 |
 |

Publication Bias in Editorial Decision Making
Carin M. Olson, MD;
Drummond Rennie, MD;
Deborah Cook, MD,MSc,FRCPC;
Kay Dickersin, PhD;
Annette Flanagin, RN,MA;
Joseph W. Hogan, ScD;
Qi Zhu, MS;
Jennifer Reiling;
Brian Pace, MA
JAMA. 2002;287:2825-2828.
Context Studies with positive results are more likely to be published than studies with negative results (publication bias). One reason this occurs is that authors are less likely to submit manuscripts reporting negative results to journals. There is no evidence that publication bias occurs once manuscripts have been submitted to a medical journal. We assessed whether submitted manuscripts that report results of controlled trials are more likely to be published if they report positive results.
Methods Prospective cohort study of manuscripts submitted to JAMA from February 1996 through August 1999. We classified results as positive if there was a statistically significant difference (P<.05) reported for the primary outcome. Study characteristics and indicators for quality were also appraised. We included manuscripts that reported prospective studies in which participants were assigned to an intervention or comparison group and statistical tests compared differences between groups.
Results Among 745 manuscripts, 133 (17.9%) were published: 78 (20.4%) of 383 with positive results, 51 (15.0%) of 341 with negative results, and 4 (19.0%) of 21 with unclear results. The crude relative risk for publication of studies with positive results compared with negative results was 1.36 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.99-1.88). After being adjusted simultaneously for study characteristics and quality indicators, the odds ratio for publishing studies with positive results was 1.30 (95% CI, 0.87-1.96).
Conclusions Among submitted manuscripts, we did not find a statistically significant difference in publication rates between those with positive vs negative results.
Author Affiliations: JAMA, Chicago, Ill (Drs Olson, Rennie, and Cook, Mss Flanagin and Reiling, and Mr Pace); Department of Medicine, Division of Emergency Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle (Dr Olson); Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California, San Francisco (Dr Rennie); Departments of Medicine, Clinical Epidemiology, and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario (Dr Cook); and Department of Community Health (Drs Dickersin and Hogan and Ms Zhu) and Center for Statistical Sciences (Dr Hogan), Brown University, Providence, RI.
RELATED LETTERS
Idiopathic vs Hereditary Pancreatitis
F. Ulrich Weiss, Peter Simon, Carsten Hohoff, Klaus Peter Zimmer, Wolfram Domschke, and Markus M. Lerch
JAMA. 2003;289(8):985.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Registering Clinical TrialsReply
Kay Dickersin and Drummond Rennie
JAMA. 2003;290(19):2546.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
RELATED ARTICLE
June 5, 2002
JAMA. 2002;287(21):2875-2876.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
 |
Publication bias in qualitative research: what becomes of qualitative research presented at conferences?
Petticrew et al.
J. Epidemiol. Community Health 2008;62:552-554.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Publication Bias in Orthopaedic Research: An Analysis of Scientific Factors Associated with Publication in The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American Volume)
Okike et al.
JBJS 2008;90:595-601.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Reducing Publication Bias Through Trial Registration
Abaid et al.
Obstet Gynecol 2007;109:1434-1437.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Ethical Considerations in the Interpretation and Communication of Clinical Trial Results
Coultas
Proc Am Thorac Soc 2007;4:194-199.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
A Viewpoint on Evidence-based Health Informatics, Based on a Pilot Survey on Evaluation Studies in Health Care Informatics
Ammenwerth and de Keizer
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 2007;14:368-371.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Statistical and Clinical Interpretation of Research Results
Allison
J. Am. Podiatr. Med. Assoc. 2007;97:165-170.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Peer-reviewed publication of clinical trials completed for pediatric exclusivity.
Benjamin et al.
JAMA 2006;296:1266-1273.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Posttraumatic Stress in Youth Experiencing Illnesses and Injuries: An Exploratory Meta-Analysis
Kahana et al.
Traumatology 2006;12:148-161.
ABSTRACT
Effect of Blinded Peer Review on Abstract Acceptance
Ross et al.
JAMA 2006;295:1675-1680.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Bias in published cost effectiveness studies: systematic review
Bell et al.
BMJ 2006;332:699-703.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Bias in Clinical Intervention Research
Gluud
Am J Epidemiol 2006;163:493-501.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Sufficiency and Stability of Evidence for Public Health Interventions Using Cumulative Meta-Analysis
Muellerleile and Mullen
Am. J. Public Health 2006;96:515-522.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Peer Review and Professionalism at the Archives of Internal Medicine
Emanuel and Greenland
Arch Intern Med 2005;165:2559-2560.
FULL TEXT
The Accuracy of Diagnostic Imaging for the Assessment of Chronic Osteomyelitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Termaat et al.
JBJS 2005;87:2464-2471.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Negative Results and Impact Factor: A Lesson From Neonatology
Littner et al.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2005;159:1036-1037.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Recent Developments in Health Law
J Law Med Ethics 2005;33:384-403.
Acute Endophthalmitis Following Cataract Surgery: A Systematic Review of the Literature
Taban et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 2005;123:613-620.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Interaction Between an 11{beta}HSD1 Gene Variant and Birth Era Modifies the Risk of Hypertension in Pima Indians
Franks et al.
Hypertension 2004;44:681-688.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Factors Influencing the Publication of Randomized Controlled Trials in Child Health Research
Hartling et al.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2004;158:983-987.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
High-Dose Statins in Acute Coronary Syndromes: Not Just Lipid Levels
Nissen
JAMA 2004;292:1365-1367.
FULL TEXT
A Low, Rather than a High, Total Plasma Homocysteine Is an Indicator of Poor Outcome in Hemodialysis Patients
Kalantar-Zadeh et al.
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2004;15:442-453.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Registering Clinical Trials--Reply
Dickersin and Rennie
JAMA 2003;290:2546-2546.
FULL TEXT
Idiopathic vs Hereditary Pancreatitis
Weiss et al.
JAMA 2003;289:985-985.
FULL TEXT
Association Between Time Interval to Publication and Statistical Significance
Dickersin et al.
JAMA 2002;287:2829-2831.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|