You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 288 No. 2, July 10, 2002 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Toward Optimal Laboratory Use
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (46)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •HIV/AIDS
 •Genetics
 •Genetic Counseling/ Testing/ Therapy
 •Infectious Diseases
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati
What's this?

Real-time, Universal Screening for Acute HIV Infection in a Routine HIV Counseling and Testing Population

Christopher D. Pilcher, MD; J. Todd McPherson, MS; Peter A. Leone, MD; Marlene Smurzynski, MSPH; Judy Owen-O'Dowd, BS; Amy L. Peace-Brewer, PhD; Juanita Harris, BS; Charles B. Hicks, MD; Joseph J. Eron, Jr, MD; Susan A. Fiscus, PhD

JAMA. 2002;288:216-221.

Context  Acute human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection cannot be diagnosed by routine antibody tests and is rarely diagnosed in clinical practice. However, HIV nucleic acid–based testing is widely used to screen for antibody-negative acute infection among low-risk blood donors.

Objective  To assess the feasibility of screening in high-volume laboratories for acute and long-term HIV infection in a routine HIV testing population, in which HIV infection prevalence is low, using specimen pooling and HIV RNA reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) tests.

Design and Setting  Clinical diagnostic performance evaluation at a state-funded public health virology and serology laboratory.

Participants  A total of 8505 consecutive individuals presenting for routine HIV counseling and testing during a total of 20 business days to simulate a month of testing in August and December 2001 at 110 publicly funded testing sites in North Carolina.

Main Outcome Measures  Prevalence of acute and long-term HIV infection. Serum specimens negative by HIV enzyme immunoassay (EIA) were screened in pools by an ultrasensitive HIV RNA RT-PCR test. Results for individual HIV RNA–positive specimens were reclassified as true or false according to results of confirmatory testing.

Results  Of the 8505 individuals screened, 8194 had not previously tested HIV positive and had sufficient serum to complete the testing protocol. Of those, 39 had long-term HIV infection (prevalence, 47.6 per 10 000 at-risk persons [95% confidence interval, 33.8-65.0 per 10 000]). Of the 8155 at-risk individuals whose antibody tests were negative, 5 were HIV RNA positive. Four of those had true-positive acute infection (prevalence, 4.9 per 10 000 [95% confidence interval, 1.3-12.5 per 10 000]). All 4 were women; 2 developed symptoms consistent with an acute retroviral syndrome in the week after testing. Screening all specimens required 147 HIV RNA tests. Overall specificity of the strategy was 0.9999.

Conclusions  These findings suggest the widespread diagnosis of acute HIV infections in a routine testing population is not only possible but feasible using specimen pooling and nucleic acid testing. These additional procedures may increase diagnostic yield by approximately 10% compared with conventional HIV antibody testing.


Author Affiliations: Departments of Medicine (Drs Pilcher, Leone, and Eron), Epidemiology (Ms Smurzynski), and Microbiology and Immunology (Drs Peace-Brewer and Fiscus), University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; North Carolina State Laboratory of Public Health, Serology/Virology Laboratory, Raleigh (Mr McPherson and Ms Harris); HIV/STD Prevention and Care Branch, North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services, Raleigh (Dr Leone and Ms Owen-O'Dowd); and Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC (Dr Hicks).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Detection of acute HIV infections among sexually transmitted disease clinic patients: a practice in Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China
Yin et al.
Sex. Transm. Infect. 2008;84:350-351.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Alternative Algorithms for Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection Diagnosis Using Tests That Are Licensed in the United States
Owen et al.
J. Clin. Microbiol. 2008;46:1588-1595.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Optimizing Screening for Acute Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection with Pooled Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests
Westreich et al.
J. Clin. Microbiol. 2008;46:1785-1792.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A Flu-Like Illness
Cantey et al.
CLIN PEDIATR 2007;46:560-562.
 

Molecular Biology Techniques for Identifying Dermatophytes and Their Possible Use in Diagnosing Onychomycosis in Human Toenail: A Review
Binstock
J. Am. Podiatr. Med. Assoc. 2007;97:134-144.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Detection of Acute Infections during HIV Testing in North Carolina
Pilcher et al.
NEJM 2005;352:1873-1883.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

HIV Infection: Point-of-Care Testing
Donovan et al.
The Annals of Pharmacotherapy 2004;38:670-676.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Routine Screening for Acute HIV
AIDS Clin Care 2002;2002:4-4.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2002 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.