You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 288 No. 21, December 4, 2002 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Perspectives on Care at the Close of Life
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (37)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related letter
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Critical Care/ Intensive Care Medicine
 •Adult Critical Care
 •Patient-Physician Relationship/ Care
 •Patient-Physician Communication
 •End-of-life Care/ Palliative Medicine
 •Perspectives on Care at the Close of Life
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

CLINICIAN'S CORNER
Withdrawal of Life Support

Intensive Caring at the End of Life

Thomas J. Prendergast, MD; Kathleen A. Puntillo, RN, DNSc

JAMA. 2002;288:2732-2740.

The technology and expertise of critical care practice support patients through life-threatening illnesses. Most recover; some die quickly; others, however, linger—neither improving nor acutely dying, alive but with a dwindling capacity to recover from their injury or illness. Management of these patients is often dominated by the question: Is it appropriate to continue life-sustaining therapy? Patients rarely participate in these pivotal discussions because they are either too sick or too heavily sedated. As a result, the decision often falls to the family or the surrogate decision maker, in consultation with the medical team. Decisions of such import are emotionally stressful and are often a source of disagreement. Failure to resolve such disagreements may create conflict that compromises patient care, engenders guilt among family members, and creates dissatisfaction for health care professionals. However, the potential for strained communications is mitigated if clinicians provide timely clinical and prognostic information and support the patient and family with aggressive symptom control, a comfortable setting, and continuous psychosocial support. Effective communication includes sharing the burden of decision making with family members. This shift from individual responsibility to patient-focused consensus often permits the family to understand, perhaps reluctantly and with great sadness, that intensive caring may involve letting go of life-sustaining interventions.


Author Affiliations: Departments of Medicine and Anesthesiology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH (Dr Prendergast); Department of Physiological Nursing, School of Nursing, University of California, San Francisco (Dr Puntillo).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED LETTER

Shared Decision Making About Withdrawing Treatment
Stephen Workman
JAMA. 2003;289(8):981.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Prevalence and Factors of Intensive Care Unit Conflicts: The Conflicus Study
Azoulay et al.
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2009;180:853-860.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The principle of justice in patient priorities in the intensive care unit: the role of significant others
Halvorsen et al.
J. Med. Ethics 2009;35:483-487.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Nursing Roles in End-of-Life Decision Making in Critical Care Settings
Bach et al.
West J Nurs Res 2009;31:496-512.
ABSTRACT  

An Official American Thoracic Society Clinical Policy Statement: Palliative Care for Patients with Respiratory Diseases and Critical Illnesses
Lanken et al.
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2008;177:912-927.
FULL TEXT  

Physicians' confidence in discussing do not resuscitate orders with patients and surrogates
Sulmasy et al.
J. Med. Ethics 2008;34:96-101.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Palliative Care and Psychosocial Contributions in the ICU
Loscalzo
ASH Education Book 2008;2008:481-490.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A communication model for encouraging optimal care at the end of life for hospitalized patients
Workman
QJM 2007;100:791-797.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Burnout Syndrome in Critical Care Nursing Staff
Poncet et al.
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2007;175:698-704.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

On the difficulty of neurosurgical end of life decisions
Schaller and Kessler
J. Med. Ethics 2006;32:65-69.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Prognosis and Decision Making in Severe Stroke
G. Holloway et al.
JAMA 2005;294:725-733.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Quality of Dying and Death in Two Medical ICUs: Perceptions of Family and Clinicians
Levy et al.
Chest 2005;127:1775-1783.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Missed Opportunities during Family Conferences about End-of-Life Care in the Intensive Care Unit
Curtis et al.
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2005;171:844-849.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Supporting Family Caregivers at the End of Life: "They Don't Know What They Don't Know"
Rabow et al.
JAMA 2004;291:483-491.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Shared Decision Making About Withdrawing Treatment
Workman
JAMA 2003;289:981-981.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2002 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.