You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 285 No. 3, January 17, 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Original Contribution
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (30)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Infectious Diseases, Other
 •Infectious Diseases
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Derivation and Validation of Guidelines for Stool Cultures for Enteropathogenic Bacteria Other Than Clostridium difficile in Hospitalized Adults

Tilman M. Bauer, MD; Ajit Lalvani, MRCP; Jürgen Fehrenbach, MD; Ingrid Steffen, MD; John J. Aponte, MD; Roberto Segovia, MD; Jordi Vila, MD; Gabi Philippczik, MD; Bernhard Steinbrückner, MD; Reno Frei, MD; Ian Bowler, MRCPath; Manfred Kist, MD

JAMA. 2001;285:313-319.

Context  The yield of in-hospital stool cultures performed more than 72 hours after admission is low, and a commonly used policy dictates that laboratories reject these cultures to save costs. However, enteropathogenic bacteria other than Clostridium difficile (EPB) may cause nosocomial illness that would be missed by use of such a "3-day rule."

Objective  To develop guidelines for hospital use of stool cultures that are sensitive to clinically relevant cases of sporadic and epidemic nosocomial diarrhea.

Design  Five-part study that incorporated a derivation sample based on retrospective chart review and a prospective cohort study (including cost savings analysis), and a validation sample based on retrospective chart review.

Setting  Four European academic health care centers.

Patients  Derivation sample: 1735 adult inpatients from whom 3416 stool cultures were obtained during a 19-month period (1995-1997) and 68 adult inpatients for whom EPB were grown from stool cultures during a 10-year period (1988-1998); validation sample: 65 patients with sporadic isolation of EPB (1993-1998), 56 patients involved in 2 nosocomial Salmonella outbreaks (1992 and 1997), and 330 patients who had stool cultures performed (1998).

Main Outcome Measure  Performance of derived criteria in detecting pathogenic bacteria and outbreaks and reducing total number of stool cultures performed.

Results  Stool cultures grew EPB in 3.3% of samples obtained <=72 hours after admission and 0.5% of samples obtained thereafter (P<.001). Isolation of EPB >72 hours after admission was not associated with clinical symptoms or signs but was associated with community-acquired diarrhea (24%), age 65 years or older with preexisting comorbid disease (25%), neutropenia (13%), HIV infection (10%), and nondiarrheal manifestations of enteric infections (16%). Twelve percent were asymptomatic carriers. These characteristics were used to create criteria for selecting patients for whom stool cultures would be indicated. These criteria were applied post hoc to a series of 1025 stool cultures; the number of stool cultures would have been reduced by 52% and no clinically significant cases would have been missed. Annual savings to a 355-bed institution would be approximately $7800 for reagent costs and 75 hours of technician time. In the validation samples, only 2 patients of 65 who had EPB would not have been identified, and neither required treatment. If the 3-day rule had been applied, 52 cases would not have been identified, 28 of which required antibiotic treatment.

Conclusion  Our modified 3-day rule for use in selecting cases for stool culture is sensitive to sporadic and epidemic cases of nosocomial diarrhea in hospitalized adults.


Author Affiliations: Department of Internal Medicine II (Drs Bauer, Fehrenbach, and Philippczik) and Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene (Drs Steinbrückner and Kist), University Hospital, Freiburg, Germany; Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Oxford (Dr Lalvani), and Department of Microbiology, John Radcliffe Hospital (Dr Bowler), Oxford, England; Bacteriological Laboratory, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland (Drs Steffen and Frei); and Departments of Microbiology (Dr Vila), Gastroenterology and Hepatology (Dr Segovia), and Epidemiology and Biostatistics Unit (Dr Aponte), Hospital Clínic, IDIBAPS, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLES

January 17, 2001
JAMA. 2001;285(3):347-348.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Preventing Dehydration From Diarrhea
JAMA. 2001;285(3):362.
PDF  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Salmonella Oranienburg Infections Associated With Fruit Salad Served in Health-Care Facilities Northeastern United States and Canada, 2006
JAMA 2007;298:2362-2364.
FULL TEXT  

Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs in Health Care Systems
MacDougall and Polk
Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2005;18:638-656.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Avoiding laboratory pitfalls in infectious diseases
Lo and Smego
Postgrad. Med. J. 2004;80:660-662.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Acute Infectious Diarrhea
Thielman and Guerrant
NEJM 2004;350:38-47.
FULL TEXT  

Antibiotic-Associated Diarrhea
Bartlett
NEJM 2002;346:334-339.
FULL TEXT  

ADDITIONAL ARTICLES ABSTRACTED IN ACP JOURNAL CLUB
Evid. Based Med. 2001;6:132-132.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2001 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.