This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on Web of Science (8)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Related letter  • Similar articles in JAMA  Topic Collections  • Law and Medicine  • Alert me on articles by topic  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

A Population-Based Study

Marcia E. Herman-Giddens, PA, DrPH; Jamie B. Smith, MA; Manjoo Mittal, PhD; Mandie Carlson, RN, MPH; John D. Butts, MD

JAMA. 2003;289:1425-1429.

Context  Interest in the discarding or killing of newborns by parents has increased due to wide news coverage and efforts by states to provide Safe Haven legislation to combat the problem.

Objective  To describe the characteristics of these cases in North Carolina.

Design, Setting, and Population  Case series derived from data on all deaths among liveborn infants 0 to 4 days of age reported to the North Carolina medical examiner from 1985 through 2000.

Main Outcome Measures  Incidence of newborns known to have been killed or discarded by a parent; epidemiological characteristics of newborns and parents.

Results  There were 34 newborns known to have been killed or discarded by a parent, comprising 0.002% of all liveborn infants during the 16-year study period, giving a rate of 2.1 per 100 000 per year. A total of 58.8% were male, 41.1% were white, and 52.9% were black. For 29 cases, the perpetrator was determined to be the mother. Among mothers, 50% were single and 20.6% were married (marital status of the remainder was unknown). Thirty-five percent had had other children. Eight mothers (23.5%) were known to have received some prenatal care. The mean age of the mothers was 19.1 years (range, 14-35 years) and more than half were aged 18 years or older. The most common causes of death were asphyxiation/strangulation (41.1%) and drowning (26.5%).

Conclusions  In North Carolina, at least 2.1 per 100 000 newborns are known to be killed or left to die per year, usually by their mothers. It is unknown how many of these deaths might be prevented by Safe Haven laws. Efforts to educate the public about these laws need to target the general public. Where resources are limited, the focus should be on on adolescent pregnancy prevention programs, young adults, prenatal care clinics, and married women.

Author Affiliations: North Carolina Child Advocacy Institute, Raleigh, and Department of Maternal and Child Health, University of North Carolina School of Public Health, Chapel Hill (Dr Herman-Giddens); Injury Prevention Research Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill (Mr Smith); State Center for Health Statistics, Raleigh, NC (Dr Mittal); and Office of the Chief Medical Examiner, Chapel Hill, NC (Ms Carlson and Dr Butts).

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

RELATED LETTER

Motives for Neonaticide
Mauro V. Mendlowicz, Leonardo F. Fontenelle, and Talvane Marins de Moraes
JAMA. 2003;290(4):462-463.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Characteristics of Infant Homicides: Findings From a U.S. Multisite Reporting System
Fujiwara et al.
Pediatrics 2009;124:e210-e217.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The relation between child death and child maltreatment.
Jenny and Isaac
Arch. Dis. Child. 2006;91:265-269.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Child Deaths Resulting From Inflicted Injuries: Household Risk Factors and Perpetrator Characteristics
Schnitzer and Ewigman
Pediatrics 2005;116:e687-e693.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Motives for Neonaticide
Mendlowicz et al.
JAMA 2003;290:462-463.
FULL TEXT  

"Safe havens" for unwanted babies could reduce infanticide
Hopkins Tanne
BMJ 2003;326:678-678.
FULL TEXT