You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 285 No. 21, June 6, 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Original Contribution
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (93)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related letter
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in JAMA

Mortality and Locomotion 6 Months After Hospitalization for Hip Fracture

Risk Factors and Risk-Adjusted Hospital Outcomes

Edward L. Hannan, PhD; Jay Magaziner, PhD; Jason J. Wang, MA,MS; Elizabeth A. Eastwood, PhD; Stacey B. Silberzweig, MS,RD; Marvin Gilbert, MD; R. Sean Morrison, MD; Mary Ann McLaughlin, MD,MPH; Gretchen M. Orosz, MD; Albert L. Siu, MD,MSPH

JAMA. 2001;285:2736-2742.

Context  Hip fracture is a common clinical problem that leads to considerable mortality and disability. A need exists for a practical means to monitor and improve outcomes, including function, for patients with hip fracture.

Objectives  To identify and compare the importance of significant prefracture predictors of functional status and mortality at 6 months for patients hospitalized with hip fracture and to compare risk-adjusted outcomes for hospitals providing initial care.

Design  Prospective study with data obtained from medical records and through structured interviews with patients and proxies.

Setting and Participants  A total of 571 adults aged 50 years or older with hip fracture who were admitted to 4 New York, NY, metropolitan hospitals between August 1997 and August 1998.

Main Outcome Measures  In-hospital and 6-month mortality; locomotion at 6 months; and adverse outcomes at 6 months, defined as death or needing assistance to ambulate, compared by hospital, adjusting for patient risk factors.

Results  The in-hospital mortality rate was 1.6%. At 6 months, the mortality rate was 13.5%, and another 12.8% needed total assistance to ambulate. Laboratory values were strong predictors of mortality but were not significantly associated with locomotion. Age and prefracture residence at a nursing home were significant predictors of locomotion (P = .02 for both) but were not significantly associated with mortality. Adjustment for baseline characteristics either substantially augmented or diminished interhospital differences in outcomes. Two hospitals had 1 outcome (functional status or mortality) that was significantly worse than the overall mean while the other outcome was nonsignificantly better than average.

Conclusions  Mortality and functional status ideally should be considered both together and individually to distinguish effects limited to one or the other outcome. Hospital performance for these 2 measures may differ substantially after adjustment, probably because different processes of care are important to each outcome.


Author Affiliations: Department of Health Policy, Management, and Behavior, University at Albany—State University of New York, School of Public Health, Rensselaer, NY (Dr Hannan); Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Maryland at Baltimore (Dr Magaziner); Departments of Health Policy (Mr Wang and Drs McLaughlin and Siu), Rehabilitation Medicine (Dr Eastwood), Orthopaedics (Dr Gilbert), Geriatrics and Adult Development (Drs Morrison, McLaughlin, Orosz, and Siu and Ms Silberzweig), and Medicine (Drs McLaughlin, Orosz, and Siu), Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY.


RELATED LETTER

Risks of Postmenopausal Hormone Replacement
Nina Radford, Tim Church, Frank E. Speizer, Beverley E. Pearson Murphy, Susan R. Davis, Henry G. Burger, William H. Goodson III, Henk R. Franke, Ishay Lev, Amnon Lahad, Aharon Karni, Eric Brunner, Raanan Gillon, Houston H. Stokes, Edeltraut Garbe, Samy Suissa, Sean I. Savitz, and Lou Caplan
JAMA. 2002;288(22):2819-2824.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

RELATED ARTICLES

June 6, 2001
JAMA. 2001;285(21):2793-2794.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Hip Fractures
JAMA. 2001;285(21):2814.
PDF  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Use of proton pump inhibitors and risk of osteoporosis-related fractures
Targownik et al.
CMAJ 2008;179:319-326.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Association of Race, Gender, and Comorbidity With Mortality and Function After Hip Fracture
Penrod et al.
J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 2008;63:867-872.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Patient Risk Factors, Operative Care, and Outcomes Among Older Community-Dwelling Male Veterans with Hip Fracture
Radcliff et al.
JBJS 2008;90:34-42.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Zoledronic Acid and Clinical Fractures and Mortality after Hip Fracture
Lyles et al.
NEJM 2007;357:1799-1809.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Hospital volume and stroke outcome: Does it matter?
Saposnik et al.
Neurology 2007;69:1142-1151.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Early ambulation after hip fracture: effects on function and mortality.
Siu et al.
Arch Intern Med 2006;166:766-771.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Prevention of Osteoporosis Associated With Chronic Glucocorticoid Therapy
Heffernan et al.
JAMA 2006;295:1300-1303.
FULL TEXT  

Incidence of and Risk Factors for Falls Following Hip Fracture in Community-dwelling Older Adults
Shumway-Cook et al.
ptjournal 2005;85:648-655.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Rules for Rehabilitation: An Agenda for Research
Weinrich et al.
Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2005;19:72-83.
ABSTRACT  

Low Incidence of Delirium in Very Old Patients After Surgery for Hip Fractures
Kagansky et al.
AJGP 2004;12:306-314.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Effects of Estrogen Plus Progestin on Risk of Fracture and Bone Mineral Density: The Women's Health Initiative Randomized Trial
Cauley et al.
JAMA 2003;290:1729-1738.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Changes in Functional Status Attributable to Hip Fracture: A Comparison of Hip Fracture Patients to Community-dwelling Aged
Magaziner et al.
Am J Epidemiol 2003;157:1023-1031.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Priorities in Perioperative Geriatrics
Cook and Rooke
Anesth. Analg. 2003;96:1823-1836.
FULL TEXT  

Frequency and Impact of Active Clinical Issues and New Impairments on Hospital Discharge in Patients With Hip Fracture
Halm et al.
Arch Intern Med 2003;163:107-112.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Editorial: Hot Topics in Geriatrics
Morley
J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 2003;58:M30-36.
FULL TEXT  

Risks of Postmenopausal Hormone Replacement
Radford et al.
JAMA 2002;288:2819-2824.
FULL TEXT  

Undertreatment of Osteoporosis in Men With Hip Fracture
Kiebzak et al.
Arch Intern Med 2002;162:2217-2222.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Evaluating the components of the Exercise Plus Program: rationale, theory and implementation
Resnick et al.
Health Educ Res 2002;17:648-658.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Diabetes Mellitus as a Risk Factor for Hip Fracture in Mexican American Older Adults
Ottenbacher et al.
J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 2002;57:M648-653.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Home Visits to Prevent Nursing Home Admission and Functional Decline in Elderly People: Systematic Review and Meta-regression Analysis
Stuck et al.
JAMA 2002;287:1022-1028.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2001 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.