You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 288 No. 19, November 20, 2002 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Review
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (39)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Evidence-Based Medicine
 •Quality of Care, Other
 •Renal Diseases
 •Dialysis
 •Review
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Comparison of Mortality Between Private For-Profit and Private Not-For-Profit Hemodialysis Centers

A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

P. J. Devereaux, MD; Holger J. Schünemann, MD, PhD; Nikila Ravindran, BSc; Mohit Bhandari, MD, MSc; Amit X. Garg, MD; Peter T.-L. Choi, MD, MSc; Brydon J. B. Grant, MD; Ted Haines, MD; Christina Lacchetti, MHSc; Bruce Weaver, MSc; John N. Lavis, MD, PhD; Deborah J. Cook, MD, MSc; David R. S. Haslam, MD, MSc; Terrence Sullivan, PhD; Gordon H. Guyatt, MD, MSc

JAMA. 2002;288:2449-2457.

Context  Private for-profit and private not-for-profit dialysis facilities provide the majority of hemodialysis care in the United States. There has been extensive debate about whether the profit status of these facilities influences patient mortality.

Objective  To determine whether a difference in adjusted mortality rates exists between hemodialysis patients receiving care in private for-profit vs private not-for-profit dialysis centers.

Data Sources  We searched 11 bibliographic databases, reviewed our own files, and contacted experts in June 2001–January 2002. In June 2002, we also searched PubMed using the "related articles" feature, SciSearch, and the reference lists of all studies that fulfilled our eligibility criteria.

Study Selection  We included published and unpublished observational studies that directly compared the mortality rates of hemodialysis patients in private for-profit and private not-for-profit dialysis centers and provided adjusted mortality rates. We masked the study results prior to determining study eligibility, and teams of 2 reviewers independently evaluated the eligibility of all studies. Eight observational studies that included more than 500 000 patient-years of data fulfilled our eligibility criteria.

Data Extraction  Teams of 2 reviewers independently abstracted data on study characteristics, sampling method, data sources, and factors controlled for in the analyses. Reviewers resolved disagreements by consensus.

Data Synthesis  The studies reported data from January 1, 1973, through December 31, 1997, and included a median of 1342 facilities per study. Six of the 8 studies showed a statistically significant increase in adjusted mortality in for-profit facilities, 1 showed a nonsignificant trend toward increased mortality in for-profit facilities, and 1 showed a nonsignificant trend toward decreased mortality in for-profit facilities. The pooled estimate, using a random-effects model, demonstrated that private for-profit dialysis centers were associated with an increased risk of death (relative risk, 1.08; 95% confidence interval, 1.04-1.13; P<.001). This relative risk suggests that there are annually 2500 (with a plausible range of 1200-4000) excessive premature deaths in US for-profit dialysis centers.

Conclusions  Hemodialysis care in private not-for-profit centers is associated with a lower risk of mortality compared with care in private for-profit centers.


Author Affiliations: Departments of Medicine (Drs Devereaux, Cook, and Guyatt), Surgery (Dr Bhandari), Anesthesia (Dr Choi), Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics (Drs Choi, Haines, Lavis, Cook, and Guyatt, Ms Lacchetti, and Mr Weaver), and Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences (Dr Haslam), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario; Departments of Medicine (Drs Schünemann and Grant), Physiology and Biophysics (Dr Grant), and Social and Preventive Medicine (Drs Schünemann and Grant), University at Buffalo, and Veterans Affairs Medical Center (Dr Grant), Buffalo, NY; Faculty of Medicine (Ms Ravindran) and Department of Health Policy Management and Evaluation (Dr Sullivan), University of Toronto, and Institute for Work and Health and Population Health Program, Canadian Institute for Advanced Research (Dr Lavis), Toronto, Ontario; and Division of Nephrology, University of Western Ontario, London (Dr Garg).



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

What is "quality of evidence" and why is it important to clinicians?
Guyatt et al.
BMJ 2008;336:995-998.
FULL TEXT  

Competition in a publicly funded healthcare system
Woolhandler and Himmelstein
BMJ 2007;335:1126-1129.
FULL TEXT  

Effect of hospital ownership status and payment structure on the adoption and use of drug-eluting stents for percutaneous coronary interventions
Grilli et al.
CMAJ 2007;176:185-190.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

How Nonprofits Matter In American Medicine, And What To Do About It
Schlesinger and Gray
Health Aff (Millwood) 2006;25:W287-W303.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Evaluation of the quality of prognosis studies in systematic reviews.
Hayden et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2006;144:427-437.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Outcomes of Hemodialysis-Dependent Patients Following Elective Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair
Forbes and Lawlor
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURG 2005;39:425-428.
ABSTRACT  

Care in U.S. Hospitals -- The Hospital Quality Alliance Program
Jha et al.
NEJM 2005;353:265-274.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Kickbacks and self-referral
Dhalla
CMAJ 2004;171:12-13.
FULL TEXT  

The high costs of for-profit care
Woolhandler and Himmelstein
CMAJ 2004;170:1814-1815.
FULL TEXT  

Payments for care at private for-profit and private not-for-profit hospitals: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Devereaux et al.
CMAJ 2004;170:1817-1824.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Canadians Confront Health Care Reform
Abelson et al.
Health Aff (Millwood) 2004;23:186-193.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Use of High-Cost Operative Procedures by Medicare Beneficiaries Enrolled in For-Profit and Not-for-Profit Health Plans
Schneider et al.
NEJM 2004;350:143-150.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Proposals for US National Health Insurance--Reply
Woolhandler et al.
JAMA 2003;290:2799-2800.
FULL TEXT  

The Corporate Transformation of Medicine and Its Impact on Costs and Access to Care
Geyman
J Am Board Fam Med 2003;16:443-454.
FULL TEXT  

Canada's Health Care System -- Reform Delayed
Detsky and Naylor
NEJM 2003;349:804-810.
FULL TEXT  

Quality of Care in Profit vs Not-For-Profit Dialysis Centers
Bosch et al.
JAMA 2003;289:3087-3088.
FULL TEXT  

Quality of Care in Profit vs Not-For-Profit Dialysis Centers
Lyons
JAMA 2003;289:3088-3088.
FULL TEXT  

Quality of Care in Profit vs Not-For-Profit Dialysis Centers
Kalantar-Zadeh et al.
JAMA 2003;289:3089-3089.
FULL TEXT  

Quality of Care in Profit vs Not-For-Profit Dialysis Centers
Blake and Mendelssohn
JAMA 2003;289:3088-3089.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2002 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.