You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 288 No. 22, December 11, 2002 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Original Contribution
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (49)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Bacterial Infections
 •Sexually Transmitted Diseases
 •Pediatrics
 •Adolescent Medicine
 •Quality of Care
 •Quality of Care, Other
 •Women's Health
 •Women's Health, Other
 •Infectious Diseases
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati
What's this?

Effect of a Clinical Practice Improvement Intervention on Chlamydial Screening Among Adolescent Girls

Mary-Ann B. Shafer, MD; Kathleen P. Tebb, PhD; Robert H. Pantell, MD; Charles J. Wibbelsman, MD; John M. Neuhaus, PhD; Ann C. Tipton, MD; Sharon Brown Kunin, MS; Timothy H. Ko, DrPH, MPH; David M. Schweppe, MPH; David A. Bergman, MD

JAMA. 2002;288:2846-2852.

Context  Chlamydia trachomatis infection is a serious public health concern that disproportionately affects adolescent girls. Although annual C trachomatis screening of sexually active adolescent girls is recommended by health professional organizations and is a Health Employer Data and Information Set (HEDIS) performance measure, this goal is not being met.

Objective  To test the effectiveness of a system-level, clinical practice improvement intervention designed to increase C trachomatis screening by using urine-based tests for sexually active adolescent girls identified during their routine checkups at a pediatric clinic.

Design, Setting, and Participants  A randomized cluster of 10 pediatric clinics in the Kaiser Permanente of Northern California health maintenance organization, where adolescent girls aged 14 to 18 years had a total of 7920 routine checkup visits from April 2000 through March 2002.

Intervention  Five clinics were randomly assigned to provide usual care and 5 to provide the intervention, which required that leadership be engaged by showing the gap between best practice and current practice; a team be assembled to champion the project; barriers be identified and solutions developed through monthly meetings; and progress be monitored with site-specific screening proportions.

Main Outcome Measure  Chlamydia trachomatis screening rate for sexually active 14- to 18-year-old girls during routine checkups at each participating clinic.

Results  The population of adolescents was ethnically diverse with an average age of 15.4 years. Twenty-four percent of girls in the experimental clinics and 23% in the control clinics were sexually active. Of the 1017 patients eligible for screening in the intervention clinic, 478 (47%) were screened; of 1194 eligible for screening in the control clinic, 203 (17%) were screened. At baseline, the proportion screened was 0.05 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.00-0.17) in the intervention and 0.14 (95% CI, 0.01-0.26) in the control clinics. By months 16 to 18, screening rates were 0.65 (95% CI, 0.53-0.77) in the intervention and 0.21 (95% CI, 0.09-0.33) in the control clinics (time period by study group interaction, F6,60 = 5.33; P<.001). The average infection rate for the experimental clinics was 5.8% (23 positive test results out of 393 total urine tests and a total of 3986 clinic visits) vs 7.6% in controls (12 positive test results out of 157 tests and 3934 clinic visits).

Conclusions  Implementation of this clinical practice intervention in a large health maintenance organization system is feasible, and it significantly increased the C trachomatis screening rates for sexually active adolescent girls during routine checkups.


Author Affiliations: Divisions of Adolescent Medicine and General Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics (Drs Shafer, Tebb, and Pantell and Ms Brown Kunin) and Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (Dr Neuhaus), School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco; Kaiser Permanente, San Francisco (Dr Wibbelsman) and Oakland, Calif (Drs Tipton and Ko and Mr Schweppe); and Department of Pediatrics, Lucile Salter Packard Children's Hospital at Stanford Medical Center, Stanford, Calif (Dr Bergman).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Screening for Asymptomatic Chlamydia Infections Among Sexually Active Adolescent Girls During Pediatric Urgent Care
Tebb et al.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2009;163:559-564.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Approaches to Chlamydia Screening: One Size Does Not Fit All
Blake
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2009;163:585-586.
FULL TEXT  

Finding order in heterogeneity: types of quality-improvement intervention publications
Rubenstein et al.
Qual Saf Health Care 2008;17:403-408.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Quality of Ambulatory Care Delivered to Children in the United States
Mangione-Smith et al.
NEJM 2007;357:1515-1523.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Chlamydial Screening in Urgent Care Visits: Adolescent-Reported Acceptability Associated With Adolescent Perception of Clinician Communication
Miller et al.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2007;161:777-782.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Examination of the Treatment and Follow-up Care for Adolescents Who Test Positive for Chlamydia trachomatis Infection
Hwang et al.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2005;159:1162-1166.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Screening Sexually Active Adolescents for Chlamydia trachomatis : What About the Boys?
Tebb et al.
Am. J. Public Health 2005;95:1806-1810.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Systematic Review: Noninvasive Testing for Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae
Cook et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2005;142:914-925.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Chlamydia Screening Among Sexually Active Young Female Enrollees of Health Plans--United States, 1999-2001
JAMA 2004;292:2569-2570.
FULL TEXT  

Projected Economic Costs Due to Health Consequences of Teenagers' Loss of Confidentiality in Obtaining Reproductive Health Care Services in Texas
Franzini et al.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2004;158:1140-1146.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Closing the Gap Between Guidelines and Practice: Ensuring Safe and Healthy Beginnings
Lannon and Stark
Pediatrics 2004;114:494-496.
FULL TEXT  

Sexually Transmitted Diseases and Managed Care: An Inquiry and Review of Issues Affecting Service Delivery
Chorba et al.
American Journal of Medical Quality 2004;19:145-156.
ABSTRACT  

Exploring The Business Case For Improving The Quality Of Health Care For Children
The Child Health Business Case Working Group
Health Aff (Millwood) 2004;23:159-166.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Effects of a Quality Improvement Collaborative on the Outcome of Care of Patients with HIV Infection: The EQHIV Study
Landon et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2004;140:887-896.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Measuring the Quality of Children's Health Care: A Prerequisite to Action
Dougherty and Simpson
Pediatrics 2004;113:185-198.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

OTHER ARTICLES NOTED (24 Jan 03 to 18 Apr 03)
Evid. Based Nurs. 2003;6:e1-12.
FULL TEXT  

INSURANCE AND NONINVASIVE SCREENING FOR STDS
Adam
Am. J. Public Health 2003;93:1033-1034.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2002 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.