 |
|
Association of Journal Quality Indicators With Methodological Quality of Clinical Research Articles
Kirby P. Lee, MA;
Marieka Schotland, BA;
Peter Bacchetti, PhD;
Lisa A. Bero, PhD
JAMA. 2002;287:2805-2808.
Context The ability to identify scientific journals that publish high-quality research would help clinicians, scientists, and health-policy analysts to select the most up-to-date medical literature to review.
Methods To assess whether journal characteristics of (1) peer-review status, (2) citation rate, (3) impact factor, (4) circulation, (5) manuscript acceptance rate, (6) MEDLINE indexing, and (7) Brandon/Hill Library List indexing are predictors of methodological quality of research articles, we conducted a cross-sectional study of 243 original research articles involving human subjects published in general internal medical journals.
Results The mean (SD) quality score of the 243 articles was 1.37 (0.22). All journals reported a peer-review process and were indexed on MEDLINE. In models that controlled for article type (randomized controlled trial [RCT] or non-RCT), journal citation rate was the most statistically significant predictor (0.051 increase per doubling; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.037-0.065; P<.001). In separate analyses by article type, acceptance rate was the strongest predictor for RCT quality (-0.113 per doubling; 95% CI, –0.148 to –0.078; P<.001), while journal citation rate was the most predictive factor for non-RCT quality (0.051 per doubling; 95% CI, 0.044-0.059; P<.001).
Conclusions High citation rates, impact factors, and circulation rates, and low manuscript acceptance rates and indexing on Brandon/Hill Library List appear to be predictive of higher methodological quality scores for journal articles.
Author Affiliations: Institute for Health Policy Studies, School of Medicine and Department of Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy (Mr Lee, Ms Schotland, and Dr Bero), and Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (Dr Bacchetti), University of California, San Francisco. Ms Schotland is now with the Department of Psychology, New York University, New York.
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
|
Prediction of citation counts for clinical articles at two years using data available within three weeks of publication: retrospective cohort study
Lokker et al.
BMJ 2008;336:655-657.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Measuring the impact of family medicine research: scientific citations or societal impact?
van Driel et al.
Fam Pract 2007;24:401-402.
FULL TEXT
Association Between Funding and Quality of Published Medical Education Research
Reed et al.
JAMA 2007;298:1002-1009.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Reporting of radiographic methods in randomised controlled trials assessing structural outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis
Baron et al.
Ann Rheum Dis 2007;66:651-657.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Fair assessment of the merits of psychiatric research
LEWISON et al.
Br. J. Psychiatry 2007;190:314-318.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Measuring the Impact of Medical Research: Moving From Outputs to Outcomes
Weiss
Am. J. Psychiatry 2007;164:206-214.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Reporting of Harm in Randomized, Controlled Trials of Nonpharmacologic Treatment for Rheumatic Disease
Ethgen et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2005;143:20-25.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Quality of Reporting of Observational Longitudinal Research
Tooth et al.
Am J Epidemiol 2005;161:280-288.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Publication Bias Against Eating Disorders?
MENDLOWICZ et al.
Am. J. Psychiatry 2004;161:2327-2327.
FULL TEXT
Issues in the reporting of epidemiological studies: a survey of recent practice
Pocock et al.
BMJ 2004;329:883.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Relation between online "hit counts" and subsequent citations: prospective study of research papers in the BMJ
Perneger
BMJ 2004;329:546-547.
FULL TEXT
An Examination of Leading Mental Health Journals for Evidence to Inform Evidence-Based Practice
Shumway and Sentell
Psychiatr. Serv. 2004;55:649-653.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Doubling the Impact: Publication of Systematic Review Articles in Orthopaedic Journals
Bhandari et al.
JBJS 2004;86:1012-1016.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Impact Factor and the Journal
Tobin
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2003;168:621-622.
FULL TEXT
Methodological Differences in Clinical Trials Evaluating Nonpharmacological and Pharmacological Treatments of Hip and Knee Osteoarthritis
Boutron et al.
JAMA 2003;290:1062-1070.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Does declaration of competing interests affect readers' perceptions? A randomised trial
Chaudhry et al.
BMJ 2002;325:1391-1392.
FULL TEXT
|
