 |
 |

Reporting Number Needed to Treat and Absolute Risk Reduction in Randomized Controlled Trials
Jim Nuovo, MD;
Joy Melnikow, MD,MPH;
Denise Chang, BA
JAMA. 2002;287:2813-2814.
Context Ongoing efforts to improve the quality of reporting for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) include the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) statement. We examined the frequency of explicit reporting of the number needed to treat (NNT) and the absolute risk reduction (ARR) in RCTs.
Methods Five frequently cited journals were investigated: Annals of Internal Medicine, BMJ, JAMA, The Lancet, and the New England Journal of Medicine. For each journal, 4 years were evaluated: 1989, 1992, 1995, and 1998. All issues of each journal for each year were reviewed manually. Eligible articles were those in which an RCT was conducted on the use of a medication showing a significant treatment effect. Elements abstracted from each eligible article were the condition investigated, event being treated or prevented, intervention, study results, and reporting methods (relative risk reduction, NNT, and ARR).
Results Of 359 eligible articles, NNT was reported in 8 articles. Six of the 8 studies were from 1998. Absolute risk reduction was reported in 18 articles, 10 of which were from 1998.
Conclusions Despite CONSORT recommendations, few authors expressed their findings in terms of NNT or ARR. Consideration should be given to including these values in reports of RCTs.
Author Affiliations: Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of California, Davis.
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
RELATED LETTER
Interpreting the Number Needed to Treat
Lambert A. Wu, Thomas E. Kottke, Kenneth F. Schulz, David Moher, Douglas G. Altman, and James Nuovo
JAMA. 2002;288(7):830-832.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
 |
Rethinking Health Numeracy: A Multidisciplinary Literature Review
Ancker and Kaufman
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 2007;14:713-721.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Evaluating the Quality of Trials of Hypothermic Circulatory Arrest Aortic Surgery
Shuhaiber
Asian Cardiovasc. Thorac. Ann. 2007;15:449-452.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Numeric, Verbal, and Visual Formats of Conveying Health Risks: Suggested Best Practices and Future Recommendations
Lipkus
Med Decis Making 2007;27:696-713.
ABSTRACT
A Meta-analysis of the Effects of Presenting Treatment Benefits in Different Formats
Covey
Med Decis Making 2007;27:638-654.
ABSTRACT
Design Features of Graphs in Health Risk Communication: A Systematic Review
Ancker et al.
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 2006;13:608-618.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Promoting Informed Choice: Transforming Health Care To Dispense Knowledge for Decision Making
Woolf et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2005;143:293-300.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Adding Value to Evidence-Based Clinical Guidelines
O'Connor
JAMA 2005;294:741-743.
FULL TEXT
The exaggerated relations between diet, body weight and mortality: the case for a categorical data approach
Welch et al.
CMAJ 2005;172:891-895.
FULL TEXT
Interpretation of Drug Risk and Benefit: Individual and Population Perspectives
Bjornson
The Annals of Pharmacotherapy 2004;38:694-699.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Anti-proteinuric effect of losartan: statistical vs clinical significance
Ghosh and Ghosh
Nephrol Dial Transplant 2004;19:747-747.
FULL TEXT
Psychopharmacology: Number Needed to Treat: An Underused Measure of Treatment Effect
Pinson and Gray
Psychiatr. Serv. 2003;54:145-154.
FULL TEXT
Interpreting the Number Needed to Treat
Wu et al.
JAMA 2002;288:830-832.
FULL TEXT
|