You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 287 No. 21, June 5, 2002 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Quality Issues and Standards
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (35)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related letter
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Reporting Number Needed to Treat and Absolute Risk Reduction in Randomized Controlled Trials

Jim Nuovo, MD; Joy Melnikow, MD,MPH; Denise Chang, BA

JAMA. 2002;287:2813-2814.

Context  Ongoing efforts to improve the quality of reporting for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) include the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) statement. We examined the frequency of explicit reporting of the number needed to treat (NNT) and the absolute risk reduction (ARR) in RCTs.

Methods  Five frequently cited journals were investigated: Annals of Internal Medicine, BMJ, JAMA, The Lancet, and the New England Journal of Medicine. For each journal, 4 years were evaluated: 1989, 1992, 1995, and 1998. All issues of each journal for each year were reviewed manually. Eligible articles were those in which an RCT was conducted on the use of a medication showing a significant treatment effect. Elements abstracted from each eligible article were the condition investigated, event being treated or prevented, intervention, study results, and reporting methods (relative risk reduction, NNT, and ARR).

Results  Of 359 eligible articles, NNT was reported in 8 articles. Six of the 8 studies were from 1998. Absolute risk reduction was reported in 18 articles, 10 of which were from 1998.

Conclusions  Despite CONSORT recommendations, few authors expressed their findings in terms of NNT or ARR. Consideration should be given to including these values in reports of RCTs.


Author Affiliations: Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of California, Davis.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED LETTER

Interpreting the Number Needed to Treat
Lambert A. Wu, Thomas E. Kottke, Kenneth F. Schulz, David Moher, Douglas G. Altman, and James Nuovo
JAMA. 2002;288(7):830-832.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Rethinking Health Numeracy: A Multidisciplinary Literature Review
Ancker and Kaufman
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 2007;14:713-721.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Evaluating the Quality of Trials of Hypothermic Circulatory Arrest Aortic Surgery
Shuhaiber
Asian Cardiovasc. Thorac. Ann. 2007;15:449-452.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Numeric, Verbal, and Visual Formats of Conveying Health Risks: Suggested Best Practices and Future Recommendations
Lipkus
Med Decis Making 2007;27:696-713.
ABSTRACT  

A Meta-analysis of the Effects of Presenting Treatment Benefits in Different Formats
Covey
Med Decis Making 2007;27:638-654.
ABSTRACT  

Design Features of Graphs in Health Risk Communication: A Systematic Review
Ancker et al.
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 2006;13:608-618.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Promoting Informed Choice: Transforming Health Care To Dispense Knowledge for Decision Making
Woolf et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2005;143:293-300.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Adding Value to Evidence-Based Clinical Guidelines
O'Connor
JAMA 2005;294:741-743.
FULL TEXT  

The exaggerated relations between diet, body weight and mortality: the case for a categorical data approach
Welch et al.
CMAJ 2005;172:891-895.
FULL TEXT  

Interpretation of Drug Risk and Benefit: Individual and Population Perspectives
Bjornson
The Annals of Pharmacotherapy 2004;38:694-699.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Anti-proteinuric effect of losartan: statistical vs clinical significance
Ghosh and Ghosh
Nephrol Dial Transplant 2004;19:747-747.
FULL TEXT  

Psychopharmacology: Number Needed to Treat: An Underused Measure of Treatment Effect
Pinson and Gray
Psychiatr. Serv. 2003;54:145-154.
FULL TEXT  

Interpreting the Number Needed to Treat
Wu et al.
JAMA 2002;288:830-832.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2002 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.