You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 288 No. 4, July 24, 2002 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Brief Report
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (20)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Travel Medicine
 •Occupational and Environmental Medicine
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Aircraft Cabin Air Recirculation and Symptoms of the Common Cold

Jessica Nutik Zitter, MD,MPH; Peter D. Mazonson, MD,MBA; Dave P. Miller, MS; Stephen B. Hulley, MD,MPH; John R. Balmes, MD

JAMA. 2002;288:483-486.

Context  In recent years, new commercial aircraft have been designed to recirculate approximately 50% of the cabin air to increase fuel efficiency. Some older aircraft use only fresh air. Whether air recirculation increases the transmission of infectious disease is unknown; some studies have demonstrated higher rates of the common cold among persons working in buildings that recirculate air.

Objective  To evaluate the role of air recirculation as a predictor of postflight upper respiratory tract infections (URIs).

Design, Setting, and Participants  A natural experiment conducted among 1100 passengers departing the San Francisco Bay area in California and traveling to Denver, Colo, during January through early April 1999, and who completed a questionnaire in the boarding area and a follow-up telephone interview 5 to 7 days later. Forty-seven percent traveled aboard airplanes using 100% fresh air for ventilation, and 53% traveled aboard aircraft that recirculated cabin air.

Main Outcome Measure  Incidence of reporting new URI symptoms within 1 week of the flight.

Results  Passengers on airplanes that did and did not recirculate air had similar rates of postflight respiratory symptoms. The rates of reporting a cold were 19% vs 21% (P = .34); a runny nose and a cold, 10% vs 11%, (P = .70); and an aggregation of 8 URI symptoms, 3% in both groups (P>.99). Results were similar after statistical adjustment for potential confounders.

Conclusion  We found no evidence that aircraft cabin air recirculation increases the risk for URI symptoms in passengers traveling aboard commercial jets.


Author Affiliations: Departments of Medicine (Drs Zitter and Balmes) and Epidemiology and Biostatistics (Dr Hulley), University of California, San Francisco; and The Lewin Group, San Francisco, Calif (Dr Mazonson and Mr Miller).



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Acute Respiratory Infections in a Recently Arrived Traveler to Your Part of the World
Gluckman
Chest 2008;134:163-171.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Detection of Airborne Rhinovirus and Its Relation to Outdoor Air Supply in Office Environments
Myatt et al.
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2004;169:1187-1190.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Upper Respiratory Tract Infections Among Airline Passengers
Hocking et al.
JAMA 2002;288:2972-2973.
FULL TEXT  

Recirculated Airplane Air Is Not a Factor in URIs
JWatch Emergency Med. 2002;2002:11-11.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2002 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.