You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 287 No. 20, May 22, 2002 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Original Contribution
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (61)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Immunization
 •Obesity
 •Substance Abuse/ Alcoholism
 •Gastrointestinal Diseases
 •Gynecology
 •Lipids and Lipid Disorders
 •Oncology
 •Cervical Cancer
 •Colon Cancer
 •Mammography
 •Alert me on articles by topic

State Trends in Health Risk Factors and Receipt of Clinical Preventive Services Among US Adults During the 1990s

David E. Nelson, MD,MPH; Shayne Bland, MS; Eve Powell-Griner, PhD; Richard Klein, MPH; Henry E. Wells, MS; Gary Hogelin, MPH,MPA; James S. Marks, MD,MPH

JAMA. 2002;287:2659-2667.

Context  Monitoring trends is essential for evaluating past activities and guiding current preventive health program and policy efforts. Although tracking progress toward national health goals is helpful, use of national estimates is limited because most preventive health care activities, policies, and other efforts occur at the state or community level. There may be important state trends that are obscured by national data.

Objective  To estimate state-specific trends for 5 health risk factors and 6 clinical preventive services.

Design  Telephone surveys were conducted from 1991 through 2000 as part of the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System.

Setting and Participants  Randomly selected adults aged 18 years or older from 49 US states. Annual state sample sizes ranged from 1188 to 7543.

Main Outcome Measures  Statistically significant changes (P<.01) in state prevalences of cigarette smoking, binge alcohol use, physical inactivity, obesity, safety belt use, and mammography; screening for cervical cancer, colorectal cancer, and cholesterol levels; and receipt of influenza and pneumococcal disease vaccination.

Results  There were statistically significant increases in safety belt use for 39 of 47 states and receipt of mammography in the past 2 years for women aged 40 years or older for 43 of 47 states. For persons aged 65 years or older, there were increases in receipt of influenza vaccination for 44 of 49 states and ever receiving pneumococcal vaccination for 48 of 49 states. State trends were mixed for binge alcohol use (increasing in 19 of 47 states and declining in 3), physical inactivity (increasing in 3 of 48 states and declining in 11), and cholesterol screening (increasing in 13 of 47 states and decreasing in 5). Obesity increased in all states and smoking increased in 14 of 47 states (declining only in Minnesota). Cervical cancer screening increased in 8 of 48 states and colorectal cancer screening increased in 13 of 49 states. New York experienced improvements for 8 of 11 measures, while 7 of 11 measures improved in Delaware, Kentucky, and Maryland; in contrast, Alaska experienced improvements for no measures and at least 4 of 11 measures worsened in Iowa, North Dakota, and South Dakota.

Conclusions  Most states experienced increases in safety belt use, mammography, and adult vaccinations. Trends for smoking and binge alcohol use are disturbing, and obesity data support previous findings. Trend data are useful for targeting state preventive health efforts.


Author Affiliations: National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Ga (Drs Nelson, Powell-Griner, and Marks and Messrs Bland and Hogelin); National Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville, Md (Mr Klein); and Research Triangle Institute, Research Triangle Park, NC (Mr Wells). Dr Nelson is now with the Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Md.
Mr Bland died March 20, 2002.


RELATED ARTICLES

Health in America—The Sum of Its Parts
J. Michael McGinnis
JAMA. 2002;287(20):2711-2712.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

May 22/29, 2002
JAMA. 2002;287(20):2723-2724.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Reducing Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Female Breast Cancer: Screening Rates and Stage at Diagnosis
Sassi et al.
Am. J. Public Health 2006;96:2165-2172.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Survival in colorectal cancer: impact of body mass and exercise
Hall
Gut 2006;55:8-10.
FULL TEXT  

Weight Gain Trends Across Sociodemographic Groups in the United States
Truong and Sturm
Am. J. Public Health 2005;95:1602-1606.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

RECENT TRENDS IN INCIDENCE RATES FOR SELECTED ALCOHOL-RELATED CANCERS IN THE UNITED STATES
POLEDNAK
Alcohol Alcohol 2005;40:234-238.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Diet-Induced Weight Loss Is Associated with Decreases in Plasma Serum Amyloid A and C-Reactive Protein Independent of Dietary Macronutrient Composition in Obese Subjects
O'Brien et al.
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2005;90:2244-2249.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Geographic Patterns of Prostate Cancer Mortality and Variations in Access to Medical Care in the United States
Jemal et al.
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 2005;14:590-595.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Smoking and asthma in adults
Piipari et al.
Eur Respir J 2004;24:734-739.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Association Between Obesity and Screening Mammography Accuracy
Elmore et al.
Arch Intern Med 2004;164:1140-1147.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Relationship between Health Status and Use of Screening Mammography and Papanicolaou Smears among Women Older Than 70 Years of Age
Walter et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2004;140:681-688.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Public's Enthusiasm for Cancer Screening--Reply
Woloshin et al.
JAMA 2004;291:1836-1836.
FULL TEXT  

Metropolitan-Area Estimates of Binge Drinking in the United States
Nelson et al.
Am. J. Public Health 2004;94:663-671.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Trends in Self-reported Multiple Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors Among Adults in the United States, 1991-1999
Greenlund et al.
Arch Intern Med 2004;164:181-188.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Increases in Clinically Severe Obesity in the United States, 1986-2000
Sturm
Arch Intern Med 2003;163:2146-2148.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Annual Report to the Nation on the Status of Cancer, 1975-2000, Featuring the Uses of Surveillance Data for Cancer Prevention and Control
Weir et al.
JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst 2003;95:1276-1299.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Diet and Breast Cancer: Evidence That Extremes in Diet Are Associated With Poor Survival
Goodwin et al.
JCO 2003;21:2500-2507.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Quality of Health Care Delivered to Adults in the United States
McGlynn et al.
NEJM 2003;348:2635-2645.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Role of State Health Agencies in Cancer Prevention and Control: Lessons Learned from Massachusetts
Koh and Walker
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 2003;12:261S-268.
FULL TEXT  

Binge Drinking Among US Adults
Naimi et al.
JAMA 2003;289:70-75.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

State Mandates for Preventive Health Services
Bondi and Atkins
JAMA 2002;288:1233-1233.
FULL TEXT  

Health in America--The Sum of Its Parts
McGinnis
JAMA 2002;287:2711-2712.
FULL TEXT  

Patient Smoking Cessation Advice by Health Care Providers: The Role of Ethnicity, Socioeconomic Status, and Health
Houston et al.
Am. J. Public Health 2005;95:1056-1061.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2002 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.