This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on ISI (59)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in JAMA

What Can Journals Do?

Douglas G. Altman, DSc

JAMA. 2002;287:2765-2767.

The aim of medical research is to advance scientific knowledge and hence—directly or indirectly—lead to improvements in the treatment and prevention of disease. Each research project should continue systematically from previous research and feed into future research. Each project should contribute beneficially to a slowly evolving body of research. A study should not mislead; otherwise it could adversely affect clinical practice and future research. In 1994 I observed that research papers commonly contain methodological errors, report results selectively, and draw unjustified conclusions. Here I revisit the topic and suggest how journal editors can help.

Author Affiliation: Cancer Research UK/NHS Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Oxford, England.

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

On improving research methodology in clinical trials
Berger et al.
Stat Methods Med Res 2008;17:231-242.
ABSTRACT  

Publication bias in the medical literature: a review by a Canadian Research Ethics Board: [Biais de publication dans la litterature medicale : un compte rendu d'un Comite d'ethique de recherche canadien]
Hall et al.
Canadian J. Anesthesia 2007;54:380-388.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Who Reviews the Reviewers?
Bidstrup
Asian Cardiovasc. Thorac. Ann. 2006;14:357-358.
FULL TEXT  

How Evidence-Based Are Publications in Clinical Ophthalmic Journals?
Lai et al.
IOVS 2006;47:1831-1838.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Enoxaparin in the Treatment of Deep Vein Thrombosis With or Without Pulmonary Embolism: An Individual Patient Data Meta-analysis
Mismetti et al.
Chest 2005;128:2203-2210.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Randomized Phase II Designs in Cancer Clinical Trials: Current Status and Future Directions
Lee and Feng
JCO 2005;23:4450-4457.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Revitalising rapid responses
Davies and Delamothe
BMJ 2005;330:1284-1284.
FULL TEXT  

Reply to Susanne MacGregor's Response, `We did not Simply Mimic Received Opinion'
Gambrill
Journal of Social Work 2003;3:253-256.
ABSTRACT  

New edicts for letters
Altman et al.
BMJ 2003;326:985-985.
FULL TEXT  

Our editorial process - some experiences and reflections
Emmelin and Wall
Scand J Public Health 2003;31:161-168.
 

Quality of impact factors of general medical journals
Porta and Liu
BMJ 2003;326:931-931.
FULL TEXT  

How I Review an Original Scientific Article
Hoppin
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2002;166:1019-1023.
FULL TEXT  

The "CONSORT" Guidelines for Randomized Controlled Trials in Obstetrics & Gynecology
Grimes
Obstet Gynecol 2002;100:631-632.
FULL TEXT  

Making Reviewers Visible: Openness, Accountability, and Credit
Godlee
JAMA 2002;287:2762-2765.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT