 |
|
Quality of Systematic Reviews of Economic Evaluations in Health Care
Tom Jefferson, MD;
Vittorio Demicheli, MD;
Luke Vale, MSc
JAMA. 2002;287:2809-2812.
Context Reviews performed almost a decade ago showed considerable gaps in the quality of reporting and methods applied to economic evaluations of health care interventions. Measures taken by the research community to address the issue included the promulgation of guidelines and the publicizing of good practice in economic evaluation.
Methods To assess the quality of methods of systematic reviews, economic evaluations in health care, and reporting methods, we conducted full-text searches of private and public databases for the period 1990 through March 2001 and corresponded with researchers active in the field. A total of 102 reports were identified, but only 39 were included. Quality of systematic reviews was assessed by a 6-item checklist.
Results Quality of review methods was reasonable, but more attention needs to be paid to search methods and standardization of evaluation instruments. The reviews found consistent evidence of serious methodological flaws in a significant number of economic evaluations. Lack of clear descriptions of methods, lack of explanation and justification for the framework and approach used, and low-quality estimates of effectiveness for the interventions evaluated were the most frequent flaws. Modest improvements in quality of conducting and reporting economic evaluations appear to have taken place in the last decade.
Conclusions Proper allocation of resources on the basis of economic evaluations remains uncertain. Editorial teams and regulatory bodies should perform quality assurance based on a single widely accepted and validated standard instrument.
Author Affiliations: Cochrane Health Economics Methods Group, Rome, Italy (Drs Jefferson and Demicheli, and Mr Vale); Health Reviews Ltd, Rome, Italy (Dr Jefferson); Azienda Sanitaria Locale 20, Alessandria, Italy (Dr Demicheli); and Health Services Research Unit and Health Economics Research Unit, Aberdeen, Scotland (Mr Vale).
RELATED LETTERS
Educating Authors and Reviewers of Economic Evaluations of Health Care
Afschin Gandjour, Tom Jefferson, Vittorio Demicheli, and Luke Vale
JAMA. 2002;288(8):959.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Family Medicine Training in Rural Areas
Roger A. Rosenblatt, Ronald Schneeweiss, L. Gary Hart, Susan Casey, C. Holly A. Andrilla, and Frederick M. Chen
JAMA. 2002;288(9):1063-1064.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
|
The use of cost-effectiveness by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE): no(t yet an) exemplar of a deliberative process
Schlander
J. Med. Ethics 2008;34:534-539.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Bufale Spotting, part 9: assessing an economic evaluation
Jefferson and Zarra
JRSM 2008;101:175-176.
FULL TEXT
Economic evaluations of single- versus double-embryo transfer in IVF
Fiddelers et al.
Hum Reprod Update 2007;13:5-13.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Author's response to influenza vaccination: policy v evidence
Jefferson
BMJ 2006;333:1172-1172.
FULL TEXT
Challenges in Systematic Reviews of Economic Analyses
Pignone et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2005;142:1073-1079.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Economic Analysis of Influenza Vaccination and Treatment
Jefferson and Demicheli
ANN INTERN MED 2003;138:607-607.
FULL TEXT
Educating Authors and Reviewers of Economic Evaluations of Health Care
Gandjour et al.
JAMA 2002;288:959-959.
FULL TEXT
|
