This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on Web of Science (4)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Related article  • Similar articles in JAMA  Topic Collections  • Medical Practice  • Medical Education  • Primary Care/ Family Medicine  • Alert me on articles by topic  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

David P. Stevens, MD; Gloria J. Holland, PhD; Kenneth W. Kizer, MD, MPH

JAMA. 2001;286:1061-1066.

Context  Planning for the US physician workforce is imprecise. Prevailing policy generally advocates more training in primary care specialties.

Objective  To describe a program to increase primary care graduate medical education (GME) in a large academic health system—the Veterans Health Administration of the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA).

Design  In 1995, a VA advisory panel recommended a 3-year plan to eliminate 1000 specialist training positions and add 750 primary care positions. After assessing the impact of the first year of these changes on patient care, the VA implemented modifications aimed at introducing primary care curricula for training of internal medicine subspecialists, neurologists, and psychiatrists. The change in strategy was in response to the call for better alignment of GME with local patient care and training needs to provide coordinated, continuous care for seriously and chronically ill patients.

Setting  The VA health system, including 172 hospitals, 773 ambulatory and community-based clinics, 206 counseling centers, and 132 nursing homes.

Participants  A total of 8900 VA residency training positions affiliated with 107 medical schools.

Main Outcome Measure  Proportion of residents in primary care training during the 3-year alignment.

Results  Over 3 years, primary care training in the VA increased from 38% to 48% of funded positions. Of this total, 39% of the increase was in internal medicine subspecialties, neurology, and psychiatry.

Conclusion  In this case study of GME realignment, national policy was driven more by local patient care issues than by a perceived national need for primary care or specialty positions.

Author Affiliations: Office of Academic Affiliations (Drs Stevens and Holland) and the Office of the Under Secretary (Dr Kizer), Veterans Health Administration, Department of Veterans Affairs, Washington, DC. Dr Stevens is now with the Association of American Medical Colleges, Washington, DC, and Dr Kizer is now with the National Quality Forum, Washington, DC.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

September 5, 2001
JAMA. 2001;286(9):1109-1110.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Collaborative Academic Training of Psychiatrists and Psychologists in VA and Medical School Settings
Scaturo and Huszonek
Acad. Psychiatry 2009;33:4-12.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Medical Student Psychiatry Examination Performance at VA and Non-VA Clerkship Sites
Tucker et al.
Acad. Psychiatry 2009;33:23-26.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT