You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 286 No. 12, September 26, 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Original Contribution
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (125)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Quality of Care
 •Evidence-Based Medicine
 •Quality of Care, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Validity of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Clinical Practice Guidelines

How Quickly Do Guidelines Become Outdated?

Paul G. Shekelle, MD,PhD; Eduardo Ortiz, MD,MPH; Shannon Rhodes, MFA; Sally C. Morton, PhD; Martin P. Eccles, MD; Jeremy M. Grimshaw, MD; Steven H. Woolf, MD,MPH

JAMA. 2001;286:1461-1467.

Context  Practice guidelines need to be up-to-date to be useful to clinicians. No published methods are available for assessing whether existing practice guidelines are still valid, nor does any empirical information exist regarding how often such assessments need to be made.

Objectives  To assess the current validity of 17 clinical practice guidelines published by the US Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) that are still in circulation, and to use this information to estimate how quickly guidelines become obsolete.

Design, Setting, and Participants  We developed criteria for defining when a guideline needs updating, mailed surveys to members of the original AHRQ guideline panels (n = 170; response rate, 71%), and searched the literature for evidence through March 2000 (n = 6994 titles yielding 173 articles plus 159 new guidelines on the same topics).

Main Outcome Measures  Identification of new evidence calling for a major, minor, or no update of the 17 guidelines; survival analysis of the rate at which guidelines became outdated.

Results  For 7 guidelines, new evidence and expert judgment indicated that a major update is required; 6 were found to be in need of a minor update; 3 were judged as still valid; and for 1 guideline, we could reach no conclusion. Survival analysis indicated that about half the guidelines were outdated in 5.8 years (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.0-6.6 years). The point at which no more than 90% of the guidelines were still valid was 3.6 years (95% CI, 2.6-4.6 years).

Conclusions  More than three quarters of the AHRQ guidelines need updating. As a general rule, guidelines should be reassessed for validity every 3 years.


Author Affiliations: Southern California Evidence-Based Practice Center/RAND Health Division, Santa Monica (Drs Shekelle and Morton and Ms Rhodes); Greater Los Angeles Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Los Angeles, Calif (Dr Shekelle); Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, and San Diego Veterans Affairs Health Care System, San Diego (Dr Ortiz); Centre for Health Services Research, University of Newcastle Upon Tyne, Newcastle Upon Tyne, England (Dr Eccles); Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, Scotland (Dr Grimshaw); and Department of Family Practice, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond (Dr Woolf).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLES

Development and Aftercare of Clinical Guidelines: The Balance Between Rigor and Pragmatism
George P. Browman
JAMA. 2001;286(12):1509-1511.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

September 26, 2001
JAMA. 2001;286(12):1519-1520.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Reassessment of Clinical Practice Guidelines: Go Gently Into That Good Night
Shaneyfelt and Centor
JAMA 2009;301:868-869.
FULL TEXT  

Heterogeneity in cancer guidelines: should we eradicate or tolerate?
Pentheroudakis et al.
Ann Oncol 2008;19:2067-2078.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Clinical Practice Guidelines as Learned Treatises: Understanding Their Use as Evidence in the Courtroom
Recupero
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law 2008;36:290-301.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guidelines: Opportunities and Challenges
Somerfield et al.
JCO 2008;26:4022-4026.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

When should measures be updated? Development of a conceptual framework for maintenance of quality-of-care measures
Mattke
Qual Saf Health Care 2008;17:182-186.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Using Existing Systematic Reviews in Complex Systematic Reviews
Whitlock et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2008;148:776-782.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Atoms
Bauchner
Arch. Dis. Child. 2008;93:1-1.
FULL TEXT  

Role of Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment in Altering Pain Biomarkers: A Pilot Study
Degenhardt et al.
JAOA: Journal of the American Osteopathic Association 2007;107:387-400.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

How Quickly Do Systematic Reviews Go Out of Date? A Survival Analysis
Shojania et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2007;147:224-233.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Social and Racial Differences in Selection of Breast Cancer Adjuvant Chemotherapy Regimens
Griggs et al.
JCO 2007;25:2522-2527.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Surgeon Characteristics and Variations in Treatment for Early-Stage Breast Cancer
Gilligan et al.
Arch Surg 2007;142:17-22.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

American Psychiatric Association Practice Guidelines for the Treatment of Psychiatric Disorders Compendium 2006
Glass
JAMA 2006;296:2620-2621.
FULL TEXT  

From outdated to updated, keeping clinical guidelines valid
Clark et al.
Int J Qual Health Care 2006;18:165-166.
FULL TEXT  

Weighing the evidence to formulate dietary guidelines.
Woolf
J. Am. Coll. Nutr. 2006;25:277S-284S.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

What sort of evidence do we need in primary care?
Mickan and Askew
BMJ 2006;332:619-620.
FULL TEXT  

Introduction
Culleton
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2006;17:S1-S3.
FULL TEXT  

Conflict between Guideline Methodologic Quality and Recommendation Validity: A Potential Problem for Practitioners
Watine et al.
Clin. Chem. 2006;52:65-72.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Relationship Between Procedure Indications and Outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Interventions by American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force Guidelines
Anderson et al.
Circulation 2005;112:2786-2791.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Evaluation and adaptation of clinical practice guidelines
Graham and Harrison
Evid. Based Nurs. 2005;8:68-72.
FULL TEXT  

Resources for Assisting Nurses to Use Evidence as a Basis for Home Care Nursing Practice
Rutledge
Home Health Care Management Practice 2005;17:273-280.
ABSTRACT  

The use of clinical guidelines for asthma, diabetes, and hypertension in primary health care
Lindberg et al.
Int J Qual Health Care 2005;17:217-220.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Quality of Evidence-Based Pediatric Guidelines
Boluyt et al.
Pediatrics 2005;115:1378-1391.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Standard-of-Care Testimony: Best Practices or Reasonable Care?
Simon
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law 2005;33:8-11.
FULL TEXT  

Commentary: Quality Improvement and Psychiatric Fitness-for-Duty Evaluations of Physicians
Wettstein
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law 2005;33:92-94.
FULL TEXT  

The Unique Role of Osteopathic Physicians in Treating Patients With Low Back Pain
Licciardone
JAOA: Journal of the American Osteopathic Association 2004;104:13S-18S.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Assessing the need to update prevention guidelines: a comparison of two methods
Gartlehner et al.
Int J Qual Health Care 2004;16:399-406.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Decision Guidelines for Prophylactic Replacement of Bjork-Shiley Convexo-Concave Heart Valves: Impact on Clinical Practice
van Gorp et al.
Circulation 2004;109:2092-2096.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Otitis Media With Effusion
American Academy of Family Physicians et al.
Pediatrics 2004;113:1412-1429.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Impact of Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Clinical Microbiology Laboratory
Gilligan
J. Clin. Microbiol. 2004;42:1391-1395.
FULL TEXT  

Family Physicians' Opinions and Attitudes to Three Clinical Practice Guidelines
Wolfe et al.
J Am Board Fam Med 2004;17:150-157.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Atoms
Bauchner
Arch. Dis. Child. 2003;88:1031-1031.
FULL TEXT  

Zen and the Art of Physician Autonomy Maintenance
Reinertsen
ANN INTERN MED 2003;138:992-995.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Discrepancy between Consensus Recommendations and Actual Community Use of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Women with Breast Cancer
Du et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2003;138:90-97.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

AAN clinical practice guidelines: Above the fray
Franklin and Zahn
Neurology 2002;59:975-976.
FULL TEXT  

Development of a pharmacist-coordinated system of chemotherapy protocols in an integrated healthcare delivery organization
L de Lemos and O'Brien
J Oncol Pharm Pract 2002;8:39-48.
ABSTRACT  

Practice Guidelines and Practicing Physicians--Who's Guiding Whom?
van Walraven
Clin. Chem. 2002;48:9-10.
FULL TEXT  

Building Bridges to Quality
Shaneyfelt
JAMA 2001;286:2600-2601.
FULL TEXT  

Updating guidelines on stable angina
Lancaster and Moher
BMJ 2001;323:1202-1202.
FULL TEXT  

Development and Aftercare of Clinical Guidelines: The Balance Between Rigor and Pragmatism
Browman
JAMA 2001;286:1509-1511.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2001 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.