 |
|
Mandatory Reporting of Domestic Violence Injuries to the Police
What Do Emergency Department Patients Think?
Michael A. Rodríguez, MD,MPH;
Elizabeth McLoughlin, ScD;
Gregory Nah, MS;
Jacquelyn C. Campbell, PhD,RN,FAAN
JAMA. 2001;286:580-583.
Context Laws requiring mandatory reporting of domestic violence to police exist in 4 states. Controversy exists about the risks and benefits of such laws.
Objective To examine attitudes of female emergency department patients toward mandatory reporting of domestic violence injuries to police and how these attitudes may differ by abuse status.
Design, Setting, and Participants Cross-sectional survey conducted in 1996 of 1218 women patients (72.8% response rate) in 12 emergency departments in California (a state with a mandatory reporting law) and Pennsylvania (without such a law).
Main Outcome Measures Opposition to mandatory reporting to police and the characteristics associated with this belief.
Results Twelve percent of respondents (n = 140) reported physical or sexual abuse within the past year by a current or former partner. Of abused women, 55.7% supported mandatory reporting and 44.3% opposed mandatory reporting (7.9% preferred that physicians never report abuse to police and 36.4% preferred physicians report only with patient consent). Among nonabused women, 70.7% (n = 728) supported mandatory reporting and 29.3% opposed mandatory reporting. Patients currently seeing/living with partners (odds ratio [OR], 1.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1-2.0), non-English speakers (OR, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.4-3.0), and those who had experienced physical or sexual abuse within the last year (OR, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.6-2.9) had higher odds of opposing mandatory reporting of domestic violence injuries. There were no differences in attitudes by location (California vs Pennsylvania).
Conclusions The efficacy of mandatory reporting of domestic violence to police should be further assessed, and policymakers should consider options that include consent of patients before wider implementation.
Author Affiliations: Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of California, San Francisco (Dr Rodríguez); Trauma Foundation (Dr McLoughlin and Mr Nah), and The Johns Hopkins University School of Nursing (Dr Campbell) Baltimore, Md.
 CiteULike  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati  Twitter
What's this?
RELATED ARTICLE
August 1, 2001
JAMA. 2001;286(5):611-612.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
|
Factors influencing attitudes towards medical confidentiality among Swiss physicians
Elger
J. Med. Ethics 2009;35:517-524.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Interactions Between Victims of Intimate Partner Violence Against Women and the Health Care System: Policy and Practice Implications
Plichta
Trauma Violence Abuse 2007;8:226-239.
ABSTRACT
Abusive Partners and Ex-Partners: Understanding the Effects of Relationship to the Abuser on Women's Well-Being
Theran et al.
Violence Against Women 2006;12:950-969.
ABSTRACT
Survivors' Opinions About Mandatory Reporting of Domestic Violence and Sexual Assault by Medical Professionals
Sullivan and Hagen
Affilia 2005;20:346-361.
ABSTRACT
Risk Factors for Femicide in Abusive Relationships: Results From a Multisite Case Control Study
Campbell et al.
AJPH 2003;93:1089-1097.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
African American HMO Enrollees: Their Experiences with Partner Abuse and its Effect on their Health and Use of Medical Services
Schollenberger et al.
Violence Against Women 2003;9:599-618.
ABSTRACT
Improving Intimate Partner Violence Protocols for Emergency Departments: An Assessment Tool and Findings
Dodge et al.
Violence Against Women 2002;8:320-338.
ABSTRACT
Women's Attitudes on Mandatory Reporting of Domestic Violence
JWatch Emergency Med. 2001;2001:10-10.
FULL TEXT
|
