You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 288 No. 18, November 13, 2002 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Original Contribution
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (18)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Aging/ Geriatrics
 •Medical Education
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Academic Geriatric Programs in US Allopathic and Osteopathic Medical Schools

Gregg A. Warshaw, MD; Elizabeth J. Bragg, PhD, RN; Ruth W. Shaull, MSN, RN; Christopher J. Lindsell, PhD

JAMA. 2002;288:2313-2319.

Context  By 2030, 20% of the US population will be older than 65 years compared with 12.4% in 2000. The development of geriatric medicine research and training programs to prepare for this increasing number of older individuals is largely dependent on the successful establishment of academic geriatric medicine programs in medical schools.

Objective  To assess the structure, resources, and activities of academic geriatric medicine programs in US allopathic and osteopathic schools of medicine.

Design, Setting, and Participants  Survey distributed to the academic geriatric medicine leaders of the 144 US allopathic and osteopathic medical schools in March 2001.

Main Outcome Measures  Organizational structure, program information, curriculum, budgetary issues, and characteristics of academic geriatric medicine leaders.

Results  A total of 121 program directors (84%) responded. Most schools (87%) had an identifiable academic geriatric program structure, with 67% established after 1984. The greatest proportion of faculty and staff time (40%) was spent in clinical practice, followed by research and scholarship (12%), residency and fellowship education (10% each), and medical student education (7.8%). Clinical practice accounted for the greatest portion (27%) of revenue, and 25.7% of the programs had total annual budgets of less than $250 000, while 11% had budgets of greater than $5 million. The largest obstacles to achieving the goals of an academic geriatric medicine program were a lack of research faculty and fellows and poor clinical reimbursement.

Conclusions  Most US medical schools have an identifiable academic geriatric medicine program; most have been established within the last 15 years. Resources are needed to train faculty for roles as teachers and researchers and to develop medical school geriatric programs of the size and scope equivalent to other academic disciplines.


Author Affiliations: Office of Geriatric Medicine and Department of Family Medicine (Dr Warshaw) and Institute for Health Policy and Health Services Research (Drs Bragg and Lindsell and Ms Shaull), University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio.



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Improving Health Care for Assisted Living Residents
Kane and Mach
Gerontologist 2007;47:100-109.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Undergraduate training in geriatric medicine: getting it right
Lally and Crome
Age Ageing 2007;36:366-368.
FULL TEXT  

Perceptions of Geriatric Medicine Junior Faculty on Success in Academic Medicine: The Saint Louis University Geriatric Academy (SLUGA) Faculty Development Program
Gammack et al.
J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 2004;59:M1029-M1035.
FULL TEXT  

General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics: Building a Foundation To Improve the Training of General Internists in the Care of Older Adults
Landefeld et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2003;139:609-614.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Improving the United States' System of Care for Older Adults With Mental Illness: Findings and Recommendations for The President's New Freedom Commission on Mental Health
Bartels
AJGP 2003;11:486-497.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Use It or Lose It: Activity May Be the Best Treatment for Aging
Cassel
JAMA 2002;288:2333-2335.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2002 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.