinisation of genomics and genetics: implications for ethical practices.
Foster et al.
J. Med. Ethics 2006;32:635-638.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Family Caregiver Research and the HIPAA Factor
Albert and Levine
Gerontologist 2005;45:432-437.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Tobacco Use in Intimate Spaces: Issues in the Study of Couple Dynamics
Bottorff et al.
Qual Health Res 2005;15:564-577.
ABSTRACT  

The impact of privacy protections on recruitment in a multicenter stroke genetics study
Chen et al.
Neurology 2005;64:721-724.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Confidentiality and the ethics of medical ethics
Rogers and Draper
J. Med. Ethics 2003;29:220-224.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Race, Ethnicity, and Genomics: Social Classifications as Proxies of Biological Heterogeneity
Foster and Sharp
Genome Res 2002;12:844-850.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Ethical Issues in Human Genome Epidemiology: A Case Study Based on The Japanese American Family Study in Seattle, Washington
Austin
Am J Epidemiol 2002;155:585-592.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Informed Consent for Population-Based Research Involving Genetics
Beskow et al.
JAMA 2001;286:2315-2321.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

National Health Information Privacy: Regulations Under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act
Gostin
JAMA 2001;285:3015-3021.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Protecting the Privacy of Family Members in Research
Levinson et al.
JAMA 2001;285:1960-1963.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2001 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.