You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 286 No. 3, July 18, 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Caring for the Critically Ill Patient
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (63)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related letter
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Relationship Between Methodological Trial Quality and the Effects of Selective Digestive Decontamination on Pneumonia and Mortality in Critically Ill Patients

Christianne A. van Nieuwenhoven, MD; Erik Buskens, MD,PhD; Frank H. van Tiel, MD,PhD; Marc J. M. Bonten, MD,PhD

JAMA. 2001;286:335-340.

Context  Although meta-analyses of randomized trials have shown that selective digestive decontamination (SDD) prevents nosocomial pneumonia in critically ill patients, the influence of trial quality on the effectiveness of SDD has not been rigorously evaluated.

Objective  To assess the methodological quality of individual studies of SDD and its relation to the reported effects on pneumonia and mortality.

Design  Thirty-two studies were identified in a MEDLINE and reference list search and their methodological quality was assessed using a scoring system (range, 0-13 points) based on allocation and concealment, patient selection, patient characteristics, blinding of the intervention, and the definition of pneumonia.

Main Outcome Measure  Methodological quality of the primary trials and its effect on the relative risk reductions (RRRs) of SDD on pneumonia and mortality.

Results  The mean (SD) methodological quality score was 7.8 (2.9) (range, 1-11). The RRRs ranged from –0.1 to 1.0 for pneumonia and from –0.1 to 0.6 for mortality. The methodological quality score was associated with the RRR for pneumonia so that for each quality-point added, the RRR decreased by 5.8% (95% confidence interval, 2.4%-9.3%). No association between trial quality and the impact of SDD was found on mortality. Of the individual trial quality characteristics, patient selection, allocation of intervention, and blinding most strongly influenced the treatment effect.

Conclusions  The inverse relationship between methodological quality score and the benefit of SDD on the incidence of pneumonia may have resulted in overly optimistic estimates of SDD in prior meta-analyses. This emphasizes the importance of rigorous trial design in evaluating preventive interventions in the intensive care unit.


Author Affiliations: Department of Medical Microbiology, University Hospital Maastricht (Drs van Nieuwenhoven and van Tiel), Julius Center for General Practice and Patient Oriented Research (Dr Buskens) and Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases and AIDS (Dr Bonten), University Hospital Heidelberglaan, Utrecht, the Netherlands.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED LETTER

Influence of Methodological Quality on Study Conclusions
Alessandro Liberati, Roberto D'Amico, Luca Brazzi, Silvia Pifferi, Miguel Sánchez García, Jürgen Graf, Uwe Janssens, Kenneth F. Schulz, Willard Cates, Jr, Christianne A. van Nieuwenhoven, Frank H. van Tiel, Erik Buskens, and Marc J. M. Bonten
JAMA. 2001;286(20):2544-2547.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

RELATED ARTICLE

July 18, 2001
JAMA. 2001;286(3):359-360.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration
Liberati et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2009;151:W-65-W-94.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration
Liberati et al.
BMJ 2009;339:b2700-b2700.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Medical Statistics/Test-Taking Strategies
Kamp
ACCP Pulmonary Med Brd Rev 2009;25:295-308.
FULL TEXT  

Decontamination of the Digestive Tract and Oropharynx in ICU Patients
de Smet et al.
NEJM 2009;360:20-31.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Guidelines for the management of hospital-acquired pneumonia in the UK: Report of the Working Party on Hospital-Acquired Pneumonia of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
Masterton et al.
J Antimicrob Chemother 2008;62:5-34.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Effects of Prophylactic Antibiotic Therapy With Mezlocillin Plus Sulbactam on the Incidence and Height of Fever After Severe Acute Ischemic Stroke: The Mannheim Infection in Stroke Study (MISS)
Schwarz et al.
Stroke 2008;39:1220-1227.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Evidence on measures for the prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia
Lorente et al.
Eur Respir J 2007;30:1193-1207.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia in Neonatal and Pediatric Intensive Care Unit Patients
Foglia et al.
Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2007;20:409-425.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Oral Decontamination with Chlorhexidine Reduces the Incidence of Ventilator-associated Pneumonia
Koeman et al.
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2006;173:1348-1355.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Guidelines for the Management of Adults with Hospital-acquired, Ventilator-associated, and Healthcare-associated Pneumonia
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2005;171:388-416.
FULL TEXT  

Medical management of patients with multiple organ dysfunction arising from acute radiation syndrome
Jackson et al.
Br. J. Radiol. 2005;Supplement_27:161-168.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guideline for the Prevention of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia
Dodek et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2004;141:305-313.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Prevention of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia: An Evidence-Based Systematic Review
Collard et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2003;138:494-501.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Influence of Combined Intravenous and Topical Antibiotic Prophylaxis on the Incidence of Infections, Organ Dysfunctions, and Mortality in Critically Ill Surgical Patients: A Prospective, Stratified, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-controlled Clinical Trial
Krueger et al.
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2002;166:1029-1037.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Influence of Methodological Quality on Study Conclusions
Liberati et al.
JAMA 2001;286:2544-2547.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2001 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.