You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 286 No. 21, December 5, 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Special Communication
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (57)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Health Policy
 •Law and Medicine
 •Public Health, Other
 •Bioterrorism
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Large-Scale Quarantine Following Biological Terrorism in the United States

Scientific Examination, Logistic and Legal Limits, and Possible Consequences

Joseph Barbera, MD; Anthony Macintyre, MD; Larry Gostin, JD, PhD; Tom Inglesby, MD; Tara O'Toole, MD; Craig DeAtley, PA-C; Kevin Tonat, DrPH, MPH; Marci Layton, MD

JAMA. 2001;286:2711-2717.

Concern for potential bioterrorist attacks causing mass casualties has increased recently. Particular attention has been paid to scenarios in which a biological agent capable of person-to-person transmission, such as smallpox, is intentionally released among civilians. Multiple public health interventions are possible to effect disease containment in this context. One disease control measure that has been regularly proposed in various settings is the imposition of large-scale or geographic quarantine on the potentially exposed population. Although large-scale quarantine has not been implemented in recent US history, it has been used on a small scale in biological hoaxes, and it has been invoked in federally sponsored bioterrorism exercises. This article reviews the scientific principles that are relevant to the likely effectiveness of quarantine, the logistic barriers to its implementation, legal issues that a large-scale quarantine raises, and possible adverse consequences that might result from quarantine action. Imposition of large-scale quarantine—compulsory sequestration of groups of possibly exposed persons or human confinement within certain geographic areas to prevent spread of contagious disease—should not be considered a primary public health strategy in most imaginable circumstances. In the majority of contexts, other less extreme public health actions are likely to be more effective and create fewer unintended adverse consequences than quarantine. Actions and areas for future research, policy development, and response planning efforts are provided.


Author Affiliations: Institute for Crisis and Disaster Management, George Washington University (Dr Barbera), and Department of Emergency Medicine, George Washington University Medical Center (Dr Macintyre and Mr DeAtley), Washington, DC; Center for Law & the Public's Health, Georgetown University and Johns Hopkins University (Dr Gostin), and Center for Civilian Biodefense, Johns Hopkins University (Drs Inglesby and O'Toole), Baltimore, Md; Office of Emergency Preparedness, Department of Health and Human Services, Rockville, Md (Dr Tonat); and Department of Public Health, New York, NY (Dr Layton).


RELATED ARTICLE

December 5, 2001
JAMA. 2001;286(21):2745-2746.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Is the Quarantine Act relevant?
Schabas
CMAJ 2007;176:1840-1842.
FULL TEXT  

Evidence and Effectiveness in Decisionmaking for Quarantine
Bensimon and Upshur
Am. J. Public Health 2007;97:S44-S48.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Public Health Strategies for Pandemic Influenza: Ethics and the Law
Gostin
JAMA 2006;295:1700-1704.
FULL TEXT  

Jacobson v Massachusetts: It's Not Your Great-Great-Grandfather's Public Health Law
Mariner et al.
Am. J. Public Health 2005;95:581-590.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Ethical and Legal Challenges Posed by Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome: Implications for the Control of Severe Infectious Disease Threats
Gostin et al.
JAMA 2003;290:3229-3237.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Ethics and SARS: lessons from Toronto
Singer et al.
BMJ 2003;327:1342-1344.
FULL TEXT  

Quarantine and Social Inequity
Edelson
JAMA 2003;290:2874-2874.
FULL TEXT  

Biochemical terrorism: too awful to contemplate, too serious to ignore: Subjective literature review
Alexander and Klein
Br. J. Psychiatry 2003;183:491-497.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Case Isolation and Contact Tracing Can Prevent the Spread of Smallpox
Eichner
Am J Epidemiol 2003;158:118-128.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

In the Wake of Terror
Kessel
JRSM 2003;96:364-365.
FULL TEXT  

The Public and the Smallpox Threat
Blendon et al.
NEJM 2003;348:426-432.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Model State Emergency Health Powers Act: Planning for and Response to Bioterrorism and Naturally Occurring Infectious Diseases
Gostin et al.
JAMA 2002;288:622-628.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Bioterrorism, Public Health, and Civil Liberties
Annas
NEJM 2002;346:1337-1342.
FULL TEXT  

The Case for Voluntary Smallpox Vaccination
Bicknell
NEJM 2002;346:1323-1325.
FULL TEXT  

The Case for Voluntary Smallpox Vaccination
Bicknell
NEJM 2002;346:1323-1325.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2001 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.