 |
|
Evaluation of Investigations Conducted to Detect and Prevent Transmission of Tuberculosis
Mary R. Reichler, MD;
Randall Reves, MD, MSc;
Sarah Bur, RN, MPH;
Virginia Thompson, RN;
Bonita T. Mangura, MD;
Josie Ford, RN;
Sarah E. Valway, DMD, MPH;
Ida M. Onorato, MD;
for the Contact Investigation Study Group
JAMA. 2002;287:991-995.
Context Contact investigations are routinely conducted by health departments throughout the United States for all cases of active pulmonary tuberculosis (TB) to identify secondary cases of active TB and latent TB infection and to initiate therapy as needed in these contacts. Little is known about the actual procedures followed, or the results.
Objectives To evaluate contact investigations conducted by US health departments and the outcomes of these investigations.
Design, Setting, and Subjects Review of health department records for all contacts of 349 patients with culture-positive pulmonary TB aged 15 years or older reported from 5 study areas in the United States during 1996.
Main Outcome Measures Number of contacts identified, fully screened, and infected per TB patient; rates of TB infection and disease among contacts of TB patients; and type and completeness of data collected during contact investigations.
Results A total of 3824 contacts were identified for 349 patients with active pulmonary TB. Of the TB patients, 45 (13%) had no contacts identified. Of the contacts, 55% completed screening, 27% had an initial but no postexposure tuberculin skin test, 12% were not screened, and 6% had a history of prior TB or prior positive tuberculin skin test. Of 2095 contacts who completed screening, 68% had negative skin test results, 24% had initial positive results with no prior test result available, 7% had documented skin test conversions, and 1% had active TB at the time of investigation. Close contacts younger than 15 years (76% screened vs 65% for older age groups; P<.001) or exposed to a TB patient with a positive smear (74% screened vs 59% for those with a negative smear; P<.001) were more likely to be fully screened. Close contacts exposed to TB patients with both a positive smear and a cavitary chest radiograph were more likely to have TB infection or disease (62% vs 33% for positive smear only vs 44% for cavitary radiograph only vs 37% for neither characteristic; P<.001). A number of factors associated with TB patient infectiousness, contact susceptibility to infection, contact risk of progression to active TB, and amount of contact exposure to the TB patient were not routinely recorded in health department records.
Conclusions Improvement is needed in the complex, multistep process of contact investigations to ensure that contacts of patients with active pulmonary TB are identified and appropriately screened.
Author Affiliations: Division of Tuberculosis Elimination, National Center for HIV, STD, and TB Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Ga (Drs Reichler, Valway, and Onorato); Denver Public Health, Denver, Colo (Dr Reves); the Maryland Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, Baltimore, (Ms Bur); Massachusetts Department of Public Health, Jamaica Plain (Ms Ford); Mississippi State Department of Health, Jackson (Ms Thompson); New Jersey Department of Health and Senior Services, Trenton, and New Jersey Medical School National Tuberculosis Center, Newark (Dr Mangura).
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
|
Unexpected Pulmonary Involvement in Extrapulmonary Tuberculosis Patients
Parimon et al.
Chest 2008;134:589-594.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Evaluation of a large-scale tuberculosis contact investigation in the Netherlands
Borgen et al.
Eur Respir J 2008;32:419-425.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Self-Reported Tuberculosis Disease and Tuberculin Skin Testing in the New York City House Ballroom Community
Marks et al.
Am. J. Public Health 2008;98:1068-1073.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Transmission Network Analysis to Complement Routine Tuberculosis Contact Investigations
Andre et al.
Am. J. Public Health 2007;97:470-477.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
What Is the Outcome of Targeted Tuberculosis Screening Based on Universal Genotyping and Location?
Moonan et al.
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2006;174:599-604.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
IMMUNE CORRELATES OF ACUTE MYCOBACTERIUM TUBERCULOSIS INFECTION IN HOUSEHOLD CONTACTS IN KAMPALA, UGANDA.
WHALEN et al.
Am J Trop Med Hyg 2006;75:55-61.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Pediatric Tuberculosis in North Carolina
Stout et al.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2006;160:631-637.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
American Thoracic Society/Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/Infectious Diseases Society of America: Controlling Tuberculosis in the United States
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2005;172:1169-1227.
FULL TEXT
Mexican Immigrants' Explanatory Model of Latent Tuberculosis Infection
McEwen
J Transcult Nurs 2005;16:347-355.
ABSTRACT
Number of Negative Acid-Fast Smears Needed To Adequately Assess Infectivity of Patients With Pulmonary Tuberculosis
Mixides et al.
Chest 2005;128:108-115.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Epidemiology of a Tuberculosis Outbreak in a Rural Missouri High School
Phillips et al.
Pediatrics 2004;113:e514-e519.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Tuberculosis Contact Investigations: Please Don't Fail Me Now
Daley
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2004;169:779-781.
FULL TEXT
Contact Investigations: How Do They Need to Be Designed for the 21st Century?
Weis
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2002;166:1016-1017.
FULL TEXT
Factors in Tuberculosis Contact Investigations
Reichler et al.
JAMA 2002;287:2944-2945.
FULL TEXT
Is TB Contact Investigation Effective? Can It Be Improved?
JWatch Infect. Diseases 2002;2002:14-14.
FULL TEXT
Contact Investigations and the Continued Commitment to Control Tuberculosis
Mohle-Boetani and Flood
JAMA 2002;287:1040-1042.
FULL TEXT
|
