 |
|
Comparison of Review Articles Published in Peer-Reviewed and Throwaway Journals
Paula A. Rochon, MD,MPH;
Lisa A. Bero, PhD;
Ari M. Bay, BSc;
Jennifer L. Gold, BSc;
Julie M. Dergal, MSc;
Malcolm A. Binns, MSc;
David L. Streiner, PhD;
Jerry H. Gurwitz, MD
JAMA. 2002;287:2853-2856.
Context To compare the quality, presentation, readability, and clinical relevance of review articles published in peer-reviewed and "throwaway" journals.
Methods We reviewed articles that focused on the diagnosis or treatment of a medical condition published between January 1 and December 31, 1998, in the 5 leading peer-reviewed general medical journals and high-circulation throwaway journals. Reviewers independently assessed the methodologic and reporting quality, and evaluated each article's presentation and readability. Clinical relevance was evaluated independently by 6 physicians.
Results Of the 394 articles in our sample, 16 (4.1%) were peer-reviewed systematic reviews, 135 (34.3%) were peer-reviewed nonsystematic reviews, and 243 (61.7%) were nonsystematic reviews published in throwaway journals. The mean (SD) quality scores were highest for peer-reviewed articles (0.94 [0.09] for systematic reviews and 0.30 [0.19] for nonsystematic reviews) compared with throwaway journal articles (0.23 [0.03], F2,391 = 280.8, P<.001). Throwaway journal articles used more tables (P = .02), figures (P = .01), photographs (P<.001), color (P<.001), and larger font sizes (P<.001) compared with peer-reviewed articles. Readability scores were more often in the college or higher range for peer-reviewed journals compared with the throwaway journal articles (104 [77.0%] vs 156 [64.2%]; P = .01). Peer-reviewed article titles were judged less relevant to clinical practice than throwaway journal article titles (P<.001).
Conclusions Although lower in methodologic and reporting quality, review articles published in throwaway journals have characteristics that appeal to physician readers.
Author Affiliations: Kunin-Lunenfeld Applied Research Unit (Drs Rochon and Streiner, Mr Bay, and Mss Gold and Dergal) and Rotman Research Institute (Mr Binns), Baycrest Centre for Geriatric Care, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto and Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (Dr Rochon), Toronto, Ontario; Department of Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, and Institute for Health Policy Studies, School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco (Dr Bero); Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario (Dr Streiner); and Meyers Primary Care Institute, Fallon Healthcare System, and University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester (Dr Gurwitz).
RELATED ARTICLE
June 5, 2002
JAMA. 2002;287(21):2875-2876.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
|
Continuing Professional Development of Dental Practitioners in Prato, Italy
Nieri and Mauro
J Dent Educ 2008;72:616-625.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Patient-Care Questions that Physicians Are Unable to Answer
Ely et al.
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 2007;14:407-414.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
The Proliferation of Clinical Practice Guidelines: Professional Development or Medicine-by-Numbers?
Genuis
J Am Board Fam Med 2005;18:419-425.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
The Role of Tabloids in Ophthalmic Education: Pro
McDonnell
Arch Ophthalmol 2004;122:1379-1380.
FULL TEXT
The Role of Tabloids in Ophthalmic Education: Con
Frank
Arch Ophthalmol 2004;122:1380-1382.
FULL TEXT
Advantages and Potential Dangers of Presentation Before Publication: Third in a Series on Editorship
Bressler et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 2004;122:1045-1048.
FULL TEXT
Relation between randomized controlled trials published in leading general medical journals and the global burden of disease
Rochon et al.
CMAJ 2004;170:1673-1677.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
The Validity of Claims Made in Orthopaedic Print Advertisements
Bhattacharyya et al.
JBJS 2003;85:1224-1228.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Increasing the trust in scientific authorship
LAGNADO
Br. J. Psychiatry 2003;183:3-4.
FULL TEXT
Is academic psychiatry for sale?
Healy and Thase
Br. J. Psychiatry 2003;182:388-390.
FULL TEXT
Readability of British and American medical prose at the start of the 21st century
Weeks and Wallace
BMJ 2002;325:1451-1452.
FULL TEXT
|
