 |
|
Weight Loss With Self-help Compared With a Structured Commercial Program
A Randomized Trial
Stanley Heshka, PhD;
James W. Anderson, MD;
Richard L. Atkinson, MD;
Frank L. Greenway, MD;
James O. Hill, PhD;
Stephen D. Phinney, MD, PhD;
Ronette L. Kolotkin, PhD;
Karen Miller-Kovach, MS, RD;
F. Xavier Pi-Sunyer, MD
JAMA. 2003;289:1792-1798.
Context Although commercial weight loss programs provide treatment to millions of clients, their efficacy has not been evaluated in rigorous long-term trials.
Objective To compare weight loss and health benefits achieved and maintained through self-help weight loss vs with a structured commercial program.
Design and Setting A 2-year, multicenter randomized clinical trial with clinic visits at 12, 26, 52, 78, and 104 weeks conducted at 6 academic research centers in the United States between January 1998 and January 2001.
Participants Overweight and obese men (n = 65) and women (n = 358) (body mass index, 27-40) aged 18 to 65 years.
Intervention Random assignment to either a self-help program (n = 212) consisting of two 20-minute counseling sessions with a nutritionist and provision of self-help resources or to a commercial weight loss program (n = 211) consisting of a food plan, an activity plan, and a cognitive restructuring behavior modification plan, delivered at weekly meetings.
Main Outcome Measures Weight change was the primary outcome measure. Secondary outcomes included waist circumference, body mass index, blood pressure, serum lipids, glucose, and insulin levels.
Results At 2 years, 150 participants (71%) in the commercial group and 159 (75%) in the self-help group completed the study. In the intent-to-treat analysis, mean (SD) weight loss of participants in the commercial group was greater than in the self-help group at 1 year (-4.3 [6.1] kg vs -1.3 [6.1] kg, respectively; P<.001) and at 2 years (-2.9 [6.5] kg vs -0.2 [6.5] kg, respectively; P<.001). Waist circumference (P = .003) and body mass index (P<.001) decreased more in the commercial group. Changes in blood pressure, lipids, glucose, and insulin levels were related to changes in weight in both groups, but between-group differences in biological parameters were mainly nonsignificant by year 2.
Conclusion The structured commercial weight loss program provided modest weight loss but more than self-help over a 2-year period.
Author Affiliations: New York Obesity Research Center, St Luke's/Roosevelt Hospital and Columbia University, New York, NY (Drs Heshka and Pi-Sunyer); VA Medical Center, Lexington, and University of Kentucky (Dr Anderson); Nutritional Sciences, University of Wisconsin, Madison (Dr Atkinson); Pennington Biomedical Research Center, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge (Dr Greenway); Health Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder (Dr Hill); Department of Medicine, University of California at Davis (Dr Phinney); Obesity and Quality of Life Consulting, Durham, NC (Dr Kolotkin); and Weight Watchers International, Woodbury, NY (Ms Miller-Kovach).
 CiteULike  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati
What's this?
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
|
What Do Physicians Recommend To Their Overweight and Obese Patients?
Phelan et al.
J Am Board Fam Med 2009;22:115-122.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Impact of a Weight Management Program on Health-Related Quality of Life in Overweight Adults With Type 2 Diabetes
Williamson et al.
Arch Intern Med 2009;169:163-171.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Weight Regain Prevention
Garcia Ulen et al.
Clin. Diabetes 2008;26:100-113.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Meta-analysis: The Effect of Dietary Counseling for Weight Loss
Dansinger et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2007;147:41-50.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
How to Maintain Lost Weight
Craig
Diabetes Spectr. 2007;20:186-188.
FULL TEXT
Why do obese patients not lose more weight when treated with low-calorie diets? A mechanistic perspective
Heymsfield et al.
Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2007;85:346-354.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Short-term meal replacements followed by dietary macronutrient restriction enhance weight loss in polycystic ovary syndrome
Moran et al.
Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2006;84:77-87.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Obesity - an epidemic of the twenty-first century: an update for psychiatrists
Holt
J Psychopharmacol 2005;19:6-15.
ABSTRACT
Innovative techniques to address retention in a behavioral weight-loss trial
Goldberg and Kiernan
Health Educ Res 2005;20:439-447.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Behavioral treatment of obesity
Foster et al.
Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2005;82:230S-235S.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Comparison of the Atkins, Ornish, Weight Watchers, and Zone Diets for Weight Loss and Heart Disease Risk Reduction: A Randomized Trial
Dansinger et al.
JAMA 2005;293:43-53.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
The Dietary Approach to Obesity: Is It the Diet or the Disorder?
Eckel
JAMA 2005;293:96-97.
FULL TEXT
Systematic Review: An Evaluation of Major Commercial Weight Loss Programs in the United States
Tsai and Wadden
ANN INTERN MED 2005;142:56-66.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Clinical Implications of Obesity With Specific Focus on Cardiovascular Disease: A Statement for Professionals From the American Heart Association Council on Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism: Endorsed by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
Klein et al.
Circulation 2004;110:2952-2967.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
The Effects of Low-Carbohydrate versus Conventional Weight Loss Diets in Severely Obese Adults: One-Year Follow-up of a Randomized Trial
Stern et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2004;140:778-785.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Principles and Practices in the Management of Obesity
Foster
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2003;168:274-280.
FULL TEXT
Commercial Programs or Self-Help for Weight Loss?
JWatch Women's Health 2003;2003:1-1.
FULL TEXT
Treating Obesity: New Directions
JWatch Psychiatry 2003;2003:2-2.
FULL TEXT
News About Obesity from JAMA
JWatch General 2003;2003:6-6.
FULL TEXT
|
